Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-16
2027-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TMS + Exposure Therapy for Pediatric OCD
NCT05931913
Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Efficacy on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
NCT00822601
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as an add-on Treatment for Resistant OCD
NCT01043900
TMS-induced Plasticity Improving Cognitive Control in OCD
NCT03667807
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders
NCT02511392
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a serious and disabling mental disorder, characterized by obsessions and compulsions and associated with substantial comorbidity and morbidity (Stein et al. 2019). Approximately 50% of patients treated with standard treatments (exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) with/without medication) fail to respond fully, resulting in chronicity and poor participation in social and educational/occupational domains. We propose to fill the gap between the standard treatments (exposure therapy with/without medication) on the one side and invasive end-stage strategies (brain surgery) on the other side, using a non-invasive alternative: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Despite proven efficacy (Zhou et al. 2017; Rehn et al. 2018; Fitzsimmons et al. 2022), rTMS for OCD is not yet covered by the Dutch insurance system while rTMS for treatment resistant depression is. This multi-center randomized controlled trial, supported by the 'veelbelovende zorg' grant of Zorg Instituut Nederland (ZIN), aims to establish the added value of rTMS applied over the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) when combined with ERP in OCD patients, who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication). In case of proven cost-effectiveness it will lead to the addition of rTMS as insured health care for patients with OCD.
Objective: assess the (cost-)effectiveness of 1Hz rTMS to the pre-SMA as adjuvant treatment to ERP in OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP (alone or combined with medication)
Study design: multi-center placebo-controlled double-blind randomized controlled trial with an intervention phase of 5-7 weeks and a follow-up phase of 12 months
Study population: 250 adult (18 years and older) OCD patients who show no/insufficient response to ERP
Intervention (if applicable): Low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the pre-SMA (compared to sham rTMS to the pre-SMA) as adjuvant treatment to ERP, 4 times/week for at least 5 weeks (20 sessions), with optional extension phase of 1 or 2 weeks (maximum of 28 sessions in total)
Main study parameters/endpoints: the pre-versus-post-treatment standardized mean difference (SMD) in severity of OCD (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale - Y-BOCS), version 2. The post-treatment Y-BOCS score will be obtained at the end of treatment, i.e, after 20, 24 or 28 sessions.
Secondary study parameters/endpoints:
* Response (≥35% reduction on Y-BOCS-v2) and remission (Y-BOCS≤12) as established through international expert opinion
* Standard Mean Difference (SMD) on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale
* Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement scale
* Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
* Societal costs, measured through the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
* Depression, measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up. In addition we will administer a visual analogue scale (VAS) for depression at these same time points, plus every week during treatment, to monitor the effects of treatment on severity of depressive symptoms.
* Anxiety, measured using the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and a VAS; following the same procedure and rationale as for depression.
* Tolerability of the treatment and side effects, using an in-house questionnaire
Exploratory outcomes and/or influencing factors:
* Patient adherence to treatment protocol, as measured using the Patient Exposure and Response Prevention Adherence Scale (PEAS)
* Difference between responders and non-responders on circadian rhythm and sleep disorders at baseline as defined by the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (HSDQ).
* Structural brain network characteristics (using T1 and diffusion weighted scans) to predict treatment response / relapse.
* Functional resting-state and task-based (during emotional processing) brain network characteristics (using echo-planar imaging) to predict treatment response / relapse.
* Variation in the exact stimulation location as ascertained and recorded by neuronavigation in relation to treatment outcome.
* Contribution of demographic and clinical variables (sex, age, medication status) and pre-existing comorbidities (i.e. comorbid tics, depression, anxiety, autism) to the variance in treatment outcome.
* In OCD patients with comorbid tics: tic severity, measured using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS).
* Variation in treatment expectancy (7-items credibility and expectancy questionnaire (CEQ)) and blinding success (1-item question 'in which condition do you think you were?') in relation to treatment outcome.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
real rTMS
verum rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
sham rTMS
sham rTMS condition, 1500 continuous 1-Hz pulses to the pre-SMA
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
rTMS (real versus sham) is used as adjuvant to ERP
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 and older
* Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) score of 16 or higher.
* Insufficient response to state-of-the art exposure therapy with response prevention (ERP) and/or drop-out from ERP due to extreme anxiety/avoidance
* The following comorbid disorders are allowed (as long as OCD is the current primary diagnosis): depression, other anxiety disorders, ADHD, tic/Tourette's disorder, eating disorders, personality disorders, autism spectrum disorder (when this does not dominate the clinical profile, i.e. is not main diagnosis).
* Commitment to actively undergo intensive exposure therapy (both supervised during ERP sessions, as well as unsupervised at home)
* Unmedicated (for at least 8 weeks) or stable dosage of psychotropic medication (for at least 8 weeks), involving serotonergic antidepressants (SSRI, SNRI, clomipramine). Other psychotropic medication that is allowed (provided dosage is stably established for at least 8 weeks): methylphenidate, mood stabilizers, antipsychotic drugs
* Ability to participate in frequent treatment sessions (4 days/week, for 5 (or 6, or 7) weeks) at one of the 5 sites nearest to their home and/or work
* Ability to participate in pre-treatment MRI session (for neuronavigation) at one of the 3 academic sites nearest to their home and/or work
* Capacity for providing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* The following comorbid disorders (current diagnosis) are not allowed: psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder (when this dominates the clinical profile, i.e. is diagnosed as main disorder), substance use disorder
* Active suicidal thoughts and intent to act on it
* Chronic use of benzodiazepines is not allowed
* Cochlear implant
* (History of) epilepsy
* Pregnancy
* Extreme claustrophobia or metallic objects in or on the body, preventing from participation in MRI session
* Space-occupying lesion on MRI
* Previous rTMS treatment (for blinding reasons)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GGZ inGeest
OTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
ProPersona
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Mondriaan
UNKNOWN
Neurocare
OTHER
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
O.A. van den Heuvel
prof.dr. (MD PhD)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
GGZ inGeest
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Neurocare
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
Neurocare
Groningen, , Netherlands
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Mondriaan
Maastricht, , Netherlands
ProPersona
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fitzsimmons SMDD, van der Werf YD, van Campen AD, Arns M, Sack AT, Hoogendoorn AW; other members of the TETRO Consortium; van den Heuvel OA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and pairwise/network meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.048. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
Rehn S, Eslick GD, Brakoulias V. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Cortical Targets Used in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):645-665. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9566-7.
Zhou DD, Wang W, Wang GM, Li DQ, Kuang L. An updated meta-analysis: Short-term therapeutic effects of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jun;215:187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.033. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Stein DJ, Costa DLC, Lochner C, Miguel EC, Reddy YCJ, Shavitt RG, van den Heuvel OA, Simpson HB. Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Aug 1;5(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0102-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021.0670 - NL78930.029.21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.