Anxiolysis for Laceration Repair in Children

NCT ID: NCT05383495

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-19

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a 3-arm adaptive clinical trial to the optimal light sedative for reducing distress during laceration repair in children. The investigators will compare intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine, IN midazolam, and nitrous oxide (N20). The primary outcome is the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress - Revised (OSBD-R).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Accounting for almost half of all procedures performed, lacerations are the most common reason for an ED visit in children. There is consistent evidence that children experience considerable distress during laceration repair, despite routine application of topical anesthetic, lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine (LET). Certified child life specialists (CCLSs) can help children cope with distress but are not widely available. Untreated distress in childhood can lead to anxiety, needle phobia, and fear of medical care as adults. The American Academy of Pediatrics and American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry strongly recommend minimizing discomfort and controlling behavior and movement during procedures but there is no specific guidance on laceration repair. Many children require pharmacologic anxiolysis for laceration repair but evidence for the most effective agent is lacking. Although anxiolytics such as midazolam and nitrous oxide (N2O) are frequently used, there are drawbacks including variable efficacy and nasal irritation in the case of midazolam and lack of cooperation in younger children in the case of N2O. IN dexmedetomidine is a potentially effective anxiolytic for laceration repair that could overcome these limitations.

IN dexmedetomidine is a relatively new anxiolytic with sedative and analgesic properties. It is tasteless, non-irritative, and highly concentrated (100 mcg/mL). A maximum dose of 200 mcg/2 mL can be given with 2 pairs of 0.5 mL IN sprays. The investigator's team published a systematic review of IN dexmedetomidine for distressing procedures. It was well tolerated by more than 90% of children and provided adequate anxiolysis in more children (79%) versus conventional anxiolytics (midazolam, chloral hydrate) (60%). Only one trial investigated IN dexmedetomidine in children for laceration repair and 70% were deemed "not anxious" compared to IN midazolam (11%). However, the study focused on initial positioning rather than repair. For proof of concept and to identify the optimal dose and feasibility of IN dexmedetomidine, we completed a pilot of 55 children undergoing laceration repair. All children tolerated IN administration, the consent rate was 82%, and there were no serious adverse events (AE). A dose of 3 mcg/kg balanced efficacy with duration of sedation, in line with others' findings.

Oral midazolam is the most common anxiolytic for laceration repair in children. However, onset and duration of action and efficacy can be unreliable and its bitter taste leads to poor compliance. IN midazolam using a mucosal atomizer device (MAD) is increasingly popular because it overcomes these limitations. Compared to oral midazolam, IN midazolam has a shorter onset of action (28 vs 34 minutes) but causes nasal irritation in up to 40% of patients. In addition, IN midazolam has variable efficacy for laceration repair and more adverse effects compared to nitrous oxide or IN dexmedetomidine. The largest study of IN midazolam was a retrospective study of combination IN midazolam plus fentanyl. A lower dose of midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) resulted in fewer adverse effects (0.7%) than with higher doses (2-5%). Adding IN fentanyl provided superior efficacy where only 2.4% of patients experienced a treatment failure.

The second most common anxiolytic is inhaled N2O, a tasteless gas that is administered in a concentration of 30-70% with oxygen. N2O is safe and effective for minor painful procedures. Peak effect is rapid (2 minutes) and effects dissipate quickly (3 minutes) upon discontinuation. Minor adverse effects occur in less than 10% of patients. However, based on the United Kingdom National Clinical Guideline Centre, it's unclear whether uncooperative children will comply with N2O administration. The investigators' recently completed systematic review of 29 trials of N2O for painful procedures in children found 50% N2O was superior to subcutaneous lidocaine, placebo, and oral midazolam. Only 5 trials focused on laceration repair but they were small and limited by non-validated or no measures of anxiety .

