TMS for Exposure Therapy Resistant OCD

NCT ID: NCT05331937

Last Updated: 2022-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-16

Study Completion Date

2027-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

TETRO is a multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months in 250 adult (18 years and older) OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP, aiming to establish the cost-effectiveness of low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the pre-SMA (compared to sham rTMS to the pre-SMA) as adjuvant treatment to exposure with response prevention (ERP). The treatment consists of 4 times/week rTMS combined with ERP for at least 5 weeks (20 sessions), with optional extension phase of 1 or 2 weeks (maximum of 28 sessions in total).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale:

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a serious and disabling mental disorder, characterized by obsessions and compulsions and associated with substantial comorbidity and morbidity (Stein et al. 2019). Approximately 50% of patients treated with standard treatments (exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) with/without medication) fail to respond fully, resulting in chronicity and poor participation in social and educational/occupational domains. We propose to fill the gap between the standard treatments (exposure therapy with/without medication) on the one side and invasive end-stage strategies (brain surgery) on the other side, using a non-invasive alternative: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Despite proven efficacy (Zhou et al. 2017; Rehn et al. 2018; Fitzsimmons et al. 2022), rTMS for OCD is not yet covered by the Dutch insurance system while rTMS for treatment resistant depression is. This multi-center randomized controlled trial, supported by the 'veelbelovende zorg' grant of Zorg Instituut Nederland (ZIN), aims to establish the added value of rTMS applied over the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) when combined with ERP in OCD patients, who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication). In case of proven cost-effectiveness it will lead to the addition of rTMS as insured health care for patients with OCD.

Objective: assess the (cost-)effectiveness of 1Hz rTMS to the pre-SMA as adjuvant treatment to ERP in OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication)

Study design: multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months

Study population: 250 adult (18 years and older) OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP

Intervention (if applicable): Low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the pre-SMA (compared to sham rTMS to the pre-SMA) as adjuvant treatment to ERP, 4 times/week for at least 5 weeks (20 sessions), with optional extension phase of 1 or 2 weeks (maximum of 28 sessions in total)

Main study parameters/endpoints: the pre-versus-post-treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) in severity of OCD (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale - Y-BOCS), version 2. The post-treatment Y-BOCS score will be obtained at the end of treatment, i.e, after 20, 24 or 28 sessions.

Secondary study parameters/endpoints:

* Response (≥35% reduction on Y-BOCS-v2) and remission (Y-BOCS≤12) as established through international expert opinion
* Standard Mean Difference (SMD) on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale
* Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale
* Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
* Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
* Depression, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up. In addition we will administer a visual analogue scale (VAS) for depression at these same time points, plus every week during treatment, to monitor the effects of treatment on severity of depressive symptoms.
* Anxiety, measured using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and a VAS; following the same procedure and rationale as for depression.
* Tolerability of the treatment and side effects, using an in-house questionnaire

Exploratory outcomes and/or influencing factors:

* Patient adherence to treatment protocol, as measured using the Patient Exposure and Response Prevention Adherence Scale (PEAS)
* Difference between responders and non-responders on circadian rhythm and sleep disorders at baseline as defined by the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (HSDQ).
* Structural brain network characteristics (using T1 and diffusion weighted scans) to predict treatment response / relapse.
* Functional resting-state and task-based (during emotional processing) brain network characteristics (using echo-planar imaging) to predict treatment response / relapse.
* Variation in the exact stimulation location as ascertained and recorded by neuronavigation in relation to treatment outcome.
* Contribution of demographic and clinical variables (sex, age, medication status) and pre-existing comorbidities (i.e. comorbid tics, depression, anxiety, autism) to the variance in treatment outcome.
* In OCD patients with comorbid tics: tic severity, measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS).
* Variation in treatment expectancy (7-items credibility and expectancy questionnaire (CEQ)) and blinding success (1-item question 'in which condition do you think you were?') in relation to treatment outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

1 Hz Real rTMS to the Pre-SMA 1 Hz Sham rTMS to the Pre-SMA

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

real rTMS

verum rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP

sham rTMS

sham rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* OCD as current primary diagnosis
* Age 18 and older
* Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score of 16 or higher.
* Insufficient response to state-of-the art exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) and/or drop-out from ERP due to extreme anxiety/avoidance
* The following comorbid disorders are allowed (as long as OCD is the current primary diagnosis): depression, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, tic/Tourette's disorder, eating disorders, personality disorders, autism spectrum disorder (when this does not dominate the clinical profile, i.e. is not main diagnosis).
* Commitment to actively undergo intensive exposure therapy (both supervised during ERP sessions, as well as unsupervised at home)
* Unmedicated (for at least 8 weeks) or stable dosage of psychotropic medication (for at least 8 weeks), involving serotonergic antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, clomipramine). Other psychotropic medication that is allowed (provided dosage is stably established for at least 8 weeks): methylphenidate, mood stabilizers, antipsychotic drugs
* Ability to participate in frequent treatment sessions (4 days/week, for 5 (or 6, or 7) weeks) at one of the 5 sites nearest to their home and/or work
* Ability to participate in pre-treatment MRI session (for neuronavigation) at one of the 3 academic sites nearest to their home and/or work
* Capacity for providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* OCD patients with hoarding as main symptom dimension
* The following comorbid disorders (current diagnosis) are not allowed: psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder (when this dominates the clinical profile, i.e. is diagnosed as main disorder), substance use disorder
* Active suicidal thoughts and intent to act on it
* Chronic use of benzodiazepines is not allowed
* Cochlear implant
* (History of) epilepsy
* Pregnancy
* Extreme claustrophobia or metallic objects in or on the body, preventing from participation in MRI session
* Space-occupying lesion on MRI
* Previous rTMS treatment (for blinding reasons)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GGZ inGeest

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

ProPersona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mondriaan

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Neurocare

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

O.A. van den Heuvel

prof.dr. (MD PhD)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

GGZ inGeest

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Neurocare

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Neurocare

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Maastricht UMC+

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Mondriaan

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

ProPersona

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Odile A van den Heuvel, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31-20-4444444

Tjardo S Postma, MD

Role: CONTACT

+31-20-4444444

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Odile A van den Heuvel, MD PhD

Role: primary

+31-20-4444444

Neeltje M Batelaan, MD PhD

Role: primary

+31-20-788 4641

Iris van Oostrom, PhD

Role: primary

+31-24-7503507

Iris van Oostrom, PhD

Role: primary

+31-24-7503507

Alexander Sack, PhD

Role: primary

Koen Schruers, MD PhD

Role: primary

+31-88-5066262

Gert-Jan Hendriks, MD PhD

Role: primary

+31-06-13 578578

Indira Tendolkar, MD PhD

Role: primary

+31-24-3613489

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fitzsimmons SMDD, van der Werf YD, van Campen AD, Arns M, Sack AT, Hoogendoorn AW; other members of the TETRO Consortium; van den Heuvel OA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and pairwise/network meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.048. Epub 2022 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35041869 (View on PubMed)

Rehn S, Eslick GD, Brakoulias V. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Cortical Targets Used in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):645-665. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9566-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29423665 (View on PubMed)

Zhou DD, Wang W, Wang GM, Li DQ, Kuang L. An updated meta-analysis: Short-term therapeutic effects of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jun;215:187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.033. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28340445 (View on PubMed)

Stein DJ, Costa DLC, Lochner C, Miguel EC, Reddy YCJ, Shavitt RG, van den Heuvel OA, Simpson HB. Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Aug 1;5(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0102-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31371720 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021.0670 - NL78930.029.21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.