Added Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT ID: NCT05445973
Last Updated: 2022-07-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
248 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2022-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre-procedure Planning for Radiofrequency Ablation Using CT or MR/US Fusion
NCT02687113
Pre-procedure Planning for Liver Biopsy or Radiofrequency Ablation Using CT or MR/US Fusing Imaging
NCT02967198
Effectivity and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Percutaneously Radiofrequency Ablation for Liver Cancer
NCT03026452
No-touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Triple Cooled-Wet Electrodes
NCT05449873
Evaluation of Performance of Automatic Fusion for Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02705118
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent studies reported that after adding CEUS using Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) or SonoVue to FI, 83.3% to 90% of target liver cancers that were initially difficult to visualize on FI became conspicuous, allowing them to be directly targeted for RFA. However, these studies had limitations, including a retrospective study design, a small sample size (\< 30 inconspicuous tumors), or a short-term follow-up (\< 1 year). Furthermore, no prospective study has explored the value of CEUS-CT/MRI FI, using both SonoVue and Sonazoid as contrast agents, for localizing index tumors and guiding RFA procedures in patients with inconspicuous tumors on B-mode US and reported its therapeutic impact on local tumor control.
Therefore, the present study investigated whether CEUS-CT/MRI FI improved the visibility of small (≤ 3 cm) primary and secondary liver tumors that were invisible or difficult to visualize on B-mode US for percutaneous RFA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography-CT/MRI Fusion Guidance
To investigate whether CEUS-CT/MRI fusion imaging improved the visualization of small (≤ 3 cm) primary and secondary malignant liver tumors that were inconspicuous on B-mode US for percutaneous RFA.
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
In brief, ablation was performed using a 200-W multichannel generator and a switching monopolar technique with separate clustered electrodes. Tumor targeting was done under the guidance of CEUS-CT/MRI FI, and the ablation procedure was monitored with US-FI. The ablation procedure was terminated when the operator expected to complete the ablation of the index tumor with a minimum 5-mm ablative margin on the US-FI images.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
In brief, ablation was performed using a 200-W multichannel generator and a switching monopolar technique with separate clustered electrodes. Tumor targeting was done under the guidance of CEUS-CT/MRI FI, and the ablation procedure was monitored with US-FI. The ablation procedure was terminated when the operator expected to complete the ablation of the index tumor with a minimum 5-mm ablative margin on the US-FI images.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* tumor size ≤ 3 cm
* pathologic diagnosis of primary or secondary liver malignancy or imaging-based diagnosis of HCC according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines or viable HCC according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm
* consideration of curative-intent RFA
Exclusion Criteria
* the absence of available data from multiphase CT or MRI performed in the 3-month pre-procedure period
* poor quality registration of US-CT/MRI fusion imaging and RFA planned with palliative intent
* contraindications for the conventional RFA procedure at the authors' institution, which are uncontrollable coagulopathy (platelet count \< 50,000/μL or international standard ratio ≥ 1.6), a low level of cooperation, impracticality of sedation, portal vein thrombus, the tumor abutting the portal vein, or larger bile ducts than the segmental branches
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeong Min Lee
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeong Min Lee
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seoul National University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Jongno-gu, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee DH, Lee JM. Recent Advances in the Image-Guided Tumor Ablation of Liver Malignancies: Radiofrequency Ablation with Multiple Electrodes, Real-Time Multimodality Fusion Imaging, and New Energy Sources. Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):545-559. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.545. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, Breen DJ, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Chen MH, Choi BI, de Baere T, Dodd GD 3rd, Dupuy DE, Gervais DA, Gianfelice D, Gillams AR, Lee FT Jr, Leen E, Lencioni R, Littrup PJ, Livraghi T, Lu DS, McGahan JP, Meloni MF, Nikolic B, Pereira PL, Liang P, Rhim H, Rose SC, Salem R, Sofocleous CT, Solomon SB, Soulen MC, Tanaka M, Vogl TJ, Wood BJ, Goldberg SN; International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation; Interventional Oncology Sans Frontieres Expert Panel; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology; Standard of Practice Committee of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1691-705.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Feng K, Ma KS. Value of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 28;20(20):5987-98. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.5987.
Gao J, Wang SH, Ding XM, Sun WB, Li XL, Xin ZH, Ning CM, Guo SG. Radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma 3 cm or less as first-line treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5287-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5287.
Lee DH, Kim JW, Lee JM, Kim JM, Lee MW, Rhim H, Hur YH, Suh KS. Laparoscopic Liver Resection versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Single Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes. Liver Cancer. 2021 Feb;10(1):25-37. doi: 10.1159/000510909. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Lee MW, Kang D, Lim HK, Cho J, Sinn DH, Kang TW, Song KD, Rhim H, Cha DI, Lu DSK. Updated 10-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy for single hepatocellular carcinoma < 3 cm: emphasis on association of local tumor progression and overall survival. Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2391-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06575-0. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Dietrich CF, Nolsoe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Clevert DA, Cui X, Dong Y, D'Onofrio M, Fowlkes JB, Gilja OH, Huang P, Ignee A, Jenssen C, Kono Y, Kudo M, Lassau N, Lee WJ, Lee JY, Liang P, Lim A, Lyshchik A, Meloni MF, Correas JM, Minami Y, Moriyasu F, Nicolau C, Piscaglia F, Saftoiu A, Sidhu PS, Sporea I, Torzilli G, Xie X, Zheng R. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2579-2604. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
Mauri G, Cova L, De Beni S, Ierace T, Tondolo T, Cerri A, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L. Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusion for guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US: results in 295 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Feb;38(1):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0897-y. Epub 2014 May 8.
Minami Y, Kudo M. Review of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec 7;17(45):4952-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i45.4952.
Francica G, Meloni MF, Riccardi L, de Sio I, Terracciano F, Caturelli E, Iadevaia MD, Amoruso A, Roselli P, Chiang J, Scaglione M, Pompili M. Ablation treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in field practice of interventional ultrasound centers. A multicenter study. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Aug;105:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 31.
Lee Y, Yoon JH, Han S, Joo I, Lee JM. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography-CT/MRI fusion guidance for percutaneous ablation of inconspicuous, small liver tumors: improving feasibility and therapeutic outcome. Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00650-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUNH 1811-136-989
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.