Effects of AlignBabyCleft (ABaCleft)

NCT ID: NCT05357092

Last Updated: 2025-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-21

Study Completion Date

2028-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Since the appearance of presurgical infant orthopedic (PSIO) as a treatment for patients with cleft lip and palate ( CLP) , numerous techniques have been described with the aim of aligning the displaced alveolar segments and restoring the position of the lateral cartilage, thus improving the results of primary surgery. Currently, the most used technique in the different protocols is the nasoalveolar molding (NAM) described by Grayson, from which variants and modifications have emerged in order to improve its results and provide greater comfort for both the patient and their caregivers.

However, the main drawback of traditional acrylic NAM is the need for sequential addition of acrylic to reduce the size of the indentation. These weekly adjustments consume time and resources for the caregiver and the orthodontist. Likewise, it has been observed that acrylic resin can cause inflammation, irritation and gingival ulceration due to excessive pressure.

PSIO treatment in newborns is a complex procedure that could benefit from simplification through digitization, providing accuracy and precision, avoiding risks such as respiratory obstruction and cyanosis that can be produced by taking impressions with alginates or silicones, most of them needing to be performed under general anesthesia.

Until now, infant care has been left out of such digitization, despite the fact that the majority of babies who need early orthodontic treatment often suffer from craniofacial disorders. However, in recent years numerous advances have been made in this type of treatment, both in taking records, and in the application of more physiological, lighter and constant forces, providing greater comfort, better acceptance and less pain for the patient . These changes represent a great advance applicable to patients with CLP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The AlingBabyCleft (AbaCleft) trial will be designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial, with an investigator blinded, superiority trial with two parallel arms.

Active treatment will be planned as soon as possible after the patient's birth, once the patient has been diagnosed with CLP and once the caregivers have been duly informed about the clinical trial, as well as its advantages and disadvantages.

The main objective (MO) of this study is to analyze the changes that occur in the dental arches of a newborn patient, diagnosed with CLP, with PSIO performed with transparent aligners, a technique that is very different from that performed in this type of surgery in patients to date.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cleft Lip Cleft Palate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Patients treated with clear aligners to bring cleft segments closer previous to primary lip surgery.

An average of 15 aligners will be needed although it depends on the cleft.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Appliance. Orthodontic appliance to carry out dentoalveolar movement

Intervention Type DEVICE

A digital 3D model obtained with a 3D scanner: (T1,baseline), (T2, aprox 8 weeks), and at the end of othopedic treatment previous to primary lip surgery (T3, aprox 16 weeks).

Once a week, clinical check.

Gold Standard

The reference therapeutic action (no pre-surgical orthopedic intervention previous to primary lip surgery)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Appliance. Orthodontic appliance to carry out dentoalveolar movement

A digital 3D model obtained with a 3D scanner: (T1,baseline), (T2, aprox 8 weeks), and at the end of othopedic treatment previous to primary lip surgery (T3, aprox 16 weeks).

Once a week, clinical check.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Clear Aligners

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients selected for the clinical trial must meet these criteria after randomization:

* All patients born at term, without any syndrome associated with CLP, aged between 7 days and one month of life, referred from the different hospitals of the Spanish Health System, will be included in the study.
* No distinction will be made on the basis of race or ethnic group to which the participants belong.
* Any patient will be discriminated due to distance from their place of residence.
* Participants must agree to attend regular check-ups.
* All patients who agree to be part of the experimental study must previously sign the specific informed consent designed for this purpose.

Exclusion Criteria

* Caregivers who are not fluent in the Spanish language will be excluded in order to understand and assimilate all the instructions provided for treatment compliance.
* Patients who do not comply with the regimen of visits to the orthodontic department, and for whom a correct control of the evolution of the treatment cannot be guaranteed, will be excluded from the study.
* Lack of collaboration or non-compliance with the use of the clear aligners will also be considered grounds for exclusion.
* Patients with soft tissue bands should also be excluded from our study.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

1 Month

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ROSA YAÑEZ VICO

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

COMPLUTENSE UNIVERITY OF MADRID

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ROSA YAÑEZ VICO

Role: CONTACT

913941982 ext. 913941982

ANA RABAL SOLANS

Role: CONTACT

915756135 ext. 915756135

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Allareddy V, Shusterman S, Ross E, Palermo V, Ricalde P. Dentofacial Orthopedics for the Cleft Patient: The Latham Approach. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 May;32(2):187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32081579 (View on PubMed)

Ball JV, DiBiase DD, Sommerlad BC. Transverse maxillary arch changes with the use of preoperative orthopedics in unilateral cleft palate infants. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995 Nov;32(6):483-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0483_tmacwt_2.3.co_2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8547288 (View on PubMed)

Berkowitz S, Mejia M, Bystrik A. A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):1-18. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000096710.08123.93.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14707617 (View on PubMed)

Fuchigami T, Kimura N, Kibe T, Tezuka M, Amir MS, Suga H, Takemoto Y, Hashiguchi M, Maeda-Iino A, Nakamura N. Effects of pre-surgical nasoalveolar moulding on maxillary arch and nasal form in unilateral cleft lip and palate before lip surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Nov;20(4):209-215. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12199. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28921849 (View on PubMed)

Adali N, Mars M, Petrie A, Noar J, Sommerlad B. Presurgical orthopedics has no effect on archform in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Jan;49(1):5-13. doi: 10.1597/11-030. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21823827 (View on PubMed)

Mars M, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):405-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0405_asciso_2.3.co_2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1472517 (View on PubMed)

Prahl C, Prahl-Andersen B, Van't Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Presurgical orthopedics and satisfaction in motherhood: a randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 May;45(3):284-8. doi: 10.1597/07-045.1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18452361 (View on PubMed)

Al Khateeb KA, Fotouh MA, Abdelsayed F, Fahim F. Short-Term Efficacy of Presurgical Vacuum Formed Nasoalveolar Molding Aligners on Nose, Lip, and Maxillary Arch Morphology in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Jul;58(7):815-823. doi: 10.1177/1055665620966189. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33107321 (View on PubMed)

Gong X, Dang R, Xu T, Yu Q, Zheng J. Full Digital Workflow of Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):367-371. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006258.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32049908 (View on PubMed)

Batra P, Gribel BF, Abhinav BA, Arora A, Raghavan S. OrthoAligner "NAM": A Case Series of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics (PSIO) Using Clear Aligners. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 May;57(5):646-655. doi: 10.1177/1055665619889807. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31795731 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

The 360º Cleft Project -ABa

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.