Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-19
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Dose-finding Study
NCT03957304
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair
NCT02168439
IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric ED
NCT05934669
Safety & Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl & Midazolam in the Pediatric Emergency Room
NCT05057689
Intranasal Midazolam for Treatment of Anxiety in Children Undergoing Suturing in the Pediatric Emergency Department
NCT02618772
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
IN dexmedetomidine is a relatively new anxiolytic with sedative and analgesic properties. It is tasteless, non-irritative, and highly concentrated (100 mcg/mL). A maximum dose of 200 mcg/2 mL can be given with 2 pairs of 0.5 mL IN sprays. The investigator's team published a systematic review of IN dexmedetomidine for distressing procedures. It was well tolerated by more than 90% of children and provided adequate anxiolysis in more children (79%) versus conventional anxiolytics (midazolam, chloral hydrate) (60%). Only one trial investigated IN dexmedetomidine in children for laceration repair and 70% were deemed "not anxious" compared to IN midazolam (11%). However, the study focused on initial positioning rather than repair. For proof of concept and to identify the optimal dose and feasibility of IN dexmedetomidine, we completed a pilot of 55 children undergoing laceration repair. All children tolerated IN administration, the consent rate was 82%, and there were no serious adverse events (AE). A dose of 3 mcg/kg balanced efficacy with duration of sedation, in line with others' findings.
Oral midazolam is the most common anxiolytic for laceration repair in children. However, onset and duration of action and efficacy can be unreliable and its bitter taste leads to poor compliance. IN midazolam using a mucosal atomizer device (MAD) is increasingly popular because it overcomes these limitations. Compared to oral midazolam, IN midazolam has a shorter onset of action (28 vs 34 minutes) but causes nasal irritation in up to 40% of patients. In addition, IN midazolam has variable efficacy for laceration repair and more adverse effects compared to nitrous oxide or IN dexmedetomidine. The largest study of IN midazolam was a retrospective study of combination IN midazolam plus fentanyl. A lower dose of midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) resulted in fewer adverse effects (0.7%) than with higher doses (2-5%). Adding IN fentanyl provided superior efficacy where only 2.4% of patients experienced a treatment failure.
The second most common anxiolytic is inhaled N2O, a tasteless gas that is administered in a concentration of 30-70% with oxygen. N2O is safe and effective for minor painful procedures. Peak effect is rapid (2 minutes) and effects dissipate quickly (3 minutes) upon discontinuation. Minor adverse effects occur in less than 10% of patients. However, based on the United Kingdom National Clinical Guideline Centre, it's unclear whether uncooperative children will comply with N2O administration. The investigators' recently completed systematic review of 29 trials of N2O for painful procedures in children found 50% N2O was superior to subcutaneous lidocaine, placebo, and oral midazolam. Only 5 trials focused on laceration repair but they were small and limited by non-validated or no measures of anxiety .
Despite frequent use of anxiolytics such as midazolam and N2O, The investigators' national survey found that 80% of Canadian paediatric ED physicians strongly believed that "children experience significant enough distress to warrant anxiolysis" and it would "improve the patient care experience". To improve care, a rigorous trial of a novel anxiolytic, IN dexmedetomidine, and dissemination of the research findings is needed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intranasal dexmedetomidine
IN dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg \[100 mcg/mL (max 200 mcg or 2 mL)\]
Dexmedetomidine
Intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg \[100 mcg/mL (max 200 mcg or 2 mL)
Intranasal midazolam
IN midazolam 0.4 mg/kg \[5 mg/mL (max 10 mg or 2 mL)\]
Midazolam Nasal Spray
Intranasal midazolam 0.4 mg/kg \[5 mg/mL (max 10 mg or 2 mL)
Inhaled nitrous oxide
50% N2O in 50% oxygen by face mask or on-demand system
Nitrous oxide
50% nitrous oxide in 50% oxygen by face mask
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
Intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg \[100 mcg/mL (max 200 mcg or 2 mL)
Midazolam Nasal Spray
Intranasal midazolam 0.4 mg/kg \[5 mg/mL (max 10 mg or 2 mL)
Nitrous oxide
50% nitrous oxide in 50% oxygen by face mask
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ii) Hypersensitivity to any intervention iii) Occlusion of \> 1 nostril due to polyps, septal deviation, or foreign body (may prevent drug absorption) iv) Hemodynamic abnormalities: bradycardia or hypotension \< 2 SD of age-related normal value v) IND contraindications: Pre-existing renal insufficiency, uncorrected mineralocorticoid deficiency, pulmonary hypertension, uncorrected cyanotic heart disease, cardiac conduction disorder, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary edema, vitamin B12 or folate disorder, phenylketonuria, or psychosis vi) Sedation contraindications: Impaired level of consciousness or respiratory instability vii) N2O contraindications: Conditions associated with potential accumulation of gas within body spaces viii) Suspected or confirmed pregnancy (as reported by patient) ix) Inability to vocalize pain due to motor deficits (unable to apply the OSBD-R) x) Caregiver unable to complete study tasks due to insufficient comprehension of either English or French in the absence of a native language interpreter xi) Weight \>= 65 kg (to avoid under-dosing of INM or IND) x) Not American Society of Anesthesiologists class I (healthy) or II (controlled mild to moderate disease) xii) No concomitant fracture or dislocation requiring orthopedic manipulation
2 Years
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Naveen Poonai, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jiang A, Poonai N, Arthur-Hayward V, Heath A. Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: statistical analysis plan for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE). Trials. 2025 Aug 7;26(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09009-z.
Poonai N, Arthur-Hayward V, Ali S, Sabhaney V, Doan Q, Trottier E, Gravel J, Tran NA, Bhatt M, Eltorki M, Thull-Freedman J, Leung J, Beer D, Jiang A, Poolacherla R, Heath A. Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: study protocol for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE). PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0324515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324515. eCollection 2025.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DFS05081977
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.