Evaluation of Pain Trajectories After Surgery and Their Potential Relationship With Chronicity at 3 Months
NCT ID: NCT05326737
Last Updated: 2022-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
5000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-23
2024-05-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thirty percent of patients who undergo surgery suffer from chronic post-surgical pain, of which 5 to 10% are of severe intensity. Many preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, related to the patient, the surgical procedure, or the anesthetic technique, have been incriminated as risk factors for chronic post-surgical pain. The severity of acute postoperative pain is recognized as one of the risk factors for the occurrence of chronic post-surgical pain on which we can hope to interact during the peri-operative period.
In this cohort study, we wish to define the typologies of postoperative pain trajectories observed from Day 0 to Day 7 and to estimate the proportion of patients with an abnormal resolution of pain in a model of organization such as that of our institution, in classic hospitalization and in ambulatory care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Characterization of Post-operative Pain Trajectories Over Seven Days and Links With Chronicity
NCT02599233
Acute Preoperative Pain and Chronic Post-surgical Pain in Emergency Surgery
NCT06555107
Assessment of the Development of Postoperative Persistent Postoperative Pain
NCT05370924
Neuropathic Evaluation of Postoperative Pain
NCT02826317
Phenomics and Genomics of Clinically Relevant Chronic Postsurgical Pain
NCT04798573
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The study population
The study population consists of adult surgery patients at the Nîmes University Hospital, with recruitment based on the operating theater program and for a predefined list of surgeries.
In hospital pain evaluation
Patients will evaluate their pain levels via a verbal numerical scale on days 1(or-1), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 \& 7.
In hospital questionnaires
Patients are required to fill out the PCS questionnaire between on day -1 or +1.
Telephone contact at 3 months
Patients will be contacted at 3 months post-surgery for pain questionnaires DN4 and EQ5D5L.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
In hospital pain evaluation
Patients will evaluate their pain levels via a verbal numerical scale on days 1(or-1), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 \& 7.
In hospital questionnaires
Patients are required to fill out the PCS questionnaire between on day -1 or +1.
Telephone contact at 3 months
Patients will be contacted at 3 months post-surgery for pain questionnaires DN4 and EQ5D5L.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient is available for 3 months of follow-up
* The patient has undergone a planned surgical procedure in one of the participating departments
* The patient is willing and able to respond to the study questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria
* The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
* The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
* It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
* Patient admitted to the ICU and still intubated at day 1
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joël L'Hermite, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
Sullivan, M. J., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychological assessment, 1995, 7(4), 524.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-A03223-36
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LOCAL/2020/PC-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.