Stigma and a Shared Decision Aid

NCT ID: NCT05352412

Last Updated: 2025-06-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-07

Study Completion Date

2024-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A major barrier for the uptake of evidence-based interventions to address the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, especially in rural regions, is stigma, which occurs at many levels, including that of the patient and provider. A shared decision making aid is an evidence-based method for increasing engagement and knowledge of both patients and providers, potentially democratizing treatment decisions, especially in stigmatized conditions. The investigators propose to adapt and pilot a decision aid for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and harm reduction in two hospitals in rural Missouri to evaluate whether this reduces stigma in both patients and providers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the past decade, the US opioid crisis has emerged as a leading cause of death among adults. It has also led to an increase in invasive bacterial and fungal infections; and HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) outbreaks in multiple regions. Rural communities have had an especially disproportionate burden from the impact of opioid use disorder (OUD). Treatment of OUD with pharmacotherapy is one of the most effective strategies for reducing OUD-related mortality and morbidity. But while there has been increasing will for expanding pharmacotherapy, stigma - from community, providers and patients-remains a significant barrier to uptake pharmacotherapy and harm reduction. The approach to substance use has historically favored abstinence strategies that are often without evidence, influenced by punitive, stigmatizing framework. This stigma may be even more prevalent in rural communities. To date there have been very few effective interventions to address inter- and intrapersonal stigma, and none with sustained effectiveness. The investigators propose adapting and piloting a shared decision-making aid for patients presenting to the emergency department or are being admitted at two hospitals in rural Missouri, where there is a high prevalence of OUD and its complications. The decision-aid is an evidence-based intervention show to increase knowledge, engagement and decision-making concordant with patient values in a variety of medical conditions. It is feasible that by democratizing treatment and standardizing decision-making counseling, the decision aid can mediate attitudes and reduce stigma. The investigators hypothesize by delivering standardized, high-quality knowledge to both provider and patient, that stigma can be reduced in both parties. In Aim 1 the investigators will adapt an existing decision aid for OUD treatment to the specific context of rural hospital care. This decision aid will be a part of an existing bundled care program for OUD and related infections that the investigators have implemented in these hospitals. In Aim 2 the investigators will conduct a randomized pilot comparing the decision aid intervention with counseling as usual without decision aid to assess feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness for reducing stigma in substance use, HIV, OUD pharmacotherapy and harm reduction. The investigators will measure these around the time of the intervention and in longitudinal follow up. The findings could potentially identify a novel intervention and methodology for treatment expansion and stigma reduction that has not been previously explored, especially in the rural context, where need is high. Following the successful completion of this pilot trial, the investigators will develop an expanded multi-site comparative effectiveness trial of the decision aid, implementation studies, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid Use Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Baseline Counseling As Usual - Patient

Patients randomized to the baseline counseling from their healthcare provider regarding medications for opioid use disorder.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Shared Decision Making Aid - Patient

Patients randomized to the decision aid arm will receive all of the above as well as a shared decision making aid. This will be a 10-minute survey that takes into account their priorities and preferences around medications for opioid use disorder.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shared Decision Making Aid - Patients

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients will be randomized to the shared decision making aid intervention.

Baseline Counseling As Usual - Provider

Providers of patients randomized to the baseline counseling as usual arm will will be asked to participate in a survey to assess their stigma in regards to taking care of patients with opioid use disorder.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Shared Decision Making Aid - Provider

Providers of patients randomized to the decision aid arm will will be asked to participate in a survey to assess their stigma in regards to taking care of patients with opioid use disorder.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shared Decision Making Aid - Providers

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Providers of patients randomized o the shared decision making aid intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shared Decision Making Aid - Patients

Patients will be randomized to the shared decision making aid intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Shared Decision Making Aid - Providers

Providers of patients randomized o the shared decision making aid intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients from a rural community currently admitted or recently admitted to Barnes-Jewish Hospital
* Admission must be for an infection associated with intravenous drug use
* Patient must be willing to speak with healthcare provider about medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs)
* patient must be over 18 years old
* must be able to complete electronic survey written in English

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael J. Durkin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Patient Letter of Consent

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Provider Letter of Consent

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202107155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Coaching for HCV and HIV
NCT04314414 COMPLETED NA