Gardasil Versus Cervarix in the Treatment of Warts

NCT ID: NCT05383625

Last Updated: 2022-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Warts are common, benign, epidermal proliferations caused by HPV infecting skin and mucous membranes. Treatment of warts poses a true challenge despite existing variable therapeutic modalities, whether destructive or immunotherapeutic. Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines are FDA approved for the prevention of genital warts and wart related precancerous and cancerous lesions but they are not indicated for treatment of preexisting warts yet

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately 35% of viral warts tend to be recalcitrant either showing no response to treatment or having prompt recurrences after treatment, causing frustration for both patients and physicians. Success rates vary significantly across patients and across different therapeutic interventions ranging from 7% to 90%.

Immunotherapy is proposed to enhance virus recognition by the cell mediated immunity, which allows the clearance of both treated and untreated warts and helps to prevent recurrences through induction of a long-term acquired immunity to HPV.

Few reports suggest the possibility of using quadrivalent or bivalent HPV vaccines as therapeutic modality rather than only preventive modality. This is a randomized controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of quadrivalent and bivalent HPV vaccines in the treatment of warts

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Verruca Viral

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quadrivalent vaccine

Patient receive 0.1 ml of quadrivalent HPV vaccine intralesional every two weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (Types 6,11,16,18) Recombinant Vaccine

Intervention Type DRUG

intralesional 0.1 ml every two weeks

Bivalent Vaccine

Patient received 0.1 ml of bivalent HPV vaccine intralesional once every two weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bivalent Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intralesional 0.1 ml every two weeks

Saline control

Patient received 0.1 ml of intralesional saline once every two weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

intralesional into the largest warts every two weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (Types 6,11,16,18) Recombinant Vaccine

intralesional 0.1 ml every two weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Bivalent Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine

Intralesional 0.1 ml every two weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

intralesional into the largest warts every two weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult Patients with recalcitrant multiple warts of any type. Warts were considered recalcitrant if they persisted for at least 6 months without any response to 2 different therapeutic modalities or more.
* Immunocompetent patients.
* Patients who do not receive any treatment of warts for at least 1 month before the start of study.

* Patients who are able to understand and follow the study protocol and approve to sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with acute febrile illness.
* Past history of asthma.
* Allergic skin disorders, such as generalized eczema, or severe urticaria.
* Pregnancy or lactation

* History of hypersensitivity to the treatment vaccines.
* Children
* Immunocompromised patients
* Patients unable to follow the study protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hagar Nofal

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dermatology department, Zagazig University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University

Zagazig, Select Region, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nofal A, Marei A, Amer A, Amen H. Significance of interferon gamma in the prediction of successful therapy of common warts by intralesional injection of Candida antigen. Int J Dermatol. 2017 Oct;56(10):1003-1009. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13709. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28791682 (View on PubMed)

Nofal A, Marei A, Ibrahim AM, Nofal E, Nabil M. Intralesional versus intramuscular bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the treatment of recalcitrant common warts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jan;82(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.070. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31369771 (View on PubMed)

Nofal A, Nofal E, Yosef A, Nofal H. Treatment of recalcitrant warts with intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: a promising approach. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jun;54(6):667-71. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12480. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25070525 (View on PubMed)

Landis MN, Lookingbill DP, Sluzevich JC. Recalcitrant plantar warts treated with recombinant quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Aug;67(2):e73-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.08.022. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22794819 (View on PubMed)

Kreuter A, Waterboer T, Wieland U. Regression of cutaneous warts in a patient with WILD syndrome following recombinant quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Oct;146(10):1196-7. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.290. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20956677 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZU-IRB#5859/15-1-2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.