Comparison on Radiotherapy Permanent Skin Marking With Lancets and an Electric Marking Device
NCT ID: NCT05371795
Last Updated: 2022-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-18
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Markerless Image Guidance Using Intrafraction Kolovoltage X-ray Imaging for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
NCT04310891
Feasibility of Semi-Permanent Tattoo for Treatment Alignment in Radiation Therapy
NCT05248009
Biomarkers for Prediction of Tumor Response to Radiotherapy
NCT03744819
Study Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Spinal Metastases
NCT02512965
Receiving Radiation Therapy in the MRgRT Research Facility
NCT02701712
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lancets
Lancets
The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired. For the control group, patients' markings are tattooed using a 28-gauge disposable lancet and india ink. After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated. Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol. No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified.
Comfort Marker 2.0
Comfort Marker 2.0
The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired. For the experimental group, patients' markings are tattooed using an electric marking device developed for set-up marking, the Comfort Marker 2.0® (CM), designed by CIVCO medical solutions, using the 0.2mm deep application depth and the brand-included black pigment. After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated. Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol. No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Comfort Marker 2.0
The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired. For the experimental group, patients' markings are tattooed using an electric marking device developed for set-up marking, the Comfort Marker 2.0® (CM), designed by CIVCO medical solutions, using the 0.2mm deep application depth and the brand-included black pigment. After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated. Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol. No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified.
Lancets
The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired. For the control group, patients' markings are tattooed using a 28-gauge disposable lancet and india ink. After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated. Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol. No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients referred to our department to receive external beam radiation therapy.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1.
* Estimated fractionating schedule of at least 13 once-daily fractions.
* Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia, Francisco Gentil, Porto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
André Miranda Pires
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Genti
Porto, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pires AM, Carvalho L, Santos AC, Vilaca AM, Coelho AR, Oliveira C, Costa C, Fernandes F, Moreira L, Lima J, Vieira R, Ferraz MJ, Silva M, Silva P, Matias R, Zorro S, Costa S, Sarandao S, Barros AF. Radiation Therapy Skin Marking with Lancets Versus Electric Marking Pen (COMFORTATTOO)-6 Months Results on Cosmesis, Fading, and Patients' Satisfaction From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 5;9(3):101404. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101404. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CONFORTATTOO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.