Despite frequent use of anxiolytics such as midazolam and N2O, The investigators' national survey found that 80% of Canadian paediatric ED physicians strongly believed that "children experience significant enough distress to warrant anxiolysis" and it would "improve the patient care experience". To improve care, a rigorous trial of a novel anxiolytic, IN dexmedetomidine, and dissemination of the research findings is needed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laceration of Skin Distress, Emotional

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Phase III, multicentre, open-label, randomized, three-arm, adaptive trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intranasal dexmedetomidine

IN dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg \[100 mcg/mL (max 200 mcg or 2 mL)\]

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg \[100 mcg/mL (max 200 mcg or 2 mL)

Intranasal midazolam

IN midazolam 0.4 mg/kg \[5 mg/mL (max 10 mg or 2 mL)\]

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Midazolam Nasal Spray

Intervention Type DRUG

Intranasal midazolam 0.4 mg/kg \[5 mg/mL (max 10 mg or 2 mL)

Inhaled nitrous oxide

50% N2O in 50% oxygen by face mask or on-demand system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nitrous oxide

Intervention Type DRUG

50% nitrous oxide in 50% oxygen by face mask

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 mcg/kg \[100 mcg/mL (max 200 mcg or 2 mL)

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam Nasal Spray

Intranasal midazolam 0.4 mg/kg \[5 mg/mL (max 10 mg or 2 mL)

Intervention Type DRUG

Nitrous oxide

50% nitrous oxide in 50% oxygen by face mask

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Precedex Versed Nitronox

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

i) Age 2-12.99 years \[highest incidence of laceration repair\] ii) Single or grouped lacerations separated by no more than 2 cm for which the treating physician believes repair does not require IV sedation iii) Repair to involve sutures and performed by ED physician or designate (trainee) iv) Child or caregiver desires anxiolysis for laceration repair \[justification: incorporates family preferences based on their prior experiences or beliefs about child's response\] vii) Local anesthesia planned to involve topical anesthetic (LET), infiltrated lidocaine, ring, or thenar block

Exclusion Criteria

i) Sedative, anxiolytic, or alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist \< 24 hours prior to interventions (may compound sedative effect and increase the SAE risk). 24-hours encompasses the duration of sedation of most agents.

ii) Hypersensitivity to any intervention iii) Occlusion of \> 1 nostril due to polyps, septal deviation, or foreign body (may prevent drug absorption) iv) Hemodynamic abnormalities: bradycardia or hypotension \< 2 SD of age-related normal value v) IND contraindications: Pre-existing renal insufficiency, uncorrected mineralocorticoid deficiency, pulmonary hypertension, uncorrected cyanotic heart disease, cardiac conduction disorder, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary edema, vitamin B12 or folate disorder, phenylketonuria, or psychosis vi) Sedation contraindications: Impaired level of consciousness or respiratory instability vii) N2O contraindications: Conditions associated with potential accumulation of gas within body spaces viii) Suspected or confirmed pregnancy (as reported by patient) ix) Inability to vocalize pain due to motor deficits (unable to apply the OSBD-R) x) Caregiver unable to complete study tasks due to insufficient comprehension of either English or French in the absence of a native language interpreter xi) Weight \>= 65 kg (to avoid under-dosing of INM or IND) x) Not American Society of Anesthesiologists class I (healthy) or II (controlled mild to moderate disease) xii) No concomitant fracture or dislocation requiring orthopedic manipulation
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Naveen Poonai, MD

Role: CONTACT

5196858500 ext. 52011

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Naveen Poonai, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jiang A, Poonai N, Arthur-Hayward V, Heath A. Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: statistical analysis plan for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE). Trials. 2025 Aug 7;26(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09009-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40775649 (View on PubMed)

Poonai N, Arthur-Hayward V, Ali S, Sabhaney V, Doan Q, Trottier E, Gravel J, Tran NA, Bhatt M, Eltorki M, Thull-Freedman J, Leung J, Beer D, Jiang A, Poolacherla R, Heath A. Anxiolysis for laceration repair in children: study protocol for an open-label multicenter adaptive trial (ALICE). PLoS One. 2025 Jun 4;20(6):e0324515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324515. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40465577 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DFS05081977

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pediatric Delirium
NCT04669457 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4