Quality Improvement re: Choosing Wisely Back Pain Measures
NCT ID: NCT05413070
Last Updated: 2023-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
125 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-06-15
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Influence of an Educational Intervention in the Beliefs and Attitudes of Primary Care Professionals
NCT02962817
Multimodal Intervention in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: the HEALTHY BACK Project
NCT06114264
Effects of Motivational Interviewing on Self-Efficacy and Standardized Low Back Pain Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Back Pain"
NCT00170118
The Effect of Reducing Sedentary Behaviour in Comparison to Promoting Physical Activity on Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain in a Sedentary Population
NCT04610905
Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of Two Measures of Pain Intensity in People With Low Back Pain
NCT06270069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As a participant in Smarter Care Virginia (SCV), Carilion receives data showing each Carilion Clinic clinician's performance on SCV measures, including the two back pain measures. For example, Carilion receives a database that lists the clinician's name, department, number of appropriate orders for each SCV measure made and the number of low-value orders for each SCV measure made. Carilion (and the other 7 participating health systems) are asked to use this information to generate quality improvement initiatives. We have designed a quality improvement initiative focused on family and community medicine clinicians and the two back pain measures.
First, we will use the most recent data provided by the SCV project (2020 and Q1-Q2 of 2021) to rank FCM practices and clinicians by utilization of low-value back pain services, their waste index, and impact score. We will identify from this ranking the top 5 to 10 performing practices and the bottom 5 to 10 performing practices. If there are any outlier clinicians who are bottom performing (ie: provide the most low-value services or have the highest impact score) but who do not fall among the bottom performing practices, we will consider including their practice among the bottom 5 to 10.
We will survey clinicians in top and bottom performing practices to learn more about their knowledge, perceptions, and practice workflow related to the two back pain measures. They will also be asked about their trust in data measures. No identifying information will be collected from clinicians in the survey.
From what we learn from survey data, we will design up to four brief education points to be communicated during regular practice quality improvement meetings with population health managers.
Prior to the delivery of quality improvement education about back pain measures, we will obtain an EMR report for the top and bottom performing practices showing utilization rate of both back pain measures. We will also conduct a chart review (Epic) to identify indication for provision of the back pain services that could not be detected in claims data or Epic data. This addresses a common concern of clinicians - that clinical nuance is not being detected and low value care is being over-assigned. The Epic reports and chart reviews will continue monthly for the first 3 months and then at months 6 and 12.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lowest Performing Practices
This is the group of 5 to 10 primary care practices that incurred the highest amount of low-value back pain imaging based on claims data reports. This group will receive the survey and the intervention (brief training sessions in existing quality improvement meetings, performance reports, etc.).
Multimodal approach to QI for Low-Value Care
Up to 4 brief educational components in existing quality meetings Informational email/newsletter Individualized performance feedback reports Educational resources for patients
Highest Performing Practices
This is the group of 5 primary care practices that incurred the lowest amount of low-value back pain imaging based on claims data reports. This group will only receive the survey.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multimodal approach to QI for Low-Value Care
Up to 4 brief educational components in existing quality meetings Informational email/newsletter Individualized performance feedback reports Educational resources for patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Center for Health Innovation
UNKNOWN
Carilion Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michelle Rockwell
Senior Research Associate
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carilion Clinic Dept of Family and Community Medicine
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-22-1568
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.