Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-12
2025-02-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Key barriers to successful engagement include: 1) communication issues, such as lack of phone or limited phone access; 2) lack of transportation; 3) significant social issues such as poverty; 4) substance use disorder; and 5) a limited understanding of the consequences of untreated HCV infection. In this mixed-method design, the investigators propose a pilot study that will provide education and resources, such as vouchers for phone, transportation, and meals, to the most vulnerable patients that will facilitate engagement in treatment as additional factors that may influence dropout rates are evaluated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conquering Hepatitis C Via Micro-Elimination in Southwest Virginia
NCT03876470
Improving Hepatitis C Treatment in Injection Drug Users
NCT00148031
Eliminating HCV in Rural South Carolina Utilizing NP Led Mobile Clinics and Virtual Care Coordination
NCT05369507
Hepatitis C in a Cohort of Patients With Maintenance Therapy for Opiate Dependence - Prevalence, Severity and Outcome of Antiviral Therapy
NCT01045278
Treatment as Prevention for Hepatitis C in Iceland
NCT02647879
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators will conduct a qualitative study, informed by current literature, asking patients with a new diagnosis of HCV infection, patients with a history of HCV infection, and providers who specialize in HCV treatment about their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to treatment.
Aim 2: To pilot simple solutions to known basic social problems affecting communication and access to HCV infection care, leveraging peer counselors who are trained in engaging and retaining patients with HCV infection in treatment by bringing earlier, language-appropriate education to patients, while facilitating the LTC process. The investigators will provide time for a Peer Specialist (PS) and vouchers (e.g., for phones, meals, and transportation) to patients at the point of their initial test. The investigators will specifically target people with substance use disorder (PWSD) as our population for this study.
Aim 3: To identify other system-based interventions to address those barriers and optimize the things that will facilitate care and LTC.
The investigators will conduct a local "call-to-action" to leverage local data on the incidence, prevalence, morbidity, and mortality associated with HCV infection, and the findings of our qualitative analysis from specific Aim 1, to identify actionable, sustainable interventions to increase adherence to HCV infection screening, testing, and treatment through systems improvement.
This project seeks to determine whether the interventions (PS, vouchers) influence individual attendance at the first treatment appointment. In addition, what additional factors might be influencing individuals to adhere to their first appointment. Do these individuals find the interventions useful? What other barriers exist?
The investigators will use a mixed methods approach to address these questions. A mixed methods approach was chosen because the quantitative data will allow the investigators to perform descriptive and inferential statistics. The qualitative data will add a richness to our understanding of why our interventions may or may not prove successful.
Qualitative study: This study will help the investigators to understand the extent to which interventions are adopted and what barriers to adoption might exist. The investigators plan to conduct semi-structured key informant interviews with 10 patients and 10 care providers. Interviews will last approximately 30 minutes. Barriers and facilitators (or perceived barriers and facilitators for care providers) to attendance at the first treatment appointment, will be discussed. It is anticipated to use the social-ecological model as a framework and will use axial coding for analysis. The output of this aim is anticipated to be a list of barriers and facilitators (Aim 1). The output of this aim will help to frame additional intervention studies in the future (Aim 3).
Quantitative study: Two types of intervention will be tested. The first is the provision of a PS, and the second is the use of vouchers (food, transportation, phone) to facilitate LTC. These two interventions are linked in this study (see limitations section). Our hypothesis is that this intervention will lead to a greater likelihood of the individual attending their first treatment appointment. Individuals that have a new diagnosis of HCV infection from the Carilion Clinic system will be provided a PS and specific vouchers based on the specialist's assessment of their specific needs at the time of their initial diagnosis. PS's work from the perspective of their lived experience with mental illness/substance use disorder and recovery. Being a PS requires being open about having been diagnosed with a mental illness or substance use disorder. This openness is to help educate others about the reality and the possibility of recovery. The investigators plan to work with them to help patients with substance use disorders and HCV infection to engage in the benefits of HCV treatment as well as to facilitate LTC.
The investigators will use a pragmatic trial (quasi-experimental) approach; specifically, an interrupted time-series design (3 phases) and analysis. The investigators will compare a sample of individuals newly diagnosed with HCV infection pre-implementation to a post-implementation sample, with a short washout period in the middle (phase 1-pre; phase 2-washout; phase 3-post). This is a between-subjects design. Our main measure of interest is attendance at the initial treatment appointment. Although an accurate power calculation is difficult, it is estimated that for an effect size of 2, an n of 36 per phase (36 pre and 36 post), should allow for detection of a 0.05 significant difference between pre- and post-implementation.19 This calculation is based on an assumption of no auto-correlation. The investigators anticipate using an ANOVA for statistical comparisons. The output of this analysis will be a preliminary test of the relationship of our intervention and attendance at the first treatment appointment. Since this is a pilot proposal, designed to build collaboration and ensure our processes are reliable, the investigators will also gather qualitative data on the process of giving out vouchers, the availability and use of the PS, and any other process variables of interest (Aim 3).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peer specialist and Vouchers
Intervention arm
Peer specialist (PS) and vouchers
this participants will receive vouchers from PS
Standard of care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peer specialist (PS) and vouchers
this participants will receive vouchers from PS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* elevated Hepatitis C RNA
* history of substance use disorder
Exclusion Criteria
* history of treatment of Hepatitis C infection
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
OTHER
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
NIH
Carilion Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mariana Gomez
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carilion Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-21-1472
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.