Imaging Treat-to-target Strategy vs Conventional Treat-to-target Strategy in Psoriatic Arthritis
NCT ID: NCT05291819
Last Updated: 2024-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
202 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-14
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Main inclusion criteria are: \>18 years of age, Clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Fulfillment of ClASsification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, Indication for treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs according to treating physician
Primary endpoint: Sustained remission, defined as Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) at 16, 20 and 24 months
Secondary endpoints: Individual and composite disease activity measures and remission criteria, inflammation assessed by ultrasound, health related quality of life and adverse events.
Study design: A two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, treatment strategy study where patients are randomized 1:1 to a conventional treat-to-target follow-up strategy with structured clinical assessment of disease activity or an imaging informed treat-to-target follow-up strategy with both structured clinical assessment of disease activity and structured imaging assessment of disease activity. Duration of follow-up is 24 months.
All patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the sole target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤3), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3%
Intervention: A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information. Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target:
* If evidence of enthesitis or axial inflammation on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm
* If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler\>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Treatment With Tofacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis in Routine Clinical Practice
NCT04517669
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tildrakizumab in Psoriasis Patients
NCT05683015
To Observe the Impacts of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Effectiveness on Improvement in Work Place and Household Productivity for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
NCT02028169
Study Evaluating the Cost of the Treatments of the Refractory Psoriatic Arthritis to the Conventional Therapy
NCT00303186
Efficacy And Safety Of Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparator Study
NCT01877668
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main objective is to assess if a treat-to-target strategy implementing structured imaging assessments leads to better patient outcome in terms of sustained remission compared to a conventional treat-to-target strategy in psoriatic arthritis.
Primary endpoint: Sustained remission, defined as Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) at all of the 16, 20 and 24 month visits.
Secondary endpoints include Individual and composite disease activity measures and remission criteria, inflammation assessed by ultrasound, health related quality of life and adverse events.
Study design: A two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, treatment strategy study where patients are randomized 1:1 to a conventional treat-to-target follow-up strategy with structured clinical assessment of disease activity or an imaging informed treat-to-target follow-up strategy with both structured clinical assessment of disease activity and structured imaging assessment of disease activity. Duration of follow-up is 24 months.
All patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the sole target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤3), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3%
Intervention: A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information. Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target:
If evidence of enthesitis or axial inflammation on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler\>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional treat-to-target
Conventional treat-to-target follow-up strategy with structured clinical assessment of disease activity
Conventional treat-to-target
Patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤4), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3%
Imaging informed treat-to-target
Imaging informed treat-to-target follow-up strategy with both structured clinical assessment of disease activity and structured imaging assessment of disease activity.
Imaging informed treat-to-target
A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information
Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target:
* If evidence of enthesitis (power Doppler\>0 in enthesis) or axial inflammation (SPARCC score ≥ 2\* in SI-joint or SPARCC score ≥ 5 in presence of clinical symptoms of axial disease) on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm
* If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler\>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Imaging informed treat-to-target
A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information
Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target:
* If evidence of enthesitis (power Doppler\>0 in enthesis) or axial inflammation (SPARCC score ≥ 2\* in SI-joint or SPARCC score ≥ 5 in presence of clinical symptoms of axial disease) on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm
* If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler\>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target
Conventional treat-to-target
Patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤4), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3%
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinical diagnosis of PsA
3. Indication for treatment with DMARDs according to treating physician (including having attempted ≥2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for a minimum of 4 weeks in total in predominantly axial and/or entheseal disease)
4. Fulfillment of CASPAR criteria for PsA
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous DMARD treatment for PsA
3. Systemic glucocorticoid use within the last 3 months
4. Local glucocorticoid injections within the last 4 weeks
5. Major co-morbidities, including but not limited to relevant malignancies, severe diabetes mellitus, severe infections, uncontrolled hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA class III or IV) and/or severe respiratory diseases and cirrhosis.
6. Indications of active or latent tuberculosis (TB) as assessed by chest radiograph and TB interferon gamma release assay (IGRA). Patients with documented adequately treated latent TB can be included.
7. Any other medical condition that according to the treated physician and/or local guidelines makes adherence to treatment protocol impossible
8. Abnormal renal function, defined as serum creatinine \>142 µmol/L in female and \>168 µmol/L in male, or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<40 mL/min/1.73 m2
9. Abnormal liver function (defined as Aspartate Transaminase (AST) and/or Alanine Transaminase (ALT) \>1.5 x upper normal limit), active or recent hepatitis
10. Significant anemia, leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia
11. Inadequate birth control, pregnancy, and/or breastfeeding (current at screening or planned within the duration of the study)
12. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging
13. Severe psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse or other substance abuse, language barriers or other factors which makes adherence to the study protocol impossible
14. Established or suspected widespread-pain syndrome/fibromyalgia
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Siri Lillegraven
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Siri Lillegraven, MD, MPH, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Diakonhjemmet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Rheumatology, Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
Ålesund, , Norway
Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Bergen HF
Bergen, , Norway
Department of Rheumatology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken HF
Drammen, , Norway
Helse Førde
Førde, , Norway
Haugesunds Sanitetsforening Revmatismesykehus
Haugesund, , Norway
Sørlandet Sykehus
Kristiansand, , Norway
Revmatismesykehuset AS
Lillehammer, , Norway
Helgelandssykehuset, Mo i Rana
Mo i Rana, , Norway
Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Martina Hansens Hospital AS
Sandvika, , Norway
University Hospital of Northern Norway
Tromsø, , Norway
Department of Rheumatology, St Olavs Hospital HF
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Maud-Kristine Aga Ljoså, MD
Role: primary
Bjørg-Tilde Fevang, MD PhD
Role: primary
Ada S. Wierød, MD
Role: primary
Anja Myhre Hjelle, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Mathias M Braaten, MD
Role: primary
Jintana B Andersen, MD PhD
Role: primary
Inger M Hansen, MD
Role: primary
Annicken Slagsvold, MD
Role: primary
Gunnstein Bakland, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Agnete Malm Gulati, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NOR-SPRINT protocol ver4_1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.