Effect of Segmental Muscle Vibration on Upper Limb Function in Post Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT05356481

Last Updated: 2023-09-18

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 57 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2023-01-15
• Study Completion Date: 2023-07-30

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Detailed Description

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and is often associated with persistent involvement of upper limbs.Several disturbances are the manifestation of UL impairments after stroke (i.e., muscle weakness, changes in muscle tone, joint disturbances, impaired motor control) . Muscular weakness and spasticity are most commonly observed in post stroke patients. There are many strategies are developed to improve functional status and to reduce spasticity pattern in post stroke patients. Among the different approaches to improve motor functions in post stroke patients, vibration therapy gives strong stimulatory effects in post paretic limb. Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) is a fairly new technique that has been used to improve motor function and inhibit spasticity in the hemiplegic upper extremity of patients following a stroke. In SMV, a vibratory stimulus is applied to a specific muscle tendon using a mechanical device unit.The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Conditions

Stroke

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Experimental Group A

will recieve (low frequency segmental muscle vibration of 41 Hz over flexors muscles of upper limb Pectoralis minor, Biceps brachii, Flexor carpi muscle + general physical therapy session ) The transducer applied perpendicular to the muscle near its distal tendon insertion.The application consisted of 3 vibration sessions each with duration of 5 minutes for each muscle with 1 minute interval separated these sessions during the interval muscle vibration will interrupted and the subject will request to relax the muscle

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

segmental muscle vibration

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Segmental muscle vibration will delivered over the target muscles by means of vibrator with general physical therapy session

Experimental Group B

group receive (low frequency segmental muscle vibration of 41 Hz over extensors muscles of upper limb Triceps brachii, Extensor carpi radialis longus \& brevis + general physical therapy session ) The transducer applied perpendicular to the muscle near its distal tendon insertion The application consisted of 3 vibration sessions each with duration of 5 minutes for each muscle with 1 minute interval separated these sessions during the interval muscle vibration will interrupted and the subject will request to relax the muscle

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

segmental muscle vibration

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Segmental muscle vibration will delivered over the target muscles by means of vibrator with general physical therapy session

Interventions

segmental muscle vibration

Segmental muscle vibration will delivered over the target muscles by means of vibrator with general physical therapy session

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

general physical therapy session

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Both genders
• Age: between 50-65 years.
• Spasticity 1-3 on MAS
• 3-6 months post stroke patients

Exclusion Criteria

• Cardiovascular event (myocardial ischemia or infarction) occurring within 12 months,
• Use of any antispastic drug
• Pain from vibration
• Inflammatory osteoarticular diseases

• Minimum Eligible Age: 50 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Aruba Saeed, PhD*

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Riphah international university.pakistan

Locations

Muhammad shahid shabbir

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Riphah International University

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Countries

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

REC/01390 Shahid Shabbir

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id