WALANT in Distal Radius Fracture Osteosynthesis

NCT ID: NCT05421000

Last Updated: 2022-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-20

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the applicability and potential benefits of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) or Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet ("LANT) versus locoregional anesthesia (LRA) and tourniquet in osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures (DRF) during the immediate postoperative period. Our hypothesis is that being able to avoid the use of a limb tourniquet in such a procedure may cause less swelling and better surgical wound appearance in the immediate postoperative period, without compromising pain level, patient satisfaction, or improving the number of complications. In this regard, prospective randomized study was designed comparing short term results of patients who were operated using WALANT (A) to locoregional anesthesia (LRA) and tourniquet (B). Main outcomes were pain, swelling and patient satisfaction. Surgical wound bleeding,mobility, surgeon's technical difficulty, insufficient anesthesia and complications were also evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radius Fracture Distal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients who had a surgical distal radius fracture, met all the inclusion criteria and signed the informed consent were randomized either to Group A in which WALANT technique was performed or Group B in which locoregional anesthesia(LRA) and upper limb tourniquet was used. This process was done by the external observer with 10 block randomization. Blinding was not possible as the differences between the anesthetic techniques are evident. However, none of the patients nor the surgeon or the anesthesiologist knew the group of intervention until the patient arrived at the operating anteroom the same day of surgery.

Since the investigators considered this was a complex intervention, all patients were offered to receive sedation from the anesthesiologist if they presented any level of anxiety.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
10 block randomization was done by an external observer. Accordingly, the surgeon, the anesthesic or the patient didn't know about intervention until it was time to be exposed to the treatment

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

WALANT

Wide awake local anesthesia without tourniquet was used for surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

WALANT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Wide awake local anesthesia without tourniquet for distal radius fracture surgery

Locoregional anesthesia and tourniquet

Locoregional anesthesia (normally axillary block) and tourniquet was used for surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Locoregional anesthesia and tourniquet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Locoregional anesthesia and tourniquet for distal radius fracture surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

WALANT

Wide awake local anesthesia without tourniquet for distal radius fracture surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Locoregional anesthesia and tourniquet

Locoregional anesthesia and tourniquet for distal radius fracture surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who attended our hospital from December 2020th to December 2021 with DRF requiring surgical treatment who provided written informed consent and did not have any of the following excluding conditions described below

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unsigned informed consent
2. 17 years old or younger
3. Associated fractures in which additional osteosynthesis was required: scaphoid fracture, ulnar fracture (ulnar styloid osteosynthesis included), bifocal radius fractures, etc
4. Open fractures
5. Polytrauma patients
6. Requiring more than a standard volar DRF approach and/or other than a volar plate.
7. DRF with \>30 days or DRF malunions Contraindications to the use of ischemia

a. Peripheral vascular disease b. Extensive soft tissue injury c. Peripheral neuropathy d. Severe infection e. Thromboembolic disease in the extremity f. Poor skin conditions g. Arteriovenous fistula h. Sickle cell hemoglobinopathy

Contraindications for proximal blocking:

1. Existence of previous trauma or anatomical distortion of the area that prevents the abduction of the arm
2. Active presence of infection at the locoregional anesthesia puncture site
3. Previous axillary lymphadenopathy
4. Previous history of local anesthetic allergy
5. Severe coagulopathy
6. Severe pre-existing neurological diseases in the upper extremity

Contraindications for WALANT anesthetic technique
7. Documented hypersensitivity to lidocaine
8. Compromised peripheral circulation
9. Patients with previous vascular pathology, a history of vasculitis, Buerger's disease, and scleroderma
10. Patients with infection of the area surrounding the injection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ana Scott-Tennent

Principal investigator. Orthopaedic surgeon in Upper Extremity department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ana Scott-Tennent, Miss

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Arnau Vilanova

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Arnau Vilanova

Lleida, Segria, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEIC-2360

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Wrist Arthroscopy Study
NCT04457362 COMPLETED NA
Lower Tourniquet Pressure Study
NCT04994405 COMPLETED NA
AIN Transfer for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
NCT05242302 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2