Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Determination Evaluating Real Differences After TimE
NCT ID: NCT05446285
Last Updated: 2022-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
245 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-07
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Participants Preferences to Disease Modifying Agents in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Condition
NCT02598167
Traditional Versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis Trial
NCT03500328
Study Assessing Cognition in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Patients Treated With BG00012
NCT02579681
Impact of Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs) and Associated Support Services in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Patients
NCT01601119
Risk Perception in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT05528666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To capture and analyse both prospective and retrospective data we will use the OPTIMISE portal. This is a database tool under development in Imperial College London which aims to provide a secure IT framework to capture patient-centred data in MS research. Its aim is to facilitate the capture of prospective longitudinal, standardised clinical and patient-centred data, ideally with an ease that would allow it to be used as an adjunct to routine clinical practice. It will ultimately provide open-source software for management of MS data, integrating anonymised information from multiple centres. Our proposed registry study will utilise the OPTIMISE portal and platform for data capture and analysis - this will serve to pilot the platform before its implementation on a wider scale in a variety of different projects, including the nationwide Scottish DMT database currently under development.
In order to compare these non-randomised patient groups we will use propensity score matching (PSM). This statistical method can account for all the known variables that inform the decision-making process of DMT initiation and escalation, and is used in observational studies to mimic the process of randomisation. The decision to initiate or escalate DMTs in RRMS in clinical practice is based on both patient and disease related factors. Patients with more clinically severe disease are more likely to have DMTs initiated or escalated. For DMT initiation, we will calculate the propensity score based on known prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis that predict a more severe disease course, which would suggest the need for DMT initiation. For DMT escalation, we will evaluate the disease course of each patient over the first 3 years of follow up, using recent guidance on clinical and radiological features that suggest escalation to treatment or more effective treatment is required. These factors will be included as weighted variables to generate a summary number (0-1), the Propensity Score (PS): a higher propensity score would suggest a higher likelihood of being in the treated or escalated group.
Once each patient has been assigned a propensity score, we will assess the actual use of DMTs, matching treated and non-treated, and escalated and non-escalated patients into pairs for comparison of outcome. We anticipate that more patients with a high propensity score (and therefore a higher propensity to treatment) will have been initiated or escalated onto DMTs in Greater Glasgow in comparison to Grampian. Prognostically similar patients managed differently within a centre will also be matched, since the purpose is to compare patients and not centres. If data from the Glasgow and Grampian Centres do not provide enough propensity-matched pairs, data from the Edinburgh and Dundee centres can also be extracted.
Phase 1 - completed This retrospective phase has been completed and examined whether patients with RRMS are treated differently within Scotland despite similar disease severity. We established the proportion of patients from each centre with a high propensity score for DMT initiation or escalation who were 'treated' and 'escalated', or not, respectively. This allowed us to identify pairs for comparison of outcomes in the prospective phase of the study (Phases 2).
Phase 2 - proposed Propensity score-matched patients who were managed differently during phase 1 will be invited for a clinical assessment and MRI in the prospective phase of the study. This will be 10 years on from date of diagnosis. Contemporary clinical assessment will include physical and cognitive evaluations as detailed below. Updated radiological assessment with MRI will assess T2 and T1 lesions and total brain volume. Patients will also be asked to provide a variety of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) by completing validated questionnaires to describe their perceived disease status. After assessments are complete, a clinical history via a structured questionnaire will be performed to capture disease activity and changing/escalation of treatment from diagnosis to point of assessment 10 years later.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treated
Patients initiating disease modifying treatment within the first year of diagnosis
Clinical assessment
All participants will be invited to attend their local research facility to undergo a physical and questionnaire assessment as well as an MRI. Assessments include: Expanded Disability Status Scale, 9-Hole Peg Test, MRI scan, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (MSIS-29, neuroQOL and PROMIS), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS)
Untreated
Patients who do not initiate disease modifying treatment within the first year of diagnosis
Clinical assessment
All participants will be invited to attend their local research facility to undergo a physical and questionnaire assessment as well as an MRI. Assessments include: Expanded Disability Status Scale, 9-Hole Peg Test, MRI scan, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (MSIS-29, neuroQOL and PROMIS), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical assessment
All participants will be invited to attend their local research facility to undergo a physical and questionnaire assessment as well as an MRI. Assessments include: Expanded Disability Status Scale, 9-Hole Peg Test, MRI scan, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (MSIS-29, neuroQOL and PROMIS), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biogen
INDUSTRY
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Research Facility
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16/WS/0017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.