Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
117 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-03-28
2023-06-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Leadless Pacemakers Versus Left Bundle Area Pacing - A Preliminary Exploration
NCT06690333
Quality of Life in Patients Treated With Leadless Pacemakers
NCT05958836
Longitudinal Coverage With Evidence Development Study on Micra Leadless Pacemakers
NCT03039712
Factors Affecting Selection of Leadless Pacemaker and Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Status
NCT06587672
Key Factors of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation With Implantation Site, Complications and Prognosis
NCT05761821
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Preference Survey
Patient preference survey on implantable cardiac pacemaker systems
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Willing and able to use a tablet or computer to complete the survey
* Scheduled to undergo evaluation for a de novo cardiac pacemaker at the study site (patient may or may not have a known indication for a pacemaker at the time)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shelby Reed, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Honor Health
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Arrhythmia Research Group
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Arkansas Heart Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Pacific Heart Institute
Santa Monica, California, United States
Baptist Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Prairie Education & Research Cooperative
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Charlton Memorial Hospital
Fall River, Massachusetts, United States
New York Presbyterian Hospital/Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Hightower Clinical
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
University of Utah Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Reed SD, Yang JC, Wallace MJ, Sutphin J, Johnson FR, Ozdemir S, Delgado SM, Goates S, Harbert N, Lo M, Rajagopalan B, Ip JE, Al-Khatib SM. Patient Preferences for Features Associated With Leadless Versus Conventional Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Dec;17(12):e011168. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011168. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ABT-CIP-10435
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.