Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
425 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-09
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is a tremendous global burden of mental illness: Over 50 million American adults have a diagnosable mental health disorder, and major depression on its own is the leading cause of disability worldwide. In the face of this burden, clinical research has documented a variety of effective EBPs (e.g. CBT), and these psychotherapies are utilized on a massive scale. Systems have invested over $2 billion in training providers in specific EBPs. Once trained, however, therapists' adherence to the EBP, also called fidelity, is both crucial for effectiveness and difficult to assess. There is no scalable method to assess the fidelity and quality of EBPs in community practice settings. This is a foundational problem for healthcare systems.
Advances in speech processing and machine learning make technology a promising solution to this problem. The use of technology - instead of humans - to evaluate EBPs means that objective, performance-based feedback can be provided quickly, efficiently, cost-effectively, and without human error. If successful, the present research will be among the first examples of a method for building, monitoring, and assessing the quality of therapy that can scale up to large, real-world healthcare settings.
In this study, the investigators will implement an existing, fully-functional prototype (LyssnCBT) that includes a user interface geared to community mental health (CMH) clinical, supervision, and administrative workflows and needs, and then assess for effectiveness of psychotherapy supported by LyssnCBT in comparison to usual care.
This study will implement LyssnCBT in 5 community mental health agencies, beginning with a single-arm pilot field trial to identify and address any specific barriers to implementing the tool in a community mental health context. The study team will then conduct a larger study in community mental health agencies comparing LyssnCBT to services as usual.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Leveraging Telepsychology and Behavioral Economics to Increase Fidelity to CBT
NCT06601062
Optimizing Behavioral Healthcare Delivery Through Technology
NCT05745103
CBTpro: Scaling up CBT for Psychosis Using Simulated Patients and Spoken Language Technologies
NCT05127837
Digital Data in Mental Health Therapy
NCT04011540
Using Machine Learning to Optimize User Engagement and Clinical Response to Digital Mental Health Interventions
NCT05567640
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following the pilot study, the research team will recruit 4 additional CMH clinics to participate in a type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomized stepped-wedge study comparing LyssnCBT to SAU. 50 therapists and their supervisors will be recruited from the participating clinics, and each therapist will be asked to have at least 5 clients participating in the study at any given time, from among their regular caseload. Across 18 months of planned data collection (\~75 weeks), the investigators expect a minimum of 1,875 clients for 50 therapists (i.e., 50 therapists x 5 sessions per week x 75 weeks = 18,750 sessions, with an average of 10 sessions per client). All 5 clinics will start with SAU, and clinics will be randomized to begin LyssnCBT sequentially over time.
The primary data being collected throughout the project are recordings of therapy sessions, which are also collected as part of the typical operating procedures of the Penn Beck Community Initiative (BCI). CBT fidelity will be assessed by AI-generated Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS) scores for every recorded therapy session, which will be recorded via the Lyssn platform during both SAU and LyssnCBT phases of the study. For client outcomes, the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 will be collected at each session and client drop-out will be assessed via a brief monthly survey sent out to participating therapists. Finally, after three months of engagement with the LyssnCBT tools, each participating therapist and supervisor will complete our battery of implementation measures, including the system usability scale, AIM, IAM, and FIM.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LyssnCBT
Therapists will use the LyssnCBT tool with clients for recording and session-sharing functionalities. Therapists and supervisors will also have access to LyssnCBT features like speech-to-text transcription, annotation tools, and AI-generated metrics.
LyssnCBT
LyssnCBT is a technology that allows therapists and supervisors access to tools that assist with assessing CBT session fidelity, including speech-to-text transcription, annotation tools, and AI-generated metrics.
SAU (services-as-usual)
Therapists will use the LyssnCBT tool with clients for recording and session-sharing functionalities. No other LyssnCBT features will be available for therapist or supervisor review.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LyssnCBT
LyssnCBT is a technology that allows therapists and supervisors access to tools that assist with assessing CBT session fidelity, including speech-to-text transcription, annotation tools, and AI-generated metrics.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to participate in therapy sessions conducted in English
* Employed at a Philadelphia CMH treatment center that allows the recruitment and participation of therapists in research-related activities
* Willing to allow their session recordings to be used for research purposes
* Computer and internet access
Supervisors
* Oversee participating therapists
* Computer and internet access
Clients
* Able to participate in therapy sessions conducted in English
* Willing to allow the team to collect data and use their session recordings for research purposes
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lyssn.io, Inc.
INDUSTRY
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Torrey Creed
Assistant Professor of Psychology in Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Torrey A Creed, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Director, The Penn Collaborative for CBT and Implementation Science
David Atkins, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CEO, Lyssn
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Penn Collaborative for CBT and Implementation Science
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Creed TA, Salama L, Slevin R, Tanana M, Imel Z, Narayanan S, Atkins DC. Enhancing the quality of cognitive behavioral therapy in community mental health through artificial intelligence generated fidelity feedback (Project AFFECT): a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08519-9.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.