Efficacy of Two ONS in Patients at Nutritional Risk With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT05423938

Last Updated: 2022-06-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-04

Study Completion Date

2022-02-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: The aim of the study was to compare the glycemic and insulinemic response of malnourished patients with type 2 diabetes after oral feed between a diabetic oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and a standard one.

Methods: Randomized, double-blind, crossover, multicenter clinical trial, conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes and a diagnosis of malnutrition (SGA). Patients were randomized to receive two ONS: diabetic (Bi1 diacare hp/hc) or control (standard, isocaloric and isoproteic), a week apart. A glycemia and insulinemia curve was made at times: 0', 30', 60', 90', 120', and 180', after drank 200 ml of the ONS. The analyzed variables were the area under the curve (AUC 0-t) of glucosa and insulin, and the maximum concentration of glucose (Cmax).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Malnutrition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Randomized, crossover, double blind, multicenter, clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bi1 diacare hp-hc

During 6 days, patients received 2 ONS of a specific formula for diabetes, high energy (300 kcal/unit) and high protein (20%), with fiber, EPA\&DHA, EVOO and a specific mix of low glycemic index of carbohydrate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Diabetic

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

It is a hypercaloric and hyperproteic dietary supplement formulated to contribute to control the glycemia with: a specific mix of carbohydrate with a low GI, fiber, EVOO and EPA\&DHA

Control

During 6 days, patients received 2 ONS of a standar formula, high energy (300 kcal/unit) and high protein (20%), without fiber, without EPA\&DHA, without EVOO and without a specific mix of low glycemic index of carbohydrate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

It is a hypercaloric and hyperproteic dietary supplement formulated without the ingredients to contribute in the glycemia control

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diabetic

It is a hypercaloric and hyperproteic dietary supplement formulated to contribute to control the glycemia with: a specific mix of carbohydrate with a low GI, fiber, EVOO and EPA\&DHA

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Control

It is a hypercaloric and hyperproteic dietary supplement formulated without the ingredients to contribute in the glycemia control

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bi1 diacare hp-hc

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with DM2 (confirmed by the use of oral hypoglycemic agents for at least two months).
* Patients at nutritional risk diagnosed through the Subjective Global Assessment.
* Adequate cultural level and understanding of the clinical study.
* Agree to voluntarily participate in the study and give their informed consent in writing.
* Non-pregnant and non-lactating women or women who have given birth at least six weeks prior to the screening visit.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Type 1 DM, DM2 with insulin treatment and DM secondary to steroids.
2. Consumption of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors.
3. Current infection (requiring medication or hospitalization), patients undergoing inpatient surgery, or receiving corticosteroids within the past three months or antibiotics within the past three weeks prior to Screening Visit.
4. BMI \> 35 Kg/m2.
5. Active malignant neoplasm (except the following dermal malignancies: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri).
6. End-stage organ failure (such as end-stage renal disease) or organ transplant.
7. Advanced chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min).
8. Severe liver disease.
9. Severe gastroparesis.
10. Chronic infectious disease, such as active tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C, or HIV infection.
11. Consumption of phytotherapy products, dietary supplements or medications except oral hypoglycemic agents, during the four weeks prior to the screening visit, which could profoundly affect (in the opinion of the PI) blood glucose.
12. Allergy or intolerance to any component of the products under study.
13. Participation in a concurrent trial that conflicts with this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Adventia Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

José M. García Almeida

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DIACARE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GALLANT 22 Tesaglitazar vs. Placebo
NCT00252837 TERMINATED PHASE3
GALLANT 4 Tesaglitazar vs. Glibenclamide
NCT00255541 TERMINATED PHASE3