Intravascular Lithotripsy in Comparison to Rotational Atherectomy: An Evaluation by OFDI
NCT ID: NCT05394649
Last Updated: 2022-08-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
178 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-04
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rotablation vs Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Lesions
NCT04960319
Microcirculatory Status After Intravascular Lithotripsy
NCT05134051
Observatory on the Use of the Shockwave Medical C2 Coronary Lithotripsy System in the General Population in France.
NCT05113407
Use of Shockwave M5+ IVL Catheter (Intravascular Lithotripsy) in Hostile and Calcified Iliac Access
NCT05880641
Safety and Effectiveness of the Single-Use Coronary Forward Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter Combined With the Intravascular Lithotripsy Therapy Device
NCT07109479
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Intravascular lithotripsy arm
* Rotational Atherectomy arm
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intravascular lithotripsy arm
Preparation of calcified lesions by intravascular lithotripsy before stenting
Intravascular Lithotripsy
A new device has been designed by Shockwave Medical Inc. for the treatment of calcified vascular lesions to support stent delivery: the "C2 Shockwave Medical® (IVL), Inc. coronary lithotripsy system". The system is based on lithotripsy to induce microfractures in the calcified plaque before low-pressure balloon dilation. The C2 Shockwave Medical® coronary lithotripsy (IVL) system consists of an IVL Catheter with two lithotripsy emitters enclosed within an integrated balloon, an IVL Generator, and an IVL Connector Cable.
Rotational Atherectomy arm
Preparation of calcified lesions by rotational atherectomy before stenting
Rotational Atherectomy
Rotational Atherectomy is a technique of calcic coronary plaque preparation based on the debulking of superficial calcium by a high-speed burr in order to improve vessel compliance and immediate vessel lumen gain before stenting.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intravascular Lithotripsy
A new device has been designed by Shockwave Medical Inc. for the treatment of calcified vascular lesions to support stent delivery: the "C2 Shockwave Medical® (IVL), Inc. coronary lithotripsy system". The system is based on lithotripsy to induce microfractures in the calcified plaque before low-pressure balloon dilation. The C2 Shockwave Medical® coronary lithotripsy (IVL) system consists of an IVL Catheter with two lithotripsy emitters enclosed within an integrated balloon, an IVL Generator, and an IVL Connector Cable.
Rotational Atherectomy
Rotational Atherectomy is a technique of calcic coronary plaque preparation based on the debulking of superficial calcium by a high-speed burr in order to improve vessel compliance and immediate vessel lumen gain before stenting.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects with native coronary artery disease (including stable or unstable angina and silent ischemia) suitable for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
3. For patients with unstable ischemic heart disease, biomarkers (troponin or CK-MB) must be less than or equal to the upper limit of the lab (URL) normal within 12 hours prior to the procedure
4. The target lesion must be a de novo coronary lesion that has not been previously treated with any interventional procedure
5. Single de novo target lesion stenosis of protected LMCA, or LAD, RCA, or LCX (or of their branches) with:
1. Stenosis of ≥70% and \<100%
2. or Stenosis ≥50% and \<70% (visually assessed) with evidence of ischemia via positive stress test, or fractional flow reserve value ≤0.80
6. The target vessel reference diameter must be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.0 mm
7. The lesion length must not exceed 40 mm
8. The target vessel must have TIMI flow 3 at baseline
9. Evidence of calcification at the lesion with a B or C Mintz classification site:
B: Moderate calcification: radiopacities are noted only during the cardiac cycle before contrast injection C: severe calcification: radiopacities are seen without cardiac motion, also before contrast injection, usually affecting both sides of the arterial lumen.
10. Ability to pass a 0.014" guidewire across the lesion
11. Ability to cross target lesion with a 2 mm balloon
12. Patient insured under the French healthcare system ("Régime National Assurance Maladie")
13. Lesions in non-target vessels requiring PCI may be treated either:
* a. \>30 days prior to the study procedure if the procedure was unsuccessful or complicated; or
* b. \>24 hours prior to the study procedure if the procedure was successful and uncomplicated (defined as a final lesion angiographic diameter stenosis \<30% and TIMI 3 flow (visually assessed) for all non-target lesions and vessels without perforation, cardiac arrest or need for defibrillation or cardioversion or hypotension/heart failure requiring mechanical or intravenous hemodynamic support or intubation, and with no post-procedure biomarker elevation \>normal; or
* c. \>30 days after the study procedure d. Could be treated in the same time of the diagnosis coronarography with respect of the delay for the index procedure of the protocol as described above
14. Patient able to assess and understand the risks and benefits, to accept and participate in the study (by signing an informed consent form and knowledgeable of the information letter).
15. Patient accepting the appropriate follow-up as per study definition
Exclusion Criteria
2. The subject is pregnant or nursing
3. Patient refusing to participate in the study or unable to give informed consent (Guardianship, curatorship or judicial safeguard)
4. Any comorbidity or condition which may reduce compliance with this protocol, including follow-up visits
5. The protected subject according to the current legislation (articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-8 of the French Code of Public Health).
6. The subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device), unless it is authorized by the concomitant study protocol.
7. Unable to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (i.e., aspirin, and either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months
8. The subject has an allergy to imaging contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
9. The subject experienced an acute MI (STEMI or non-STEMI) within 30 days prior to index procedure, defined as a clinical syndrome consistent with an acute coronary syndrome with troponin or CK-MB greater than 1 time the local laboratory's upper normal limit
10. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure
11. History of a stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) within 6 months, or any prior intracranial hemorrhage
12. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 6 months
13. Uncontrolled diabetes defined as an HbA1c \>10%
14. Subjects in cardiogenic shock
15. Subject has an active systemic infection on the day of the index procedure with either fever, leukocytosis or requiring intravenous antibiotics
16. Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 1 year
17. Non-coronary interventional or surgical structural heart procedures (e.g., TAVR, MitraClip, LAA, or PFO occlusion…) within 30 days prior to the index procedure
18. Planned non-coronary interventional or surgical structural heart procedures (e.g., TAVR, MitraClip, LAA or PFO occlusion...)
19. Subject refusing or not a candidate for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery
20. High SYNTAX Score (≥33) if assessed as a standard of care, unless the local heart team has met and recommends PCI is the most appropriate treatment for the patient
21. Definite or possible thrombus (by angiography or intravascular imaging) in the target vessel
22. Evidence of aneurysm in target vessel within 10 mm of the target Lesion
23. Unprotected left main
24. Target lesion is located in a native vessel that can only be reached by going through a saphenous vein or arterial bypass graft
25. Angiographic evidence of dissection in the target vessel at baseline or after guidewire passage
26. Ejection fraction less than 30 % evaluated in TTE, angiography or MRI
27. Patient suffering of lymphoma, leukemia and other malignancies
28. Patient suffering of liver disease
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinique Pasteur Toulouse
OTHER
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe SAnté Victor Pauchet
Amiens, , France
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon, , France
CHU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, , France
CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Clinique Saint Augustin
Bordeaux, , France
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
GH Mutualiste Grenoble
Grenoble, , France
Institut Cardiologique Paris sud
Massy, , France
Clinique du Millénaire
Montpellier, , France
Clinique Pasteur
Nancy, , France
Nouvelle Clinique Nantaise
Nantes, , France
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes, , France
Hôpital Européen de Paris GVM la Roseraie
Paris, , France
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, , France
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Clinique Saint Hilaire
Rouen, , France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Lise Laclautre
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RBHP 2021 HONTON
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.