Culturally Tailoring an Advance Care Planning Intervention for American Indians

NCT ID: NCT05304117

Last Updated: 2025-07-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-04

Study Completion Date

2024-03-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project has three specific aims: (1) culturally tailor the content of the Make Your Wishes about You (MY WAY) ACP curriculum and guide for one American Indian tribe; (2) assess the feasibility of the culturally-tailored MY WAY ACP curriculum and patient education guide with the tribe; and (3) examine preliminary outcomes of the culturally-tailored MY WAY ACP curriculum and guide with 70 tribal members. Upon successful completion, it is expected that this project will develop a feasible culturally-tailored MY WAY that through a quasi-experimental waitlist design shows promise as an efficacious program with respect to self-efficacy, readiness, and ACP completion that increases facilitators and decreases barriers to ACP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research Design. A quasi-experimental waitlist study design will be used to test the hypothesis that the intervention participants will experience increased ACP self-efficacy, readiness, and completion rates. It is also expected that the intervention participants will experience increased facilitators and decreased barriers to ACP. A control sample of waitlist participants will be used.

Based on the odds of completing an ACP indicated in previously implemented MY WAY interventions and using 90% power as a threshold, it is estimated that will be a need for at least an n = 60 to find effects. The intervention group, Cohort 1, will be those who participated in the first round of both the Community Educational Sessions and Sharing Sessions. The control group, Cohort 2, will be those who participated in the second round of both the Community Education Sessions and Sharing Sessions.

Measurement. Process Measures that are a part of the 9-item ACP Engagement Survey that includes measurement of self-efficacy and readiness, identified from Behavioral Change Theory, will be used. Self-efficacy and readiness subscales have Likert responses of "not at all, a little, somewhat, fairly, extremely" and have good reliability and discriminant validity. Barriers and Facilitators to ACP Questionnaire used in the MY WAY randomized controlled trial will be used. Pretest interviews with these measurements will be conducted by telephone or in person at the time of pre-registration for both cohorts by the Project Coordinator and team members.

Cohort 1 will be interviewed five times: Baseline pretest, Community Information Session Evaluation; Sharing Session Evaluation, 8 week-post test and 6 month post-test.

Cohort 2 will be interviewed five times: Baseline pretest, 2nd baseline control pretest, waitlist Community Information Session evaluation, and waitlist Sharing Session evaluation, 8 week post test.

The first interview at registration will serve as baseline for the waitlist group, Cohort 2. Cohort 2 will be contacted again approximately 6 months later and two-weeks prior to the second Community Education Session to remind them of their registration and to re-interview them for their intervention pretest. Posttest interviews will also be conducted by the Project Coordinator eight weeks post Sharing Session for both groups to capture ACP self-efficacy, readiness, and completion rates.

Statistical Analyses. Demographic characteristics will be examined using descriptive statistics (frequencies, measures of central tendency, measures of variation) and stratified analyses (e.g., delineating measures by demographics, attendance, ACP agreement etc.) to examine the association between demographics and program outcomes. ACP Engagement and the Barriers and Facilitators to ACP Questionnaire (ACP measures) will be compared between those who do and do not engage in Sharing Sessions and between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. The tribal community as well as location of Community Education Session will be included in all analyses as nested participant variables to ensure that differences between tribal communities and education delivery do not significantly change results. To account for these nested variables, hierarchical linear modeling or a similar method will be used in comparison analyses. It is likely that there will be significant attrition from Community Education Sessions to Sharing Sessions. A Heckman Selectivity analyses will be used to determine if there are differences between those who complete the full intervention and those who complete only baseline measures or Community Educational Sessions. Due to the nature of the study, there may also be attrition due to death. If there are differences in attrition, the inverse Mill's ratio will be used in all further analyses. Comparison of baseline measures from pre-registration interviews will serve to ensure that there are no significant differences between the cohorts.

After these preliminary analyses, change in Cohort 1's ACP measures can be compared to changes from baseline to the waitlist pretest measures from Cohort 2. Since Cohort 2 received no intervention in the first 6 months, the analysis will control for natural variations over time and any measures which show significantly larger change in Cohort 1 can be attributed to the intervention. Cohorts 1 and 2 can then be combined to examine intervention effects (i.e., change from pretest to posttest) in the full sample of participants who experienced the Sharing Sessions; baseline results for Cohort 1 will be combined with waitlist pretest results for Cohort 2 and compared to the combined group of 70 Sharing Sessions' posttests. Finally, the combined cohorts will be compared to a subsample of matched participants who experienced the Community Education Sessions only to determine how each step in MY WAY affects the outcome ACP measures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Advance Care Planning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Advance Care Planning Experimental

Community Information Session on advance care planning and private one-on-one Sharing Session about advance care planning.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Advance Care Planning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Community Information Session and Private Sharing Session with trained social worker

Advance Care Planning Waitlist

Waitlist Group- Baseline control measures will be collected at consent and again 3-6 months later before attending a Community Information Session on advance care planning and an one-on-one Sharing Session about Advance Care Planning. Data will be collected again 8 weeks after the intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Advance Care Planning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Community Information Session and Private Sharing Session with trained social worker

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Advance Care Planning

Community Information Session and Private Sharing Session with trained social worker

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged ≥18 years
* either enrolled member or spouse of enrolled member in tribal service area
* Member of another American Indian/Alaskan Native tribe
* English fluency
* Resides in the tribal service area.

Exclusion Criteria

• Cognitively impaired
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Western Carolina University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elizabeth Anderson

Assistant Professor of Social Work

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

R T Goins, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western Carolina University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Western Carolina University

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schweinhart A, Goins RT, Anderson E. Results of a Culturally Tailored Advance Care Planning Intervention for American Indian Peoples: A Quasi-Experimental Waitlist-Controlled Trial. Innov Aging. 2025 May 6;9(6):igaf041. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf041. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40520470 (View on PubMed)

Anderson E, Goins RT, Haozous EA, Schweinhart A. Testing a Culturally Tailored Advance Care Planning Intervention (MY WAY) for an American Indian Tribe: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Waitlist Control Design. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Dec 29;12:e50654. doi: 10.2196/50654.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38157237 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21NR019910-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1685879-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caregiving During Crisis
NCT04939714 COMPLETED NA
2025 Mental Health Education Tool
NCT07227090 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Preventing Suicide in African American Adolescents
NCT04253002 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA