Breast CANcer Risk Assessment in Younger Women: BCAN-RAY
NCT ID: NCT05305963
Last Updated: 2023-07-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-31
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are three main objectives to the study.
Objective 1 - Mammographic Density and Risk To define the magnitude of BC risk associated with MD in women aged 30-39 and facilitate its incorporation into risk prediction models.
Objective 2 - Psychological impact
To examine the feasibility of a strategy to offer breast cancer risk-assessment to diverse ethnic and socioeconomic populations of women in their 30s, assessing:
* Potential benefits and harms
* Impact on health inequalities
* Acceptability
Objective 3 - DNA Methylation substudy To explore the potential of DNA Methylation (DNAme) signatures from self-obtained cervical samples to further refine risk prediction algorithms
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of Breast Cancer Risk Evaluation in Women From the General Population
NCT02997384
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Women Aged 40-49
NCT03180086
Reproductive Health in Breast Cancer Survivor
NCT06756802
Towards Early Detection of Breast Cancer in High Risk Population
NCT05268913
A Mammography FastTrack Program in Increasing the Number of Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Screening
NCT00462891
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The reasons for this dramatic increase in incidence in young women are not well understood and contrast with other endocrine sensitive organs (endometrium and ovary) in which cancer rates increase much later in life. Cervical cancer mortality reduced dramatically, including in young women, following the introduction of widespread screening starting in women in their 20s. This was aided by the identification of key risk factors (sexual activity and HPV infection), direct access to the cervical epithelium and an identifiable premalignant stage. In contrast, in the UK, a strong family history (FH) of BC is the only trigger for BC risk assessment and the opportunity for women aged under 50 to access genetic testing, enhanced screening and primary prevention programmes (NICE 2013). However, in women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 40 at least 65% do not have a FH, the proportion increasing further in those diagnosed in older age cohorts (Copson 2018; Eccles 2015).
In addition, BC in young women is more frequently lethal, due to a combination of later stage at presentation, due in part to the lack of screening programmes, and a greater proportion of women developing more aggressive BC subtypes (Colleoni 2002; Paik 2006). The reliance on FH belies the progress over recent decades in the identification of additional BC risk factors including those related to reproductive/lifestyle influences, polygenic risk scores (PRS) and mammographic density (MD) and their incorporation into robust risk prediction algorithms.
The Predicting Risk Of Cancer At Screening (PROCAS NIHR Ref: RP-PG-0707-10031) study recruited over 58,000 women (aged 47-73y) from the Greater Manchester National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) and showed that it is possible to accurately estimate a woman's individual risk of developing BC through self-report questions and assessment of MD and PRS (van Veen 2018). Using FH alone, only 3.7% of women were identified as being at moderate to high risk of BC according to NICE guidelines (NICE 2017) whereas the comprehensive approach above classified 18% as at least moderate risk and with excellent calibration (observed to expected OR 0.98; 95%CI 0.69-1.28; van Veen 2018). At least 30% of the BC's across the whole population developed in this cohort, a value that exceeded 40% when additional validated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were incorporated into the PRS (Brentnall 2020). Women in the moderate/high risk groups can then be offered enhanced screening with predicted improvements in survival (Evans 2014) and preventive medications that result in fewer BC and are cost saving to the NHS (NICE 2017). A follow-on study has been developed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of integrating this approach into the NHSBSP (French 2020).
The current study has been designed to test whether a similar approach is acceptable in women aged 30-39 years and through use of a case control design will assess the impact of mammographic density on BC risk in women of this age. To facilitate the approach, we have developed a web-based application (WBA) based on the Tyrer-Cuzick (T-C) algorithm (see section 1.2 below) and an Automated Low Dose Risk Assessment Mammography (ALDRAM) technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Case
250 women diagnosed with BC when they were aged 30-39 years
Mammogram
mammogram
Control
750 controls currently aged 30-39 years
Mammogram
mammogram
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mammogram
mammogram
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
4.1.1.1 Cases
* Born biologically female
* Aged 30-39 years when diagnosed with breast cancer
* Able to provide informed consent
4.1.1.2 Controls
* Born biologically female
* Aged 30-39 years
* Able to provide informed consent
4.1.2 Acceptability Substudy All control participants that are eligible for the main study are eligible for inclusion in the acceptability substudy.
4.1.3 DNA methylation substudy
Case participants will only be eligible for the DNAme substudy if they fulfill all eligibility criteria for the main study and the following inclusion criterion:
• Yet to receive any systemic therapy for early breast cancer (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or targeted therapy eg trastuzumab (Herceptin))
All control participants are eligible for the DNAme substudy if eligibility criteria are met for the main study.
30 Years
39 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wythenshawe Hospital
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hindmarch S, Howell SJ, Usher-Smith JA, Gorman L, Evans DG, French DP. Feasibility and acceptability of offering breast cancer risk assessment to general population women aged 30-39 years: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e078555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078555.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
309424
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.