Superior Capsular Reconstruction With InternalBrace Study
NCT ID: NCT05360654
Last Updated: 2025-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
29 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-22
2025-03-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Superior Capsule vs Bridging Study
NCT04965103
Subscapularis Tears in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tear
NCT03352180
Surgical Management of Irreparable RC Tears
NCT03878862
SupraScapular Cuff Study: Assessing the Effects of Size and Type of Rotator Cuff Tear on Suprascapular Nerve Function
NCT06002009
RECURRENCE OF ROTATOR CUFF LESION AFTER SURGICAL REPAIR WITH SINGLE-ROW vs DOUBLE-ROW SUTURE BRIDGE TECNIQUE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
NCT06059625
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
SCR is a more recently introduced technique presenting a viable alternative in this group of participants. This was first described by Hanada et al. and subsequently popularised by Mihata et al. This technique utilises either an autograft such as fascia lata, or dermal allograft to restore the superior capsule and prevent proximal migration of the humeral head. A biomechanical study has shown that SCR restores stability in the superior direction, thereby preventing abrasion and graft failure through subacromial impingement. In a recently published multiple retrospective case series, this technique showed improved functional outcomes whilst reducing pain. A recent retrospective case series of SCR at Wrightington Hospital confirmed the safety profile of this operation. 77% of participants were noted to be pain free post-operatively and were able to return to 'normal activities'. However, there are significant methodological limitations related to such retrospective studies. These studies are either the original work of the proposer of surgery, or retrospective series. Such studies remain limited in terms of wider applicability. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), UK, has issued guidance highlighting the limitation of quality and quantity of available evidence related to this procedure. The guidance recommends the use of SCR in context of research alone. Recent studies have raised concerns related to incidence of graft failure following SCR. It is unclear what predisposes a certain patient group to graft failure. It has been suggested that addition of an InternalBrace as an additional step during SCR surgery may improve graft healing and reduce graft re-rupture rates. This is known as superior capsular reconstruction with InternalBrace (SCRIB). The investigators propose to perform a prospective study involving clinical (standardised outcome scores) and radiological (MRI scans) outcomes following SCRIB. The Investigators propose to compare graft healing rates following SCRIB versus historical controls where SCR was performed without InternalBrace.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Massive Rotator cuff tears (Patte stage 3), as visualised on the MRI Scan
* Failure of non-surgical treatment.
* Patients consenting for allograft usage
* Arthroscopic assessment identifying an irreparable tear. A rotator cuff tear is deemed irreparable if it is not possible to achieve complete cover-age of the humeral head following arthroscopic release.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with neurological cause of weakness
* Patients with advanced arthritis affecting the joint (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 to 4)
* Fixed Humeral head superior displacement (Hamada Grade 3 to 4)
Intra-operative
\- Advanced cartilage loss
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Edge Hill University
OTHER
University of Central Lancashire
OTHER
Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Puneet Monga
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Wigan, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SCRIB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.