Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine Immunotherapy for Warts

NCT ID: NCT05326152

Last Updated: 2022-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-25

Study Completion Date

2021-10-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Assessment of the effectiveness of intralesional and intramuscular hepatitis B vaccine in treatment of multiple common warts.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recently, intralesional immunotherapy by different antigens, including Candida antigen and purified protein derivative PPD has been proved effective in the treatment of different types of warts. Hepatitis B vaccine is one of the DNA vaccines that are regarded as being potentially safer, relatively cheap and easy to produce with no special storage requirements because they are extremely stable and allow for potential simultaneous immunization against multiple antigens or pathogens via co-expression of multiple epitopes on single plasmid. Hepatitis B vaccine could be a promising immunotherapeutic vaccine in the field of intralesional immunotherapy of warts. Moreover, the efficacy of intramuscular injection of hepatitis B vaccine would be assessed and compared to its intralesional injection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intralesional Versus Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccine for Multiple Common Warts

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IntralesionaL Hepatitis B vaccine

0.2 ml of hepatitis B vaccine injected in the largest wart and repeated every 2 weeks till clearance of warts or for a maximum of 5 sessions

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Randomized placebo-controlled comparative effectiveness clinical trial

Intramuscular Hepatitis B vaccine

0.5 ml injected in the deltoid muscle for those who were younger than 19 years at the time of study and 1 ml for those who were 20 years and older at the time of study.

Three injections were done at 0, 1, and 4 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Randomized placebo-controlled comparative effectiveness clinical trial

Intralesional saline

0.2 ml of saline injected in the largest wart and repeated every 2 weeks till clearance of warts or for a maximum of 5 sessions

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Intralesional saline

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intralesional saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hepatitis B vaccine immunotherapy of common warts (GeneVac-B 10 ml vial, Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India)

Randomized placebo-controlled comparative effectiveness clinical trial

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intralesional saline

Intralesional saline

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult patients of both sexes with multiple (\> 3 warts) common warts of various sites, sizes and duration, with or without distant warts after taking informed consent from all patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Serious systemic or anaphylactic reaction to a prior dose of the vaccine or to any of its components.
* Allergic skin disorders such as generalized eczema and urticaria.
* Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever.
* Previous wart therapy within 1 month prior to the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Basma Magdy Elkholy, MD

Clinical professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zagazig university

Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB# 6547/-25-11-2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Microwave Treatment of Common and Plantar Warts
NCT05371834 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA