Efficacy and Safety in Imlifidase Desensitized Kidney Tx Patients, Including Two Non-Comparative Reference Cohorts
NCT ID: NCT05369975
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE3
225 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-19
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Renal Function in Highly Sensitized Patients 1 Year After Desensitization With Imlifidase Prior to DD Kidney Tx
NCT04935177
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Imlifidase in Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Patients
NCT03897205
A Long-term Follow-up Trial of Patients Previously Treated With Imlifidase Prior to Kidney Transplantation and a Non-comparative Transplanted Patient Group
NCT05937750
A Follow up Study of Patients Treated With Imlifidase Prior to Kidney Transplantation
NCT03611621
An Long-term Follow-up Trial of Kidney Tx Patients Treated With Imlifidase or PE After an AMR
NCT04711850
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The efficacy of imlifidase per se, i.e. rapidly cleavage of IgG to enable transplantation, is not reflected by the important clinical outcomes 1-year graft failure-free survival and kidney function. These are instead a measure of effectiveness and safety in the real-world transplantation setting. It should be noted that patient outcome is highly dependent on the post-transplantation management, as well as compliance to maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.
All patients with donor specific antibodies (DSAs) are at risk for antibody-mediated reactions (AMRs). Imlifidase removes DSA quickly and efficiently at the time of transplantation but, as with other desensitization methods, the antibodies are expected to re-occur after transplantation. The highly sensitized patients included in this trial must therefore be closely monitored for any signs of AMR. Protocol kidney biopsies will be performed at 6 months and 1 year after transplantation. For-cause biopsies, DSA and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) will be collected to assess AMR frequency.
A non-comparative concurrent reference cohort consisting of kidney transplanted patients from participating trial sites with any grade of sensitization and a negative XM towards their donor will be included in the trial to address differences in-site practice, experience, and amount of immunosuppressive therapies given that may have an impact on the overall results for the imlifidase-treated cohort. Once a highly sensitized imlifidase treated patient has been transplanted at a site, subsequent patients who are offered a compatible kidney will be offered the opportunity to be included in the trial as part of the reference cohort group and transplanted. The goal is to have at least 1 or 2 patients from each site participating in the non-comparative concurrent reference cohort. Given that the patients in this cohort will be qualitatively different from the imlifidase treated patients, formal statistical comparisons will not be appropriate. Patients included in the non-comparative concurrent reference cohort will be followed for 12 months after transplantation and treated in accordance with each clinic's normal transplantation routines.
A second, non-comparative historical reference cohort of 100 kidney transplanted patients will be randomly selected from the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) registry in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria provided in the protocol prior to commencement of the active trial. No clinical activities will be done to this historical reference cohort. The patients of this cohort will be less sensitized compared to the imlifidase-treated cohort, have a negative XM towards their donor and have been transplanted during 2010 or later. Since patients in this cohort are expected to have both a better prognosis and a higher graft survival rate at 1 year than the imlifidase-treated patients, formal statistical comparison between the groups would be inappropriate. The year 2010 was chosen as cut-off for inclusion in the non-comparative historical reference cohort to make it likely that the patients in this group have received the same maintenance immunosuppression as is given today to most kidney transplant recipients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The rational for a non-randomised trial is that no other effective or approved desensitization protocol exists in deceased-donor kidney transplantation that would provide a suitable control.
A non-comparative concurrent reference cohort from participating sites will be included to address differences in-site practice and experience.
A non-comparative historical reference cohort from the CTS registry will be included to address the outcome in a less sensitized patient group.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Imlifidase
Imlifidase, is provided as a freeze-dried powder for concentrate for solution for infusion, 11 mg per vial. After reconstitution with sterile water for injection, the concentrate contains 10 mg/mL imlifidase. Imlifidase is administered intravenously as one infusion of 0.25 mg/kg over 15 minutes within 24 hours prior to transplantation. A second dose of 0.25 mg/kg may be given if the first imlifidase dose is considered not to have had sufficient effect. The second dose can be administered within 24 hours after the first dose.
Imlifidase
Imlifidase is an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-degrading enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes that is highly selective towards IgG. The cleavage of IgG generates one F(ab')2- and one homodimeric Fc-fragment and efficiently neutralizes Fc-mediated activities of IgG.
Non-Comparative Concurrent Reference Cohort
Patients in the non-comparative prospective concurrent reference cohort (with any grade of sensitization and negative XM) will receive medications, both pre- and post-transplant, in accordance with each clinic's routine for kidney transplanted patients.
Normal Transplantation Routine
Transplantation and pre- and post-transplantation therapies in accordance with the clinic's normal transplantation routine.
