Effect of Vitamin D and Denosumab on Bone Remodelling in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

NCT ID: NCT05372224

Last Updated: 2023-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-22

Study Completion Date

2021-06-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANKL ligand, which is used as an alternative treatment for osteoporosis in patients who have a poor response to first-line antiresorptive therapy. However, discontinuation of denosumab produces a rapid increase in bone turnover, bone loss and potentially increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

76 postmenopausal women from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital "1o de Octubre" of the Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE) were firstly considered, of which 23 presented elimination criteria and only 55 who had received denosumab therapy for an average of 2.5 years without a significant improvement in hip and lumbar spine T-scores were enrolled. First, a general medical evaluation was performed. Serum levels of vitamin D were analysed to find the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D. A bone mineral density test was done to calculate hip and lumbar spine T-scores. Then, vitamin D was administrated daily for one year at a dose of 4,000 IU and the studies were repeated after one year. Statistical analysis was performed using PAST 3.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. software. The arithmetic median (µ) and standard deviation (S.D.) were calculated using Excel-Word. Graphics were constructed with GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 and tables with Excel Word. Categorical variables were analysed with chi-squared or Fisher exact test depending on the number of participants in each cell. Normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To compare two paired samples, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized. The assigned α value for this study was \<0.05. In all cases, if a Montecarlo permutation was available, the exact p-value was taken instead of the raw p-value.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypovitaminosis D Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal Menopause

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

76 participants were considered from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital "1o de Octubre" of the Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE), of which 23 presented elimination criteria, and 55 were included in the study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vitamin D 4000 IU

4000 IU of vitamin D were administrated once a day orally and calcium carbonate 1.2 g a day in a single dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cholecalciferol

Intervention Type DRUG

4000 IU were administrated once a day for 3 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cholecalciferol

4000 IU were administrated once a day for 3 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Histofil®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteopenia in treatment with denosumab 60mg every six months plus calcium carbonate 1.2g/day + vitamin D 800IU/day.
* Diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D, with serum cholecalciferol values \<30ng/dL.

Exclusion Criteria

* Incomplete clinical records or clinical records.
* Age over 90 years.
* Diagnosis of secondary (hereditary) osteoporosis.
* History of prolonged use of steroids.
* Lack of adherence to medical treatment.
* Diagnosis of cancer.
* Diagnosis of depression.
* Diagnosis of Celiac disease or with the presence of alterations in intestinal absorption.
* Allergies to any of the medications administered.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

María B Brito-Gavilanes, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1 ISSSTE

Patricia Loranca-Moreno, M.D., M.Sc.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE.

Juan M Ocampo-Godínez, M.D., P.hD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, UNAM

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Patricia Loranca-Moreno

Mexico City, Gustavo A. Madero, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tsourdi E, Langdahl B, Cohen-Solal M, Aubry-Rozier B, Eriksen EF, Guanabens N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Eastell R, Zillikens MC. Discontinuation of Denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: A systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone. 2017 Dec;105:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28789921 (View on PubMed)

McClung MR, Wagman RB, Miller PD, Wang A, Lewiecki EM. Observations following discontinuation of long-term denosumab therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1723-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3919-1. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28144701 (View on PubMed)

Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jan;30(1):3-44. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30324412 (View on PubMed)

Miyoshi A, Kameda H, Nagai S, Nakamura A, Miya A, Takase T, Atsumi T, Miyoshi H. Beneficial effects of switching to denosumab from bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and osteopenia/osteoporosis. J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Jul;12(7):1293-1300. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13458. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33141482 (View on PubMed)

Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, Maddox J, Fan M, Meisner PD, Grauer A. Romosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1417-1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28892457 (View on PubMed)

Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19671655 (View on PubMed)

Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Soen S, Yamanaka H, Yoneda T, Tanaka S, Nitta T, Okubo N, Genant HK, van der Heijde D. Effects of the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab on joint structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DESIRABLE study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jul;78(7):899-907. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214827. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31036625 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

032.2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anabolic Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
NCT05010590 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4