Safety and Efficiency of the PacePress to Prevent Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients Undergoing CIED Implantation.

NCT ID: NCT05292326

Last Updated: 2025-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-25

Study Completion Date

2025-03-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PacePress medical device, by ensuring constant compression force and the ability to optimize it in the pocket area prevents/significantly reduces the risk of hemorrhagic complications, including but not limited to the operation pocket hematoma. By avoiding a strong localized compression and ensuring "covering compression" achieved by the appropriate distribution of compression forces on the entire implantation site area, with an automated compression force control, the risk of a pressure sore created in the compressed pocket area is reduced.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be an open-label, multi-center, monitored randomized study with 235 subjects qualified for:

* the CIED implantation procedure (initial),
* the CIED replacement procedure (ICD, CRT),
* expantion of the system,
* revision of electrodes.

The study consists in randomization of patients who meet all the inclusion criteria and do not meet any of the exclusion criteria, after performing the above procedure for the group (A): the PacePress medical device will be used, or (B): a standard of care will be used, in order to compare the safety and efficacy of the PacePress in relation to the standard of care, in preventing hemorrhagic complications and site infections.

Data regarding the assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the PacePress medical device are collected on the day of the procedure and during the 30-day patient observation.

In PacePress clinical trial, the standard pharmacotherapeutic procedures in the facility are not modified or affected (including but not limited to the anti-coagulation and antiplatelet treatment) according to the guidelines and standard procedure ESC and PTK in patients included in the study.

The investigational medical device is the PacePress (Medinice S.A.). This is an electronically-controlled self-pressure dressing that, , thanks to a well-selected compression force, may contribute significantly to preventing hemorrhagic complications following electrotherapy procedures, including increasing the safety of CIED implantation procedures and accelerating wound healing significantly.

The planned number of patients included in the study is 235 patients aged above 18 years. The study subjects will be divided into groups at random (4:1):

GROUP A - Following the procedure, the patients will be dressed in the PacePress - investigational medical device instead of a standard compression device.

The planned number of group members: n= 188 people.

GROUP B - Following the procedure, the patients will be dressed in the standard compression device.

The planned number of group members: n= 47 people.

In the study, the assumptions were made concerning the gradation and frequency of hematoma occurrence in particular groups and randomization of patients (4:1). Assuming the first-type error α=0.025 for the one-sided hypothesis and the test power of 0.8, 194 patients should be included in the study. Due to the planned interim analysis, which will be performed after half of the patients have been included in the study, and assuming the drop-out rate of 8 %, the required sample size should be increased to 235 patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemorrhagic Complications Hematoma Hemorrhage Pathologic Processes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PacePress

the patients will be dressed with PacePress medical device instead of a standard compression device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PacePress

Intervention Type DEVICE

an electronically-controlled compression site which, thanks to a well-selected compression force, may contribute significantly to preventing hemorrhagic complications following electrotherapy procedures, including to increasing safety of CIED implantation procedures and accelerate wound healing significantly

standard compression band/tourniquet

standard treatment with respect to preventing hemorrhagic complications and implantation site inflammation, the patients will be dressed with a standard compression device/sand bag

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard compression band

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard used compression band/sand bag

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PacePress

an electronically-controlled compression site which, thanks to a well-selected compression force, may contribute significantly to preventing hemorrhagic complications following electrotherapy procedures, including to increasing safety of CIED implantation procedures and accelerate wound healing significantly

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard compression band

standard used compression band/sand bag

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18 years.
2. The patient qualified for:

* the CIED implantation procedure (initial),
* the CIED replacement procedure (ICD, CRT),
* expansion of the system,
* revision of electrodes.
3. The patient standing high bleeding risk defined as a result of PACE DRAP ≥5.
4. The patient taking anti-coagulation or anti-platelet drugs or anti-coagulation and anti-platelet drugs permanently.

Exclusion Criteria

1. The absence of written consent to participate in the study.
2. A female patient who is pregnant or breast-feeds.
3. The interview reveals addiction to alcohol, drugs, and other psychoactive substances.
4. The anamnesis reveals known hemorrhagic diathesis or thrombocytopenia, particularly after heparin is administered.
5. Active infection of the implantation site.
6. Active infection 4 weeks before inclusion in the study.
7. Anomaly in the chest near the device site.
8. The patient participates in another clinical trial.
9. Anticipated life span \< 6 months.
10. Diagnosed allergy to any device ingredient.
11. The patient undergoes active biological therapy.
12. Treated cancer.
13. The patient undergoes shoulder girdle physiotherapy.
14. The patient undergoes systemic steroid therapy (intravenous therapy).
15. Obesity preventing the application of PacePress device.

Criteria excluding the patient from the study that may appear during or immediately after the procedure:
16. Cardiac arrest (CPR)
17. Perforation.
18. Pneumothorax.
19. Intubation (patient intubated after the procedure).
20. Change of pacemaker position (conversion to the right side).
21. Procedure completed without implantation of the intended system.
22. Need for invasive treatment of complications of the procedure.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medinice S.A.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Przemysław Mitkowski, Prof. MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University in Poznań

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

I Cardiology Clinic, Medical University in Poznań

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Wolski Hospital, Cardiology Ward

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Cardiology Clinic, Medical University of Warsaw

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Clinical Department of Cardiology, the National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

I Clinic for Cardiac Arrhythmias National Institute of Cardiology Stefan Cardinal Wyszyński National Research Institute

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Department of Cardiology / 1st Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases

Zabrze, , Poland

Site Status

Electrocardiology Clinic, Medical University

Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PacePress_2020_03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Memory Gel and Shape Combined Cohort
NCT02919592 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
LiDCO Monitor Study
NCT01567371 COMPLETED NA
LymphoPilot Test for Limb Lymphedema
NCT04858230 TERMINATED NA
Human Research Program Flight Thigh Cuff
NCT06476106 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA