Stellate Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
NCT ID: NCT05427500
Last Updated: 2025-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE3
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-30
2027-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Augmenting Massed Prolonged Exposure With a Stellate Ganglion Block to Treat PTSD
NCT04302181
Effects of Stellate Ganglion Block in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
NCT05391971
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Stellate Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
NCT01629537
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Stellate Ganglion Block for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms - Effectiveness
NCT03077919
Combining Stellate Ganglion Block With Prolonged Exposure for PTSD
NCT05889741
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is a medical procedure that involves injection of local anesthetic around the stellate ganglion, which is a collection of sympathetic (fight-or-flight) nerves near the base of the neck (C6-7). This procedure causes a short-lived shutdown of sympathetic nerve signals (up to 5-7 hours) and is commonly performed in Canada for certain pain and medical conditions. SGB is an interventional procedure that temporarily blocks sympathetic signaling to the arms, neck and head with long-established therapeutic benefits for sympathetically maintained pain and other medical conditions. In the past decade, SGB was found to provide a rapid and sustained reduction of PTSD symptoms in numerous case reports and series. Further, two randomized controlled trials of SGB in PTSD have been conducted. The first study in active and retired military personnel with combat and non-combat PTSD did not differentiate the effect of SGB from sham control one week or one month post-injection , although these results were inconclusive due to methodological limitations. The second study in active-duty military personnel established substantial efficacy of SGB that was administered twice in a 2-week interval when assessed at eight weeks after the first injection . Notably, most of the studies above were conducted in predominantly male active-duty military samples and none specifically in veterans, law enforcement officers, or first responders. Considering these results and the known safety of this procedure, SGB has been increasingly used to treat PTSD in the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) system, but has not yet been evaluated in Canada.
The mechanism of action of SGB in PTSD is not well understood. Presumably, SGB directly reduces peripheral sympathetic tone but may also project to the central nervous system to activate neuroplasticity processes. The current consensus is that SGB has a unique adjunct potential in PTSD treatment, but the parameters of its use and mechanism of action require further study. In order to enhance care and in response to requests from our patients and their clinicians, we initiated a collaboration between the OSI and TOH Pain clinics to facilitate access to SGB for our patients, particularly those who are not improving with traditional therapies because of intractable hyperarousal and anxiety. To date, 15 patients have undergone off-label SGB procedures at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) Pain Clinic, seven for whom we have clinical data up to eight weeks post-SGB. We are still collecting follow-up data for the other eight patients, who had the procedure done more recently. Of those seven who underwent SGB procedures prior to October 2021, five were responders on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), as evidenced by a 10-point decrease in the total score, between one week pre-SGB and eight weeks post-SGB. Mean Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) scores decreased from the severe to moderate range. Within 2 weeks of the procedure, one patient commented that he had "less anxiety, no panic attacks," and another reported, "It was like the entire planet felt less menacing and I felt calmer than I had in years." There were no serious adverse events related to the SGB procedure. In summary, current treatments for PTSD have shortcomings and less success in military veterans. One of the most significant challenges for recovery from PTSD is an overactive "fight-or-flight" state, fueled by the sympathetic nervous system. Patients struggle with near constant hyperarousal as they are in a state of physical and mental readiness to react to a threat. While this reaction is appropriate in dangerous situations, as a symptom of PTSD, it becomes excessive and uncontrollable, leading to persistent anxiety, irritability, agitation, startle, and sleep problems as well as triggering traumatic memories and standing in the way of regular life activities. Currently, even the best treatments for PTSD do not directly reduce hyperarousal or sympathetic activity, making it more difficult for patients to engage in and benefit from trauma-focused therapy or medications. Sufferers are often prompted to self-medicate with alcohol and other substances, which also negatively impact the patient's family and support network. This significant treatment gap calls for exploring novel ways to lessen the entrenched "fight or flight" state in those with PTSD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single SGB
This arm will receive a single 5 mL dose of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine.
5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine
IV will be inserted. Patient will be connected to cardiorespiratory monitors. The neck will be cleansed twice. A high frequency (15-6 MHz) linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the arteries, jugular vein, and other important vasculature. Once a clear path for the needle is identified, the skin is anesthetized. A cutting tip spinal needle is then inserted at the lateral aspect of the field and advanced in-plane under ultrasound visualization. A test injection is injected to verify placement, then 5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine will be injected. Per standard SGB procedure, vitals will be measured post-SGB and participants will remain in the clinic for approximately 15 minutes to monitor for any serious adverse events.
Repeated SGB
This arm will receive two 5 mL doses of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine.
