Nociception Evaluated by the NOL® Index in Sedated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT ID: NCT05399758
Last Updated: 2023-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-06-01
2023-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pain assessment in critically ill patients is challenging; limitations in their ability to communicate (neurocognitive deficit, use of endotracheal tube) or altered consciousness (deep sedation) make them unable to self-report their pain with standard pain scales. The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) are the pain assessment tools with the best performance and reliability for patients in these conditions.
Different technologies are used to monitor nociceptive responses caused by surgical stress in patients under general anesthesia that together with the clinical evaluation, manage to keep patients in the best analgesic conditions, improving the post-surgical prognosis. In particular, the NOL® nociceptive index (Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel) is a multiparametric detection of nociception/pain, delivering a dimensionless score (0 -100) calculated through an algorithm (patented) and based on the registry of four biometric sensors (photoplethysmography, galvanic skin response, temperature, and accelerometer). NOL index value between 10-25 is the most appropriate for maintaining analgesia during general anesthesia.
The ease and low invasiveness of this system (all sensors are implemented in a finger clip, similar to an oxygen saturation monitor) may allow its potential use in the context of intensive care unit patients. Some studies have recently been published that highlight the possible usefulness of the NOL® index in critically ill patients. However, in these studies, the assessment of nociception was limited to acute nociceptive procedures only.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analgesia-Based Sedation During Mechanical Ventilation
NCT00403208
Hemodynamic and Biological Evaluations During Reventilation Collapse in ICU
NCT01785654
Precision Sedation in Intensive Care
NCT06991777
Evaluation of an Analgosedation Protocol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
NCT02100735
Sleep Bundle for Improving Sleep in ICU Patients
NCT03247062
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aims to describe the feasibility of using the NOL® nociception index as an objective tool for assessing pain/nociception in patients with sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
The values obtained with the use of the NOL® index will be recorded and compared with the standard measurements of pain assessment (Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and/or Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)) in patients with a deep/superficial sedation protocol (SAS 1-2). The values obtained after exposure to nociceptive stimuli such as interventions, cleaning, and invasive procedures, among others, will be registered.
In particular, scales such as CPOT and NOL® can be complementary since both measure different components related to pain. The CPOT measures expressive behaviors related to pain, and the NOL measures physiological parameters involved in the process of nociception, which can lead to pain.
Two other aims:
To compare the registration of the NOL® index and the degree of sedation by the BIS® index with variables derived from the processing of the frontal EEG.
To evaluate the effect of sedo-analgesia protocols on the NOL® index. The impact of administering sedation/analgesia protocols with propofol/fentanyl and their effects on the NOL® index will be followed up and evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ICU sedated patients
Critical patients sedated with propofol and fentanyl The values obtained with the use of the NOL® index will be recorded and compared with the standard measurements of pain assessment (Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and/or CPOT)
NOL monitor
NOL monitor data will be acquired, as well as clinical assessment of pain and fentanyl dosage.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NOL monitor
NOL monitor data will be acquired, as well as clinical assessment of pain and fentanyl dosage.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Stroke
* Opioid user before ICU hospitalization
* Atrial fibrillation
* Pregnancy/lactation
* Patient with antiarrhythmic agents
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chile
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonello Penna
Principal Investigator, Anesthesiologist, MD-PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro de Investigación Cínica Avanzada (CICA), Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile
Santiago, RM, Chile
Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile
Santiago, RM, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OAIC: 1219/21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.