A Sequential Allocation Study to Determine the ED50 of Dexmetedomidine as an Adjuvant to Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT05342870
Last Updated: 2022-04-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We will determine the population average dose of DEX (ED50) that provides 50 minutes of tolerance to the tourniquet during a Lidocaine IVRA by a sequential Dixon up-down allocation study.
Eligible patients will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Patients will receive a standardized IVRA with Lidocaine and DEX adjuvant following a sequential allocation scheme. The first patient will receive a dose of 0.5 µg/kg of DEX. The dose will be then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients dependent on the success of the previous patients block. If a patient experiences tourniquet pain prior to 50 minutes after inflation of the distal tourniquet the next patient will receive a higher dose, if he does not experience pain prior to 50 minutes after inflation of the distal tourniquet the dose for the following patient will be decreased.
Recruitment will continue until 6 independent crossovers are observed with a minimum of 20 patients. The mean and the standard deviation of the ED50 of DEX will be calculated using the modified up-down method.
This study will help determine the ED50 of DEX used as an adjuvant in IVRA. Based on the potency ratios of Clonidine vs. DEX, the investigators hypothesize that the dose of DEX needed to achieve 50 minutes of pain free tourniquet time will be closer to 0.125 µg/kg rather than 0.5 µg/kg, a 75% reduction in the dose studied.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Median Effective Dose of Dexmedetomidine in Elective Upper Limb Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
NCT04304157
Analgesic Efficacy of Two Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Lidocaine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
NCT03399474
Dexmedetomidine in IVRA
NCT05123170
Perineural Dexmedetomidine for Ulnar Nerve Block.
NCT03222323
Addition of Dexmedetomidine to Ropivacaine-induced Supraclavicular Block (ADRIB Trial)
NCT02630290
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine
Following a sequential allocation scheme, the dexmedetomidine dose for each patient was determined by the Dixon up-and-down method. The dexmedetomidine dose for the first patient was 0.5 µg/kg. The dose was then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients depending on the success of the previous patient's block. If a patient experienced tourniquet pain prior to T0 + 50 minutes the next patient received a higher dose. If a patient did not experience pain at T0 + 50 minutes of tourniquet time the dose for the following patient was decreased. Identical syringes containing the solution mix were prepared by the principal investigator and handed to the blinded anesthesiologist in the room. Stopping rules were set at 6 independent crossovers in the same direction (no pain to pain or pain to no pain), with a minimum number of 20 patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
Following a sequential allocation scheme, the dexmedetomidine dose for each patient was determined by the Dixon up-and-down method. The dexmedetomidine dose for the first patient was 0.5 µg/kg. The dose was then adjusted in 0.1 µg/kg increments for the following patients depending on the success of the previous patient's block. If a patient experienced tourniquet pain prior to T0 + 50 minutes the next patient received a higher dose. If a patient did not experience pain at T0 + 50 minutes of tourniquet time the dose for the following patient was decreased. Identical syringes containing the solution mix were prepared by the principal investigator and handed to the blinded anesthesiologist in the room. Stopping rules were set at 6 independent crossovers in the same direction (no pain to pain or pain to no pain), with a minimum number of 20 patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American University of Beirut Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carine Zeeni
Assistant Professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Karam C, Al Assadi S, Kanazi G, Zeeni C. A sequential allocation study to determine the ED50 of Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 27;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01702-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANES.CZ.01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.