Effectiveness of Online Therapy to Prevent Burnout

NCT ID: NCT05343208

Last Updated: 2022-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1916-09-05

Study Completion Date

2022-04-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to address the reliability and validity of the Empowerment for Participation (EFP) batch of assessments to measure Burnout risk in relation to the efficacy of online interventions to provide proactive rehabilitation using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and floating to achieve improved mental health and wellbeing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An Empirical design using raw EFP psychometric data to measure the effectiveness of online therapy to reduce the risk for Burnout between a control group and an online therapy group. The aim is to test whether or not there is a statistically significant difference in the effectiveness on online therapy to reduce the Risk for Burnout compared to that of a Control Group. Fifty participants were randomly selected. The rehabilitation and control Group consisted of twenty-five normally distributed employees (N25) each. The rehabilitation group received therapy, and the control had not yet received any form of therapy. SPSS was used to analyze the data collected, a Repeated Measure ANOVA, an ANCOVA, a Discriminant analysis, and a Construct Validity analysis were used to test for Reliability and Validity.

The group was randomly selected from a list of employees within the My-E-Health ecosystem. The group (N50) normally distributed group met all assumptions and consisted of a Control Group (N25) and a Therapy Group (N25). The post assessment value was used as the dependent variable.

The Burnout measure (30 questions) is obtained from the Empowerment for Participation (EFP) batch of assessments (110 questions). All assessments and CBT were done digitally online and floating was done at a designated location. The full EFP assessment is integrated into a digital ecosystem designed for this purpose and therapy. The online digital system is an integrity-based platform offering both the employee and caregiver a secure and encrypted ecosystem or secure data tunnel or channel between the therapists and patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Burnout Risk Reduction Cognitive Change

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

An empirical and parallel design using raw EFP psychometric data to measure the effectiveness of online therapy to reduce the risk for Burnout between a control group and an online therapy group.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Randomly selected from an employer list

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group

The group received online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via the My-E-Health. Patients were issued a preTest psychometric assessment and a post therapy assessment using the Burnout Psychometrics provided within the My-E-Health's online ecosystem. All patients were required to validate the accuracy of the assessments during a follow-up of their results.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EFP Psychometric assessment to determine level of afflication

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients were asked to complete a psychometric assessment in relation to their psychological wellbeing. Results were presented to the patient and validdated by the patient.

Control Group

The Control Group received no online therapy. Patients were issued a preTest psychometric assessment and a post therapy assessment using the Burnout Psychometrics provided within the My-E-Health's online ecosystem. All patients were required to validate the accuracy of the assessments during a follow-up of their results.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EFP Psychometric assessment to determine level of afflication

Patients were asked to complete a psychometric assessment in relation to their psychological wellbeing. Results were presented to the patient and validdated by the patient.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Employees assessed on the EFP Burnout Scale as having:

* a Moderate Risk of Burnout
* a High Risk of Burnout
* A Burned out Risk (Mental Health Exhaustion)
* Employees with a current Bunrout diagnosis from a hospital, outpatient or psychiatric cllinic
* A fully employed person with a member organization

Exclusion Criteria

Employees assessed on the EFP Burnout Scale as having:

* No evidence of Burnout
* Low Risk of Burnout.
* Unemployed persons
* No other exclusion critera was used.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

68 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karlstad University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

My-E-Health

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

SciensCollege

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clive S Michelsen, M.Sc.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

SciensCollege

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SciensCollege

Malmo, Skåne County, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Michelsen C, Kjellgren A. The Effectiveness of Web-Based Psychotherapy to Treat and Prevent Burnout: Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 11;6(8):e39129. doi: 10.2196/39129.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35802001 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SC-EOTPB-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.