TACE With Dicycloplatin(TP21) in Unresectable HCC

NCT ID: NCT05472896

Last Updated: 2022-07-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

332 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-09

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TP21 injection for TACE in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma:

1. Primary efficacy endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS), which will be assessed by the Independent Review Committee according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST).
2. Secondary efficacy endpoints: PFS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), 1-year progression-free survival, 1-year survival and 2-year survival assessed by the investigator.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

TP21 injection is a supramolecular compound that has completed early pharmacological and toxicological preclinical studies, as well as phase I and II clinical studies. Data from previous studies showed that TP21 injection has significant advantages over traditional platinum-based drugs in terms of broad spectrum, low toxicity, high efficacy and low drug resistance etc. The results of the Phase II TACE clinical exploratory study in hepatocellular carcinoma showed a trend for TP21 alone to be significantly better than epirubicin alone, and due to the small sample size, the available data were insufficient to demonstrate obvious advantage of this drug. Now, a confirmatory phase III clinical study of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma is needed, which may continue to adopt the main design of the phase II clinical trial, in a single agent comparison form: all the subjects will be randomized 1:1 into TP21+lipiodol group (trial group), and epirubicin hydrochloride+lipiodol group (control group) to receive TACE treatment of either "TP21+lipiodol" or "epirubicin hydrochloride+lipiodol". TACE treatment should be carried out for no more than 3 times in half a year to no more than 5 times within 1 year, and about 332 subjects will be enrolled, 166 for the trial group and the control group each.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

an open, parallel-controlled, multicenter randomized trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
the independent review committee (IRC) was used to evaluate the efficacy, and the readers reviewed the imaging data in a blinded state to make efficacy judgments. The following information was blinded to independent readers: subject's name, date of birth, personal information such as subject's initials, date of examination, statistical grouping, name of study unit, lesion selected by study unit for tumor evaluation, study Unit-determined tumor response and imaging reasons.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cTACE with TP21

In experimental groups, the dosage of dicycloplatin (TP21) was based on the body surface area (550 mg/m2) according to previous research. If grade III or above myelosuppression was observed, an adjusted dose of 450 mg/m2 was then considered, or the patient was removed from the group at the investigator's discretion.The volume ratio of lipiodol to dicycloplatin aqueous solution was 1:1.The volume of lipiodol used was calculated by the size and vascularity of the tumor, within 20 mL. Standardized gelatin sponge particles of 150-350 μm or 350-560 μm in diameter were injected following embolization with ethiodized oil-chemoembolic emulsion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cTACE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with

Dicycloplatin (TP21)

Intervention Type DRUG

the dosage of dicycloplatin was based on the body surface area (550 mg/m2) according to previous research. The volume ratio of lipiodol to dicycloplatin aqueous solution was 1:1. The volume of lipiodol used was calculated by the size and vascularity of the tumor, within 20 mL.

cTACE with epirubicin

the dosage of epirubicin was determined according to the tumor size, and the maximum dose was limited to 40 mg. The volume ratio of lipiodol to epirubicin aqueous solution was 2:1. The volume of lipiodol used was calculated by the size and vascularity of the tumor, within 20 mL. Standardized gelatin sponge particles of 150-350 μm or 350-560 μm in diameter were injected following embolization with ethiodized oil-chemoembolic emulsion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cTACE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with

Epirubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

the dosage of epirubicin was determined according to the tumor size, and the maximum dose was limited to 40 mg. The volume ratio of lipiodol to epirubicin aqueous solution was 2:1. The volume of lipiodol used was calculated by the size and vascularity of the tumor, within 20 mL.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cTACE

transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dicycloplatin (TP21)

the dosage of dicycloplatin was based on the body surface area (550 mg/m2) according to previous research. The volume ratio of lipiodol to dicycloplatin aqueous solution was 1:1. The volume of lipiodol used was calculated by the size and vascularity of the tumor, within 20 mL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Epirubicin

the dosage of epirubicin was determined according to the tumor size, and the maximum dose was limited to 40 mg. The volume ratio of lipiodol to epirubicin aqueous solution was 2:1. The volume of lipiodol used was calculated by the size and vascularity of the tumor, within 20 mL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. age 18 years or older, and life expectancy ≥ 3 months;
2. histopathologically or clinically confirmed HCC;
3. Child-Pugh class A or B liver function (≤7 level), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) score of 0, 1 or 2;
4. China Liver Cancer stage IIb, IIIa (only Cheng's classification type I:portal vein tumor thrombus invading the portal vein branches of the liver lobe or liver segment) , and Ib, 2a patients who can be surgically removed, but are unable or unwilling to undergo surgery due to other reasons (such as advanced age, severe liver cirrhosis, etc.);
5. at least one lesion measurable by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors for HCC (mRECIST);
6. no history of TACE or tumor recurrence after curative-intent therapy (i.e., surgical resection or ablation);
7. No blood transfusion and blood products, no use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) and other hematopoietic stimulating factors within 2 weeks before screening; Hemoglobin ≥ 80g/L;Platelet count ≥ 60×10\^9 /L; White blood cell count ≥ 3×10\^9/L; Alanine aminotransferase ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal; Aspartate aminotransferase ≤ 3×times the upper limit of normal; Serum creatinine Cr ≤ 1.5×times the upper limit of normal;

Exclusion Criteria

1. allergic to platinum or iodine products or epirubicin and related excipients;
2. diffuse HCC (whole liver tumor burden ≥ 70%),and the hepatocellular carcinoma is hypovascular;
3. first-order branches and distant of the portal vein tumor thrombus;
4. Liver function classification is Child Pugh C;
5. Invasion of left and right hepatic duct, common hepatic duct, cystic duct and common bile duct;
6. The tumor has severe arteriovenous shunt, which the investigator judges may affect the efficacy of TACE; or there is extrahepatic metastasis;
7. Patients with other tumors, except for thyroid tumors and skin carcinoma in situ that have been cured, early cervical cancer;
8. Have a history of gastrointestinal bleeding or a marked tendency to gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months before randomization;
9. Uncorrectable abnormal coagulation function or bleeding tendency;
10. received other antitumor therapies within the past 4 weeks (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy,Chinese medicine with antitumor effect), or received the above anti-tumor drugs within 5 half-lives;
11. received immunotherapy, targeted therapy or radiotherapy for intrahepatic tumors
12. have received an organ transplant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gao-jun Teng

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gao-jun Teng

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gao-Jun Teng, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zhongda Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hai-Dong Zhu Doctor, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

13851420979

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hai-Dong Zhu

Role: primary

86-25-83262224

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TP21-TACE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TATE Versus TACE in Intermediate Stage HCC
NCT03145558 TERMINATED PHASE2