Fetal Scalp Stimulation Versus Fetal Blood Sampling in Labour

NCT ID: NCT05306756

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-10

Study Completion Date

2023-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pregnant women have routine monitoring of the baby's heart rate when in labour. Women with complicated pregnancies require continuous monitoring using an electronic recorder called a CTG. The CTG produces a paper based recording which is interpreted by the midwife as showing normal, suspicious or abnormal features of the baby's heart rate. Babies quite commonly demonstrate abnormal features from time to time during the course of labour. In some cases the abnormal features are of sufficient concern to warrant delivery by emergency caesarean section. In most of these cases the baby is born in good condition and the question arises whether the caesarean section was unnecessary. In order to reduce the chance of an unnecessary caesarean section additional "second-line" tests can be offered. One such test is where a small drop of blood is taken from the baby's scalp. This test involves an internal examination with an instrument to visualise the baby's head and a small scratch to the baby's scalp. The blood is tested for acid which is an indicator of whether or not the baby is receiving enough oxygen. The test is called a fetal blood sample or FBS. An alternative test is where the doctor or midwife performs a vaginal examination with two fingers and gently rubs the baby's scalp in an attempt to cause an increase in the baby's heart rate. This is a healthy response suggesting that the baby is receiving enough oxygen. The test is called digital fetal scalp stimulation or dFSS. These two "second-line" tests have never been compared in a properly conducted head-to-head comparison. This study aims to compare dFSS and FBS in a large clinical trial completed within four of Ireland's largest maternity hospitals. This trial will generate important evidence of direct relevance to clinical care and patient outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Continuous electronic fetal heart rate recording with cardiotocography (CTG) is a standard approach to monitoring fetal wellbeing in labour and is recommended for high-risk pregnancies. The aim is to identify fetal compromise early and intervene in order to reduce serious adverse events such as cerebral palsy and perinatal death. CTG abnormalities are relatively common and can lead to the decision to deliver by emergency caesarean section. In most cases the fetus is subsequently found to have been compensating for the stress of labour and is not actually compromised. Fetal blood sampling (FBS) is a second-line invasive test that provides information on the acid-base status of the fetus, reflecting hypoxia. It is used to provide either reassurance that labour can continue, or more objective evidence that delivery needs to be expedited. Clinical guidelines in the United Kingdom and Ireland have treated FBS as a gold standard test. Recent studies have questioned the validity and reliability of FBS, and also the logistic challenges of achieving a result in a timely manner. Fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) by digital rubbing is an alternative less invasive test of fetal wellbeing in labour and is recommended in preference to FBS in US guidelines. This research aims to compare digital FSS and FBS in women with term singleton pregnancies and an abnormal intrapartum CTG, where additional information on fetal wellbeing is required. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial will be conducted. The clinical outcomes of interest will include caesarean section, assisted vaginal birth, low Apgar scores, cord blood acidosis, and admission to the neonatal unit. This trial will generate important evidence of direct relevance to clinical care and patient outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intrapartum Fetal Distress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients in labor with CTG abnormalities that warrant second-line testing of fetal wellbeing - randomized to digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) versus fetal blood sampling (FBS)
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The primary and perinatal secondary outcomes will be recorded from the computerised delivery record without knowledge of the allocation.

The principal investigator will play no role in the care of the patient or assessment of outcomes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fetal Blood Sampling (FBS)

Fetal capillary blood samples will be collected in heparinised tubes and analysed in the delivery suite using the locally available gas analyser. The result of the first technically reliable sample, or the lowest reliable sample if multiple samples are tested, will be interpreted and acted upon according to the protocol, taking account of the clinical circumstances and the stage of labour:

pH ≥7.25 normal, continue and if indicated repeat in 60 minutes; pH 7.21-7.24 borderline, repeat in 30 minutes; pH ≤ 7.20 abnormal, deliver.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fetal Blood Sampling (FBS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Vaginal examination, insert amnioscope through cervix, visualise fetal scalp, clean fetal scalp, apply ethyl chloride spray, wipe scalp with petroleum gel, small scalp scratch with sharp instrument, collect sample in heparinised capillary tube, analyse sample.

digital Fetal Scalp Stimulation (dFSS)

The examiner will stimulate the fetal scalp digitally with the index and middle finger over a period of 30-60 seconds.The CTG will be observed over a 5-10 minutes interval after the dFSS and if a fetal heart rate acceleration (\>15 bpm for 15 seconds) is observed the test will be considered normal. If there is an episode of normal variability (5-25 bpm) but there is no clear acceleration, the test will be considered borderline. If there is no FHR acceleration and no episode of normal variability with ongoing abnormal features, the test should be interpreted as abnormal in the same way as an abnormal FBS result.

FHR acceleration normal, if indicated repeat in 60 min; Uncertain acceleration/ normal variability borderline, repeat in 30 minutes; No Acceleration/ongoing abnormal features abnormal, deliver.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

digital Fetal Scalp Stimulation (dFSS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Vaginal examination, insert one or two fingers through cervix onto fetal scalp, rub fetal scalp digitally for approximately 30-60 seconds, withdraw fingers and observe CTG for 5-10 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fetal Blood Sampling (FBS)

Vaginal examination, insert amnioscope through cervix, visualise fetal scalp, clean fetal scalp, apply ethyl chloride spray, wipe scalp with petroleum gel, small scalp scratch with sharp instrument, collect sample in heparinised capillary tube, analyse sample.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

digital Fetal Scalp Stimulation (dFSS)

Vaginal examination, insert one or two fingers through cervix onto fetal scalp, rub fetal scalp digitally for approximately 30-60 seconds, withdraw fingers and observe CTG for 5-10 minutes.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nulliparous women
* Singleton pregnancy
* Cephalic presentation
* Gestational age 37+0 weeks or greater
* Abnormal CTG that requires second-line testing (FBS or dFSS)

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to FBS
* Limited understanding of English
* At the discretion of the responsible obstetrician in cases where there is urgency
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College Cork

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Limerick

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Health Research Board, Ireland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Health Research Board - Trials Methodology Research Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Dublin, Trinity College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Deirdre J Murphy

Professor of Obstetrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deirdre J Murphy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Trinity College, University of Dublin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hughes O, Murphy DJ. Comparing second-line tests to assess fetal wellbeing in Labor: a feasibility study and pilot randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jan;35(1):91-99. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1712704. Epub 2020 Jan 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31928269 (View on PubMed)

Yambasu S, Boland F, O'Donoghue K, Curran C, Shahabuddin Y, Cotter A, Gaffney G, Devane D, Molloy EJ, Murphy DJ. Digital Foetal Scalp Stimulation Versus Foetal Blood Sampling to Assess Foetal Well-Being in Labour: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):557-564. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18068. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39780658 (View on PubMed)

Murphy DJ, Shahabuddin Y, Yambasu S, O'Donoghue K, Devane D, Cotter A, Gaffney G, Burke LA, Molloy EJ, Boland F. Digital fetal scalp stimulation (dFSS) versus fetal blood sampling (FBS) to assess fetal wellbeing in labour-a multi-centre randomised controlled trial: Fetal Intrapartum Randomised Scalp Stimulation Trial (FIRSST NCT05306756). Trials. 2022 Oct 4;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06794-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36195894 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DIFA019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fetal Pulse Oximetry Trial (FOX)
NCT00098709 TERMINATED PHASE3
Trial of Underwater Birth
NCT07313319 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA