Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-17
2024-02-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Necrotizing Enterocolitis
NCT03860701
RIC-NEC Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05279664
Sustained Lung Inflation in Preterm Infants
NCT03518762
Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP Versus NIHFV
NCT02267018
Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Feasibility of Resuscitation of Preterm Infants With Controlled Volume of Air/Oxygen
NCT00157989
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a procedure that involves the application of brief cycles of non-lethal ischemia and reperfusion to a remote site, with the goal of protecting distant organs exposed to ischemic injury. RIC has been extensively studied in experimental models and applied clinically in adults, children, and neonates. In neonates, there have been trials exploring its potential role before cardiac surgery and necrotizing enterocolitis. Most of these studies performed up to 4 cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia in a single day and found RIC to be feasible and safe. Experimental studies suggest that RIC, acting through three inter-related mechanisms (neural, humoral, and systemic pathways) is associated with increased cerebral blood flow, decreased inflammation, and enhanced cell survival. RIC has been studied as a potential treatment in adult stroke, and while the evidence to date is inconclusive, preliminary data suggest that RIC may reduce the size and the severity of the stroke lesion, as well as improve cognitive outcomes.
RIC has been studied in animal models of perinatal asphyxia and has shown encouraging results. In neonatal rats with HIE, RIC is associated with reduced sensory motor deficits compared to non-RIC, and repeated cycles in three consecutive days is superior to a single treatment. In piglets, four cycles of 10 minutes of bilateral hindlimb ischemia immediately after bilateral common carotid occlusion results in reduced cell death in the periventricular white matter and internal capsule. These preclinical studies support the hypothesis that RIC may be beneficial in infants with HIE. In this proposal, we outline a carefully designed and conducted early phase study of RIC in neonates with HIE.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Arm - Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Patients randomized to the RIC arm, cohorts of 4 consecutive patients will receive escalating therapy:
A. 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 3 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Day 1 of therapeutic hypothermia B. Observing no safety events (see below) from patients in group A, 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Day 1 of therapeutic hypothermia.
C. Observing no safety events from patients in group B, 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Days 1 and 2 of therapeutic hypothermia.
D. Observing no safety events from patients in group C, 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Days 1, 2, and 3 of therapeutic hypothermia.
All infants will have an extra 1ml of blood collected.
Control Arm - No Remote Ischemic Conditioning
No intervention. A blood pressure cuff will be placed on the infant's arm but will not be inflated.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Patients randomized to the RIC arm, cohorts of 4 consecutive patients will receive escalating therapy:
A. 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 3 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Day 1 of therapeutic hypothermia B. Observing no safety events (see below) from patients in group A, 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Day 1 of therapeutic hypothermia.
C. Observing no safety events from patients in group B, 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Days 1 and 2 of therapeutic hypothermia.
D. Observing no safety events from patients in group C, 4 consecutive patients will undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes ischemia, followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, on Days 1, 2, and 3 of therapeutic hypothermia.
All infants will have an extra 1ml of blood collected.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Known central nervous system malformations
* Known chromosomal or genetic anomalies
* Confirmed or suspected inborn error of metabolism
* Parental decision for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment ("comfort care"). If this decision is made after enrollment but before completion of RIC intervention, no further study-related intervention will be performed.
* Patients requiring significant hemodynamic support (two or more agents for blood pressure support, \>0.05mcg/kg/min epinephrine infusion, or \>0.1 mU/kg/min vasopressin) for the four hour period prior to RIC
* Patients requiring inhaled nitric oxide or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) \>50% for the four-hour period prior to RIC
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian Kalish
Neonatologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian Kalish, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1000077295
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.