Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-21
2028-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, the main drawback of traditional acrylic NAM is the need for sequential addition of acrylic to reduce the size of the indentation. These weekly adjustments consume time and resources for the caregiver and the orthodontist. Likewise, it has been observed that acrylic resin can cause inflammation, irritation and gingival ulceration due to excessive pressure.
PSIO treatment in newborns is a complex procedure that could benefit from simplification through digitization, providing accuracy and precision, avoiding risks such as respiratory obstruction and cyanosis that can be produced by taking impressions with alginates or silicones, most of them needing to be performed under general anesthesia.
Until now, infant care has been left out of such digitization, despite the fact that the majority of babies who need early orthodontic treatment often suffer from craniofacial disorders. However, in recent years numerous advances have been made in this type of treatment, both in taking records, and in the application of more physiological, lighter and constant forces, providing greater comfort, better acceptance and less pain for the patient . These changes represent a great advance applicable to patients with CLP.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of a Newly Designed Presurgical Orthopedic Appliance
NCT05535530
Two Methods of Lip Taping as a Presurgical Orthopedic Appliance
NCT05796336
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
NCT04354116
The Effectiveness of Adhesive Versus Conventional Nasoalveolar Molding on Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
NCT06451276
Effectiveness of a Customized 3D Printed Nostril Retainer Combined With Taping Vs.Taping Only on Enhancing the Nasolabial Esthetics and Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Infants With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.
NCT06211205
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Active treatment will be planned as soon as possible after the patient's birth, once the patient has been diagnosed with CLP and once the caregivers have been duly informed about the clinical trial, as well as its advantages and disadvantages.
The main objective (MO) of this study is to analyze the changes that occur in the dental arches of a newborn patient, diagnosed with CLP, with PSIO performed with transparent aligners, a technique that is very different from that performed in this type of surgery in patients to date.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Patients treated with clear aligners to bring cleft segments closer previous to primary lip surgery.
An average of 15 aligners will be needed although it depends on the cleft.
Appliance. Orthodontic appliance to carry out dentoalveolar movement
A digital 3D model obtained with a 3D scanner: (T1,baseline), (T2, aprox 8 weeks), and at the end of othopedic treatment previous to primary lip surgery (T3, aprox 16 weeks).
Once a week, clinical check.
Gold Standard
The reference therapeutic action (no pre-surgical orthopedic intervention previous to primary lip surgery)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Appliance. Orthodontic appliance to carry out dentoalveolar movement
A digital 3D model obtained with a 3D scanner: (T1,baseline), (T2, aprox 8 weeks), and at the end of othopedic treatment previous to primary lip surgery (T3, aprox 16 weeks).
Once a week, clinical check.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients born at term, without any syndrome associated with CLP, aged between 7 days and one month of life, referred from the different hospitals of the Spanish Health System, will be included in the study.
* No distinction will be made on the basis of race or ethnic group to which the participants belong.
* Any patient will be discriminated due to distance from their place of residence.
* Participants must agree to attend regular check-ups.
* All patients who agree to be part of the experimental study must previously sign the specific informed consent designed for this purpose.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who do not comply with the regimen of visits to the orthodontic department, and for whom a correct control of the evolution of the treatment cannot be guaranteed, will be excluded from the study.
* Lack of collaboration or non-compliance with the use of the clear aligners will also be considered grounds for exclusion.
* Patients with soft tissue bands should also be excluded from our study.
7 Days
1 Month
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ROSA YAÑEZ VICO
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
COMPLUTENSE UNIVERITY OF MADRID
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allareddy V, Shusterman S, Ross E, Palermo V, Ricalde P. Dentofacial Orthopedics for the Cleft Patient: The Latham Approach. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 May;32(2):187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Ball JV, DiBiase DD, Sommerlad BC. Transverse maxillary arch changes with the use of preoperative orthopedics in unilateral cleft palate infants. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995 Nov;32(6):483-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0483_tmacwt_2.3.co_2.
Berkowitz S, Mejia M, Bystrik A. A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):1-18. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000096710.08123.93.
Fuchigami T, Kimura N, Kibe T, Tezuka M, Amir MS, Suga H, Takemoto Y, Hashiguchi M, Maeda-Iino A, Nakamura N. Effects of pre-surgical nasoalveolar moulding on maxillary arch and nasal form in unilateral cleft lip and palate before lip surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Nov;20(4):209-215. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12199. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Adali N, Mars M, Petrie A, Noar J, Sommerlad B. Presurgical orthopedics has no effect on archform in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Jan;49(1):5-13. doi: 10.1597/11-030. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
Mars M, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):405-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0405_asciso_2.3.co_2.
Prahl C, Prahl-Andersen B, Van't Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Presurgical orthopedics and satisfaction in motherhood: a randomized clinical trial (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 May;45(3):284-8. doi: 10.1597/07-045.1.
Al Khateeb KA, Fotouh MA, Abdelsayed F, Fahim F. Short-Term Efficacy of Presurgical Vacuum Formed Nasoalveolar Molding Aligners on Nose, Lip, and Maxillary Arch Morphology in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Jul;58(7):815-823. doi: 10.1177/1055665620966189. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
Gong X, Dang R, Xu T, Yu Q, Zheng J. Full Digital Workflow of Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):367-371. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006258.
Batra P, Gribel BF, Abhinav BA, Arora A, Raghavan S. OrthoAligner "NAM": A Case Series of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics (PSIO) Using Clear Aligners. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 May;57(5):646-655. doi: 10.1177/1055665619889807. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
The 360º Cleft Project -ABa
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.