5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine
IV will be inserted. Patient will be connected to cardiorespiratory monitors. The neck will be cleansed twice. A high frequency (15-6 MHz) linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the arteries, jugular vein, and other important vasculature. Once a clear path for the needle is identified, the skin is anesthetized. A cutting tip spinal needle is then inserted at the lateral aspect of the field and advanced in-plane under ultrasound visualization. A test injection is injected to verify placement, then 5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine will be injected. Per standard SGB procedure, vitals will be measured post-SGB and participants will remain in the clinic for approximately 15 minutes to monitor for any serious adverse events.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine
IV will be inserted. Patient will be connected to cardiorespiratory monitors. The neck will be cleansed twice. A high frequency (15-6 MHz) linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the arteries, jugular vein, and other important vasculature. Once a clear path for the needle is identified, the skin is anesthetized. A cutting tip spinal needle is then inserted at the lateral aspect of the field and advanced in-plane under ultrasound visualization. A test injection is injected to verify placement, then 5 mL of 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine will be injected. Per standard SGB procedure, vitals will be measured post-SGB and participants will remain in the clinic for approximately 15 minutes to monitor for any serious adverse events.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18-69 years
3. Under care of a mental health clinician
4. Not benefited from adequate trials of pharmacological or psychological evidence-based treatment and/or a preference and consent for a trial of SGB
Exclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of bipolar or psychotic disorder
3. Moderate to severe substance use within the last 30 days (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
4. In process of disability assessment or legal action
5. Moderate or severe TBI (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
6. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
7. Current anticoagulant use (eligible if can be held before the procedure)
8. History of bleeding disorder (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
9. Infection, mass or anatomic abnormalities at target injection site
10. Myocardial infarction within 6 months of procedure (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
11. Pathologic bradycardia or irregularities of heart rate or rhythm (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
12. Symptomatic hypotension (BP\<90/60 + clinical symptoms of hypotension)
13. Phrenic or laryngeal nerve palsy (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
14. History of glaucoma (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
15. Uncontrolled seizure disorder (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
16. Known history of allergy to local anesthetics (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
17. Severe COPD (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
18. Pneumothorax (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
19. Contralateral pneumonectomy or non-functional lung (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
20. Active systemic infection (based on chart and verbal report from patient)
21. Patient refusal/inability to tolerate procedure/positioning
22. Contraindication to MR imaging
23. Any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator could create a hazard to the participant's safety, endanger the study procedures, or interfere with the interpretation of study results.
18 Years
69 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rebecca Gomez, MD
Psychiatrist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Gomez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Psychiatrist at the OSI Clinic at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rae Olmsted KL, Bartoszek M, Mulvaney S, McLean B, Turabi A, Young R, Kim E, Vandermaas-Peeler R, Morgan JK, Constantinescu O, Kane S, Nguyen C, Hirsch S, Munoz B, Wallace D, Croxford J, Lynch JH, White R, Walters BB. Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block Treatment on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):130-138. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3474.
Peterson K, Bourne D, Anderson J, Mackey K, Helfand M. Evidence Brief: Effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Block for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2017 Feb. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442253/
American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5™ (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc
Steenkamp MM, Litz BT, Hoge CW, Marmar CR. Psychotherapy for Military-Related PTSD: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):489-500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8370.
Krystal JH, Davis LL, Neylan TC, A Raskind M, Schnurr PP, Stein MB, Vessicchio J, Shiner B, Gleason TC, Huang GD. It Is Time to Address the Crisis in the Pharmacotherapy of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Consensus Statement of the PTSD Psychopharmacology Working Group. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;82(7):e51-e59. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 14. No abstract available.
Hoge CW. Interventions for war-related posttraumatic stress disorder: meeting veterans where they are. JAMA. 2011 Aug 3;306(5):549-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1096. No abstract available.
DePierro J, Lepow L, Feder A, Yehuda R. Translating Molecular and Neuroendocrine Findings in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Resilience to Novel Therapies. Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 15;86(6):454-463. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
Aleanakian R, Chung BY, Feldmann RE Jr, Benrath J. Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictive Potential in Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Blockades for the Treatment of Sympathetically Maintained Pain. Pain Pract. 2020 Jul;20(6):626-638. doi: 10.1111/papr.12892. Epub 2020 May 17.
Lipov EG, Joshi JR, Lipov S, Sanders SE, Siroko MK. Cervical sympathetic blockade in a patient with post-traumatic stress disorder: a case report. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):227-8. doi: 10.1080/10401230802435518. No abstract available.
Mulvaney SW, Lynch JH, Hickey MJ, Rahman-Rawlins T, Schroeder M, Kane S, Lipov E. Stellate ganglion block used to treat symptoms associated with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder: a case series of 166 patients. Mil Med. 2014 Oct;179(10):1133-40. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00151.
Lipov E, Ritchie EC. A review of the use of stellate ganglion block in the treatment of PTSD. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):599. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0599-4.
Hanling SR, Hickey A, Lesnik I, Hackworth RJ, Stedje-Larsen E, Drastal CA, McLay RN. Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):494-500. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000402.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.