Non-Comparative Historical Reference Cohort
Patients in the non-comparative historical reference cohort (with less sensitization and negative XM) randomly selected from the CTS registry have been transplanted and treated in accordance with standard-of-care for kidney transplanted patients. Patients transplanted in 2010 and onwards will be selected to optimize the probability that these patients will have received about the same maintenance immunosuppressive treatment as the patients in the current trial will receive.
Normal Transplantation Routine
Transplantation and pre- and post-transplantation therapies in accordance with the clinic's normal transplantation routine.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Imlifidase
Imlifidase is an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-degrading enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes that is highly selective towards IgG. The cleavage of IgG generates one F(ab')2- and one homodimeric Fc-fragment and efficiently neutralizes Fc-mediated activities of IgG.
Normal Transplantation Routine
Transplantation and pre- and post-transplantation therapies in accordance with the clinic's normal transplantation routine.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ABO-compatible deceased donor aged 10-70 years
1. ESRD active on the renal transplant waiting list of a kidney allocation system at the time of screening
2. High sensitization with the highest unmet medical need unlikely to be transplanted under the available kidney allocation system including prioritisation programmes for highly sensitized patients
3. Known DSA against an available deceased donor
4. Positive crossmatch test determined by complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and/or flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) against an available deceased donor. If physical XM tests are not practically possible due to lack of time, patients may be included on a virtual crossmatch (vXM) predictive of a positive XM test.
5. Signed Informed Consent obtained before any trial-related procedures
6. Willingness and ability to comply with the protocol
1. Active on the renal transplant waiting list at a participating trial site at the time of screening
2. An acceptable kidney transplant from a deceased donor
3. Signed Informed Consent obtained before any trial related procedures
4. Willingness and ability to comply with the protocol
1. ESRD with a kidney transplant from a deceased donor
2. Being transplanted in Europe after 01-Jan-2010 and included in the CTS registry
3. Panel reactive antibodies (PRA) ≥ 50% (CDC T- or B-cell PRA, calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA), or virtual panel reactive antibodies (vPRA))
4. Maintenance immunosuppression (intention to treat) with calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids in combination
Exclusion Criteria
2. Malignancy within 5 years prior to transplantation
3. Positive serology for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
4. Clinically relevant active infection(s) as judged by the investigator
5. Contemporaneous participation in medical device studies
6. Known mental incapacity or language barriers precluding adequate understanding of the Informed Consent information and the trial activities
7. Inability by the judgement of the investigator to participate in the trial for any other reason
1. Previous treatment with imlifidase
2. Previous high dose IVIg treatment (2 g/kg) within 28 days prior to imlifidase treatment
3. Positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test
4. Breast feeding or pregnancy
5. Hypersensitivity to the active substance (imlifidase) or to any of the excipients
6. Ongoing serious infections
7. Present, or history of, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), or known familial history of TTP
8. Severe other condition requiring treatment and close monitoring e.g. cardiac failure ≥ grade 4 (New York Heart Association), unstable coronary disease or oxygen dependent respiratory disease
9. Female of childbearing potential, not willing to use effective contraception during the 3 weeks following treatment with imlifidase. In the context of this trial, an effective method is defined as those which result in low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly such as:
1. combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation; (i) oral, (ii) intravaginal, or (iii) transdermal
2. progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation; (i) oral, (ii) injectable, or (iii) implantable
3. intrauterine device (IUD)
4. intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
5. bilateral tubal occlusion
6. vasectomised partner
7. true abstinence: When this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. \[Periodic abstinence (such as calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception\]
10. Any other reason that, in the view of the investigator, precludes transplantation
1. Patients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors
2. Patients treated with belatacept
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hansa Biopharma AB
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clinical Operations
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hansa Biopharma AB
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medizinische Universitaet Wien
Vienna, , Austria
UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg
Leuven, , Belgium
Institut klinicke a experimentalni mediciny (IKEM)
Prague, , Czechia
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Rouen - Hôpital de Bois-Guillaume
Bois-Guillaume, , France
CHU de Grenoble - Hôpital Michallon
La Tronche, , France
Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades
Paris, , France
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technische Universitaet Muenchen
Munich, , Germany
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padua, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Parma
Parma, , Italy
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, , Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, , Netherlands
Erasmus University Medical Center
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Department of Nephrology , Zaloška 7
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
Hospital Del Mar, Servicio de Nefrología
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Unidad de Trasplante Renal
Barcelona, , Spain
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH)
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Karolinska University Hospital
Huddinge, , Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, , Sweden
St. James University Hospital
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Leicester General Hospital
Leicester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. New Therapies for Highly Sensitized Patients on the Waiting List. Kidney360. 2024 Aug 1;5(8):1207-1225. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000509. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-002640-70
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20-HMedIdeS-19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.