Diagnostic Value of DWI-MRI for Detection of Peritoneal Metastases in High-risk Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

NCT ID: NCT05340569

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-28

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI/MRI) has been described in recent literature as a highly sensitive and specific modality for the detection of peritoneal metastases (PM). It has been demonstrated to be superior to computed tomography (CT) for patients with known peritoneal disease from colorectal and gynaecological malignancies. However, the literature is scarce on the role of DWI/MRI in patients with pancreatic ductal-adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the added value of whole-body DWI/MRI (WB-DWI/MRI) to CT for detection of PM in the preoperative staging of patients with high-risk PDAC and evaluate how it correlates with intraoperative findings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective study from a single center. Patients will be evaluated and operated on by one of five surgeons with a subspeciality in hepato-biliary and pancreatic surgery. After thorough assessment for resectability, patients with PDAC considered resectable based on CT, but at high-risk for peritoneal disease, will be prospectively included in the study and assessed with WB-DWI/MRI within 4 weeks of the planned surgery, with the standard protocol including the following sequences: Patients will drink 1L of pineapple juice one hour prior to the examination in order to provide a negative intraluminal contrast. Patients will receive 20 mg of intravenous hyoscine butylbromide at the beginning of the MR exam in order to reduce bowel peristalsis. Sequences will include Axial et Coronal T2WI of the abdomen and pelvis, axial DWI with b values of 0, 50 and 1000 of the abdomen and pelvis, as well as Pre and post gadolinium-based contrast Axial and Coronal 3D T1WGRE. Patients with no evidence of PM on WB-DWI/MRI will be operated on and undergo pancreatic resection following the usual exploration of the peritoneal cavity in case of occult metastatic disease. Patients with suspicion of PM on WB-DWI/MRI will be approached with a diagnostic laparoscopy first, then undergo pancreatic resection if no evidence of PM is found. Each case will be followed for at least 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreas Cancer, Duct Cell Adenocarcinoma Pancreas Adenocarcinoma Peritoneal Metastases Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DWI-MRI

Patients to undergo DWI-MRI (patients include in the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

See arm description.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

See arm description.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
* Resectable disease or borderline resectable disease based on CT.
* Tumor size ≥ 3 cm.
* CA 19-9 ≥ 400 U/mL with normal bilirubin level (\< 40)
* No evidence of distant metastases.
* Patient fit for pancreatic resection (ECOG 0 or 1).

Exclusion Criteria

* Impossibility to obtain tissue diagnosis preoperatively confirming pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
* Locally advanced disease on CT.
* Tumor size \< 3 cm.
* CA 19-9 \< 400 U/mL or CA 19-9 ≥ 400 U/mL with no preoperative drainage.
* Suspicion of distant metastases, including peritoneal metastases, on CT.
* Patient who is unable to have MRI.
* Patient unfit for pancreatic resection (ECOG 2 or more).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Laval University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexandre Brind'Amour

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexandre Brind'Amour, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laval University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Québec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30207593 (View on PubMed)

De La Cruz MS, Young AP, Ruffin MT. Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2014 Apr 15;89(8):626-32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24784121 (View on PubMed)

Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, Ozawa I, Hirabayashi K, Igarashi S. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16627216 (View on PubMed)

Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):1039-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1404198. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25207767 (View on PubMed)

Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, Shroff RT. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):2008-2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32593337 (View on PubMed)

Patel CM, Sahdev A, Reznek RH. CT, MRI and PET imaging in peritoneal malignancy. Cancer Imaging. 2011 Aug 24;11(1):123-39. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21865109 (View on PubMed)

Allen VB, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, Kalia A, Davidson BR. Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 6;7(7):CD009323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009323.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27383694 (View on PubMed)

Brind'Amour A, Webb M, Parapini M, Sideris L, Segedi M, Chung SW, Chartier-Plante S, Dube P, Scudamore CH, Kim PTW. The role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2021 Apr;38(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s10585-021-10074-2. Epub 2021 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33486670 (View on PubMed)

Paracha M, Van Orden K, Patts G, Tseng J, McAneny D, Sachs T. Opportunity Lost? Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):937-943. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4855-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30478680 (View on PubMed)

Jayakrishnan TT, Zacharias AJ, Sharma A, Pappas SG, Gamblin TC, Turaga KK. Role of laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal metastases considered for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug 21;12:270. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-270.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25145962 (View on PubMed)

Vasilyeva E, Li J, Desai S, Chung SW, Scudamore CH, Segedi M, Kim PT. Impact of surgical wait times on oncologic outcomes in resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2020 Jun;22(6):892-899. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31732464 (View on PubMed)

Mattevi C, Garnier J, Marchese U, Ewald J, Gilabert M, Poizat F, Piana G, Delpero JR, Turrini O. Has the non-resection rate decreased during the last two decades among patients undergoing surgical exploration for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? BMC Surg. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00835-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32758203 (View on PubMed)

Liu X, Fu Y, Chen Q, Wu J, Gao W, Jiang K, Miao Y, Wei J. Predictors of distant metastasis on exploration in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0891-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30400836 (View on PubMed)

De Rosa A, Cameron IC, Gomez D. Indications for staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jan;18(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26776846 (View on PubMed)

Dong L, Li K, Peng T. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging/magnetic resonance imaging for peritoneal metastasis from malignant tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 5;100(5):e24251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024251.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33592867 (View on PubMed)

Dresen RC, De Vuysere S, De Keyzer F, Van Cutsem E, Prenen H, Vanslembrouck R, De Hertogh G, Wolthuis A, D'Hoore A, Vandecaveye V. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for operability assessment in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases. Cancer Imaging. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0187-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30616608 (View on PubMed)

Zhang H, Dai W, Fu C, Yan X, Stemmer A, Tong T, Cai G. Diagnostic value of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for detection of peritoneal metastases in colorectal malignancy. Cancer Biol Med. 2018 May;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0162.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29951340 (View on PubMed)

Namimoto T, Awai K, Nakaura T, Yanaga Y, Hirai T, Yamashita Y. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases. Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):745-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1185-5. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18839179 (View on PubMed)

De Vuysere S, Vandecaveye V, De Bruecker Y, Carton S, Vermeiren K, Tollens T, De Keyzer F, Dresen RC. Accuracy of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI/MRI) in diagnosis, staging and follow-up of gastric cancer, in comparison to CT: a pilot study. BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00550-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33546626 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-6186

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Single Breath Hold Abdominal MRI
NCT02434471 COMPLETED NA
Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis With FAPI-PET Imaging
NCT07098598 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3