Implementation of a Best Practice Primary Health Care Model for Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT03147300

Last Updated: 2019-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

467 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

POPULATION: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem commonly requiring health care. In Sweden, primary care professionals require an evidenced based model of care for LBP.

INTERVENTION: The multi-faceted implementation of a best practice BetterBack model of care for LBP.

CONTROL: Current routine practice for LBP care before implementation of the BetterBack model of care.

OUTCOME: Patient reported measures (function, activity, health), therapist reported measures (diagnosis, intervention, specialist referral, best practice self-confidence, determinants of implementation) and cost-effectiveness.

AIM: To deliver best practice recommendations for LBP and study their most effective implementation through the BetterBack model of care.

METHOD: A cluster randomised trial with dog leg design. The hypothesis is that the BetterBack model of care will result in significantly better patient and therapist outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness compared to current routine care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low back pain (LBP) is a major health and socioeconomic burden. LBP is usually a result of benign dysfunction and context that affects the patient's perception of pain and limits their activity and participation. At present there are no national clinical guidelines or best practice models of care in Sweden focused on the primary care of low back pain. Implementation of a model of LBP primary care based on international evidence-based guidelines is needed to improve care and patient outcomes in Sweden. This project aims to investigate the effectiveness of a best practice model of care (BetterBack) for the primary care management of LBP. A cluster randomised trial with dog leg design will be conducted in the Östergötland Health care region. The hypothesis is that the BetterBack model of care will result in significantly better patient and therapist reported outcomes as well as cost-effectiveness compared to current routine care. This by improved patient outcomes in terms of physical function, low back pain intensity, activity level, work and quality of life. Furthermore, improved care processes and knowledge support for physiotherapists can lead to a smaller proportion of patients requiring specialist care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

A cluster randomised trial with dog leg design
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants are blinded to assignment to the control or intervention grouping

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Östergötland region - Control group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Current routine practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Current routine practice for the primary care management of LBP

Östergötland region - Intervention group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Multifaceted implementation of the BetterBack

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The multifaceted intervention is composed of the following:

1. Forming an implementation forum including head of departments/managers of the rehabilitation units and the clinical researchers.
2. Forming a support team comprised of experience clinicians as local supervisors and faculty researchers as knowledge facilitators.
3. Developing the Betterback model of care through a collaboration of the implementation forum, support team and international experts.
4. Forming and delivering a 2-day package of education and training that the support team can utilize to assist the use of the BetterBack model of care by clinicians.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Current routine practice

Current routine practice for the primary care management of LBP

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Multifaceted implementation of the BetterBack

The multifaceted intervention is composed of the following:

1. Forming an implementation forum including head of departments/managers of the rehabilitation units and the clinical researchers.
2. Forming a support team comprised of experience clinicians as local supervisors and faculty researchers as knowledge facilitators.
3. Developing the Betterback model of care through a collaboration of the implementation forum, support team and international experts.
4. Forming and delivering a 2-day package of education and training that the support team can utilize to assist the use of the BetterBack model of care by clinicians.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Registered physiotherapists practicing in the allocated clinics and regularly working with patients with LBP

Patient sample


* Males and females 18-65 years; Fluent in Swedish; Accessing public primary care due to a current episode of a first-time or recurrent debut of benign low back pain with or without radiculopathy

Exclusion Criteria

* Current diagnosis of malignancy, spinal fracture, infection, cauda equine syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis or systemic rheumatic disease, previous malignancy during the past 5 years; Current pregnancy or previous pregnancy up to 3 months before consideration of inclusion; Patients that fulfill criteria for multimodal/multi-professional rehabilitation for complex longstanding pain; Severe psychiatric diagnosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Linkoeping University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allan Abbott

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allan Abbott, Msc Physio, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Linkoeping University

Birgitta Abbott, MSc Physio, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Linkoeping University

Paul Enthoven, MSc Physio, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Linkoeping University

Karin Schröder, MSc Physio

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Linkoeping University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Östergötland health care region

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schroder K, Oberg B, Enthoven P, Kongsted A, Abbott A. Confidence, attitudes, beliefs and determinants of implementation behaviours among physiotherapists towards clinical management of low back pain before and after implementation of the BetterBack model of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 19;20(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05197-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32430047 (View on PubMed)

Abbott A, Schroder K, Enthoven P, Nilsen P, Oberg B. Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context: an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 24;8(4):e019906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019906.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29691246 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BetterBack

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trial on Subacute Low Back Pain
NCT00923429 COMPLETED NA