Obstetric Outcomes After Double Embryo Transfer

NCT ID: NCT05322278

Last Updated: 2024-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

927 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-30

Study Completion Date

2024-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim ; to compare obstetric outcomes in relation to number of embryo transfer in ICSI

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Assisted reproductive technology with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and IVF is becoming an international direction for couples struggling with infertility. The increasing popularity and frequency of these techniques and the data generated from it has given us a better overview of the efficacy, consequences and costs of these techniques.

The aim of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is to achieve pregnancy while decreasing the risk of multiple gestations. When compared with elective single embryo transfer (SET), double embryo transfer (DET) demonstrates a superior pregnancy and live birth rate with a significantly higher risk of multiple gestations. The high frequency of multiple births is the main factor which leads to adverse outcome in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Transfer of two embryos does not diminish the chance of a birth when compared with three embryo transfer. How would be the obstetric outcome in pregnancies resulting from DET in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Despite achieving a higher pregnancy rates, DET in ART leads to an increase in multiple gestation pregnancies, which are associated with increased both maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Twin pregnancies have a higher incidence of preterm cesarean sections , admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and other maternal complications, when compared with singleton pregnancies. Twin pregnancies have a higher incidence of preterm cesarean sections , admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and other maternal complications, when compared with singleton pregnancies.

Most patients prefer to have two embryos transferred, due to financial considerations being the main reason.

Studies demonstrate that patients are more likely prefer to choose SET when educated about the risks of multiple gestation pregnancy, but select two embryos for transfer if they have a lower pregnancy rate when compared with transferring one embryo .

Cost effectiveness research comparing single versus DET after in vitro fertilization (IVF) has previously been performed, with most studies taking place in areas with mandated IVF insurance coverage, and few incorporating hospital costs linked to obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Double-Embryo Transfer in ICSI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single Embryo Transfer

Single Embryo Transfer

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

No interventions

Double embryo transfer

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

No interventions

3 embryo transfer

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

No interventions

4 embryo transfer

Data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

No interventions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Data collection

No interventions

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patients subjected with ICSI pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria

* incomplete data
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Shehata Mohamed Ismail

Faculty of medicine, Assiut University, 71515 Assiut, Egypt

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sherif Mohamed Abd Elmageed Badran, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clua E, Roca-Feliu M, Tresanchez M, Latre L, Rodriguez I, Martinez F, Barri PN, Veiga A. Single or double embryo transfer? Decision-making process in patients participating in an oocyte donation program. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;36(4):365-369. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1653845. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31464145 (View on PubMed)

Gremeau AS, Brugnon F, Bouraoui Z, Peikhrishvili R, Janny L, Pouly JL. [Outcome of elective single or double embryo transfer in first and second IVF/ICSI cycles]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011 Feb;39(2):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.08.005. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21316284 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DET in ICSI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Uterine Peristalsis in IVF
NCT06036459 NOT_YET_RECRUITING