Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-10-31
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At all three timepoints of image assessment, a questionnaire with the same set of 7 criteria (Q1-Q7) for assessing the radiographs is used. The criteria refer to the content of the educational material.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Observational Study Based on a Cohort of Geriatric Patients With Hip Fracture Treated in the Centers Belonging to the GIOG Group
NCT05150249
Proximal Femur Image Database Validation
NCT06351943
Trochanteric Fractures - How to Improve the Results of Reduction and Implant Positioning
NCT03875443
Contribution of Stereography (EOS Imaging System) in the Quantification of Femoral Shaft Fractures.
NCT03251534
A Prospective Observational Study of Artificial Intelligence Morphometric Evaluation of Vertebral Fractures
NCT06449742
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Individually, the 5 surgeons per clinic review the 25 postimplant intraoperative lateral images filed for 5 retrospective cases using a set of predefined criteria.
After this first assessment of retrospective cases, the group watches a video and a poster and has one hour of time to discuss it. The group reviews the 25 cases from the pre-education step again within a period of maximum 5 days. The data are analyzed at AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation (AOCID) and provided to the surgeons for data review meeting where they agree on areas for improvement and set target goals for the prospective series. For the whole period of the second assessment and the prospective series, the poster is placed in the area of the operating room.
After patient information/consent, eligible patients are included into the prospective part of the study and treated with either an intramedullary nail or a DHS. During the surgery, the surgeons use the newly achieved knowledge to record images.
In the next step, the 5 surgeons per clinic review individually 25 postimplant intraoperative lateral images of 5 prospective cases using the same set of predefined criteria. The data are analyzed at AOCID and review by the Imaging Working Group of AO Education.
The data are not transferred between the clinics. The main outcomes will be assessed based on the "Questionnaire for the assessment of the lateral intraoperative view of the proximal femur".
This questionnaire consists of seven questions, on image quality (Q1 and Q2; part A) and on quality of reduction and surgery (Q3 - Q7; part B). Q1 and Q2 allow only "yes/no" answers, with an option to comment on the answer "no". Q3 to Q5 are based on anatomical assessments and Q6 and Q7 ask for evaluation of the surgery. There is a "not assessable" answer option for all questions of part B.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective group
One x-ray image per patient is assessed by the surgeon. The surgeon undergoes an educational intervention (video/poster) and applies the achieved knowledge during the second assessment of the same image. The intervention is not administered to patients, only to an image.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prosp.group (Application of knowledge)
No direct intervention at the patient. The surgeon applies the achieved knowledge during the performance of the fluoroscopy in the operating room. This image is assessed.
Application of knowledge
Educational Intervention has been performed at the treating surgeon (video and poster). The surgeons applies the achieved knowledge when performing the intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients with pertrochanteric fractures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Application of knowledge
Educational Intervention has been performed at the treating surgeon (video and poster). The surgeons applies the achieved knowledge when performing the intraoperative fluoroscopy in patients with pertrochanteric fractures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of a pertrochanteric femoral fracture (AO 31-A1, A2, A3)
* Surgical treatment with either a Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), a PFNA-II, a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or a Titanium Trochanteric Fixation Nail System (TFN)
For the prospective part of the study:
Informed consent obtained, i.e.:
* Ability to understand the content of the patient information/Informed Consent Form
* Willingness to allow the use of health-related data (images) according to the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP)
* Signed and dated Ethics Committee (EC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel Rikli, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Hospital of the Medical University Graz
Graz, , Austria
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
Cantonal Hospital Winterthur
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Municipal Hospital Triemli
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Heetveld MJ, Raaymakers EL, van Walsum AD, Barei DP, Steller EP. Observer assessment of femoral neck radiographs after reduction and dynamic hip screw fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Apr;125(3):160-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0780-4. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Walter SD, Heels-Ansdell D, Sanders D, Schemitsch E, Guyatt GH. Interobserver reliability of classification systems to rate the quality of femoral neck fracture reduction. J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jul;23(6):408-12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815ea017.
Rushton MN, Rushton VE, Worthington HV. The value of a quality improvement programme for panoramic radiography: a cluster randomised controlled trial. J Dent. 2013 Apr;41(4):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Zisblatt L, Kues JR, Davis N, Willis CE. The long-term impact of a performance improvement continuing medical education intervention on osteoporosis screening. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Fall;33(4):206-14. doi: 10.1002/chp.21200.
Cannon CP, Hoekstra JW, Larson DM, Karcher RB, Mencia WA, Berry CA, Stowell SA. A report of quality improvement in the care of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Mar;10(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e318204eb8b.
Krettek C, Miclau T, Grun O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Intraoperative control of axes, rotation and length in femoral and tibial fractures. Technical note. Injury. 1998;29 Suppl 3:C29-39. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)95006-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PI program II
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.