Comparison of Two Approach in Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Catheterizations

NCT ID: NCT05409768

Last Updated: 2023-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ultrasound guidance in central venous catheterization has become the standard for clinical practice. Many approaches have been described in ultrasound guided catheterization procedures. The aim of this study is to compare the classical short axis out of plane (SAX-OOP) approach and the new anteroposterior short axis in plane (APSAX-IP approach in central jugular venous catheterization. The study was planned as prospective randomized and controlled. One hundred patients were planned to be included in this study.

Patients will be divided into two groups: Central jugular vein catheterization will be performed with the short axis out of plane group (ultrasound transducer will be positioned classically from medial to lateral in the neck) and anteroposterior short axis in plane group (ultrasound transducer will be positioned laterally from anterior to posterior on the neck). The two groups will be compared in terms of number of puncture attempts, duration of the procedure, ultrasound scan time before the procedure, number of needle redirection, overall success rate, complications, ease of catheterization and ultrasound visibility.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Central venous catheterization is a method frequently used in intensive care patients and patients to be operated. With classical methods, this central venous vascular access procedure in the landmark method can be performed or it can be successfully performed under ultrasound guidance.

Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization is a safer and recommended approach. During venous catheterization with ultrasound the vein and its neighborhood can be easily visualized and it can be followed while the needle is directed to the target in vein puncture. Undesirable complications (hematoma, pneumothorax, arterial puncture) also decrease with the decrease in the number of punctures under ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound guided central catheterization which facilitates safer and faster procedures constitutes an important area for patient care. With the development of technology and the increase in accessibility it constitutes an important and useful area in the interventions made with ultrasound. The internal jugular vein is a frequently chosen central venous structure.

Many ultrasound-guided imaging and intervention methods have been described for catheterization of the internal jugular vein with the Seldinger method. These are described as longitudinal (long axis), transverse (short axis) and oblique methods for imaging and probe position. The image taken with the position of the needle relative to the ultrasound probe is described as in plane and out of plane.

Each method may have advantages over each other and can be preferred according to the patient's condition and the experience of the practitioner. Successful and safe catheterizations can be performed in the internal jugular vein with the short axis out-of-plane (SAX-OOP) method which is especially used in adults . Short axis out of plane is a successful method that can almost be called a classic that comes to mind first. Compared to other needle imaging methods out of plane tracking of the needle (as a point) seems to be a disadvantage in the user's imaging compared to the in-plane tracking method. Of course, it is easier and faster to capture the short axis when imaging the venous structure as long axis or short axis with ultrasound.

The " Anteroposterior short axis in plane" (APSAX-IP) technique is first reported by Aithal G. et al. in 2019. The use of both short axis and in-plane approaches has been described.The difference of the anteroposterior short axis in plane (APSAX-IP ) technique from the classical short axis out of plane (SAX-OOP) technique is that the location of the ultrasound is lateral to the neck, the needle is about 2-3 cm away from the ultrasound, the entry area from the skin, the needle is advanced subcutaneously in the anteroposterior direction, not medially, and the needle is not as a point in ultrasound that can be viewed longitudinally. It is thought that the APSAX-IP method has advantages such as easier follow-up of the needle, easier monitoring of the progression of the needle without damaging the posterior wall by seeing a large anterior posterior diameter of the vessel. It is stated that the APSAX-IP method will be more ergonomic in patients with short neck anatomy, obese and pediatric patients due to the location of the ultrasound probe. One method may be preferred over the other in patients. Although the definition of the method has been made, it has not been compared with any catheterization method. The aim of our study is to compare the classical SAX-OOP method and the newly defined APSAX-IP method in terms of difficulty, needle puncture time, needle procedure time and complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Central Venous Catheterization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Short axis, out of plane approach

A linear ultrasound probe will be utilized to place the central catheter into the jugular vein with a short axis out of the plane method

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Short axis out of plane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A standard 20 cm (adult-size) 3-port central catheter will be placed to the indicated patients by using standard Seldinger technique (with the assist of a guide wire) under ultrasound guidance short axis visualisation out of plane approaches.

Short axis, anteroposterior in plane approach

A linear ultrasound probe will be utilized to place the central catheter into the jugular vein with an anteroposterior short axis in-plane method

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anteroposterior short axis in plane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A standard 20 cm (adult-size) 3-port central catheter will be placed to the indicated patients by using standard Seldinger technique (with the assist of a guide wire) under ultrasound guidance anteroposterior short axis visualisation in plane approaches.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Short axis out of plane

A standard 20 cm (adult-size) 3-port central catheter will be placed to the indicated patients by using standard Seldinger technique (with the assist of a guide wire) under ultrasound guidance short axis visualisation out of plane approaches.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anteroposterior short axis in plane

A standard 20 cm (adult-size) 3-port central catheter will be placed to the indicated patients by using standard Seldinger technique (with the assist of a guide wire) under ultrasound guidance anteroposterior short axis visualisation in plane approaches.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultrasound guided central venous catheterization with short axis out of plane approach Ultrasound guided central venous catheterization with anteroposterior short axis in plane approach

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients that are planned a central venous catheter placement

Exclusion Criteria

* Morbid obese patients (body mass index\> 40)
* People with severe coagulopathy
* Severe deformity at the neck
* Skin deformity or infection at catheterization site
* Congenital anomalies of central veins
* Emergency operations
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abant Izzet Baysal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ilker Ital

Assistant Professor Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ilker Ital, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Abant İzzet Baysal Education and Training Hospital

Bolu, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine

Bolu, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status COMPLETED

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ilker Ital, MD

Role: CONTACT

(0374) 253 46 56

Murat Bilgi, MD

Role: CONTACT

(0374) 253 46 56

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aithal G, Muthuswamy G, Latif Z, Bhaskaran V, Haji Sani HS, Shindhe S, Manap NBA, Vadaje KS, Dato Paduka Buntar WS, Daiwajna RG. An Alternate In-Plane Technique of Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation. J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):852-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31635927 (View on PubMed)

Ince I, Ari MA, Sulak MM, Aksoy M. [Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis "Syringe-Free" approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 May-Jun;68(3):260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29478705 (View on PubMed)

Aydin T, Balaban O, Turgut M, Tokur ME, Musmul A. A Novel Method for Ultrasound-Guided Central Catheter Placement-Supraclavicular Brachiocephalic Vein Catheterization Versus Jugular Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Apr;36(4):998-1006. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34247928 (View on PubMed)

Rossi UG, Rigamonti P, Ticha V, Zoffoli E, Giordano A, Gallieni M, Cariati M. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided central venous catheters: the lateral in-plane technique for internal jugular vein access. J Vasc Access. 2014 Jan-Feb;15(1):56-60. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000177. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24101418 (View on PubMed)

Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, Reeves ST; Councils on Intraoperative Echocardiography and Vascular Ultrasound of the American Society of Echocardiography; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Special articles: guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society Of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):46-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182407cd8. Epub 2011 Nov 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22127816 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AIBU-TF-AR-II-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.