Inverting Grayscale Improves Detection of Proximal Femur Fracture

NCT ID: NCT05318378

Last Updated: 2022-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-31

Study Completion Date

2022-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Proximal femur fractures (PFF) are a worldwide public health concern. A delay in the diagnosis and treatment worsens the prognosis. Inversion of grayscale is a tool available on most X-rays visualization software, and its use has been suggested to improve radiological diagnosis. The study aims to determine if using inverted grayscale radiography results in better diagnoses of PFF among medical students.

Material and Methods. The investigators evaluated the detection of PFF by fifth-year medical students on a series of 30 pelvis X-rays. The series was composed of 20 X-rays with PFF and 10 X-rays without fracture. A first reading session was set up where X-rays were presented separately in conventional and inverted grayscale. A second session one month later showed both grayscale visualizations together (BIcontrast X-rays Analysis Method - BIXAM). X-rays' order of appearance was randomized. The investigators performed the same evaluation on senior orthopedic surgeons as a control. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed for each method (conventional, inverted, and BIXAM) with the McNemar test. Subgroup analyses were performed on the fracture localization (femoral neck, trochanteric).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diagnoses Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
We built two series of images. Series one was composed of separated conventional and inverted images. Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together (Figure). An independent assessor randomly duplicated four and two images for series one and two, respectively, to evaluate the intra-observer agreement. The same assessor randomized the images' order of appearance for the two series with a free online available list randomizer (www.randomizer.org). The principal investigator was blinded to the randomization during the sessions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

student

Twenty fifth-year medical students were asked to participate in the study

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BIXAM

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together

senior surgeon

As controls, we asked 3 independent board-certified orthopedic surgeons to participate in the study following the same conditions as described previously.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

BIXAM

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BIXAM

Series two consisted of inverted and conventional X-rays of the same subject (BIXAM) shown together

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* fifth-year medical students

Exclusion Criteria

* other medical students
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre de l'arthrose, Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

cedric maillot

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

APHP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aphp

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

cedric maillot, msc

Role: CONTACT

0611789158

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

maillot cedric, msc

Role: primary

0611789158

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIXAM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.