The Effect of Different Intra-articular Injections Primary Gonarthrosis

NCT ID: NCT05291793

Last Updated: 2022-03-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gonarthrosis is a frequent cause of knee pain and mostly related to altered function of the knee. Intra-articular injections are a valuable noninvasive medical treatment of choice for pain management and functional enhancement. This study aims to investigate the effects of intra-articular injections without local anesthesics which are well known to be chondrotoxic. For this purpose, functional data of the patients who received intra-articular injections have been collected and analyzed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intra-articular knee injections are commonly used treatment method. It is preferred to relieve the pain and functional limitation due to knee osteoarthritis. Studies have shown the benefit of intra-articular injections, including intra-articular sterile saline injection alone. In addition, studies have shown chondrotoxic effects of local anesthetics and corticosteroids such as triamcinolone. Local anesthetics are often added to the injection in intra-knee injections. Many previous studies stated that anesthetic agents were mixed with corticosteroid and NSAID intra-articular injections but not in this study. This creates confusion on which preparation is effective on pain and function. The aim of this study is to compare pain-reducing and function-improving effects of intra-articular injection with corticosteroids or NSAIDs, while avoiding local anesthetics whose chondrotoxic effects have been confirmed. In order to reveal the unmasked effect, an intra-articular saline injection group was introduced as a sham treatment. Thus, a study with a level of evidence 1 will make a significant contribution to the literature.

Patients who applied to the outpatient clinic and who were diagnosed with primary gonarthrosis by clinical and radiographic examinations have been randomized to four different groups by closed-envelope method following taking the informed consent. Accordingly, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAI) drugs have been prescribed to all diagnosed patients. Demographic data of the patients have been noted and randomized into four equal groups of thirty individuals each. Afterwards, the first group received NSAID treatment, the second group received intra-articular methylprednisolone, the third group received intraarticular tenoxicam, and the fourth group received intra-articular sterile saline injection. All eligible patients have been given one random envelope by the secretary, then proceeded to the injection room with envelopes closed. The orthopedic technician prepared the injection depending on the information inside the envelope then the syringe is covered with opaque plaster or foil. Then, an injection was applied by the physician blindly. The patients' visual analog score(VAS) pain form and WOMAC scores are collected in each follow-up. Following the data has been obtained by an independent data recorder, all data have been saved to the database and statistical results were analyzed. According to the posthoc power analysis, the number of patients can be revised for statistical power.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gonarthrosis; Primary

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Identical work scheme applied in 4 different centers by 4 Physicians. Both patient selection, randomization, and blind injection applications have been implemented in same order.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
patients were not aware of the ingredient of the injection they had received Care providers were not aware of the ingredient of injection during application

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NSAID group

Group 1, patients only received non-steroid anti-inflammatory oral and topical treatment for 3 weeks. (ibuprofen 2x800 mg (1600 mg daily), 1% nimesulide + 5%Lidocain (3 times a day))

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Tenoxicam

Group 2, patients received intraarticular tenoxicam ( 20 mg) once.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tenoxicam 20 Mg Powder for Solution for Injection Vial

Intervention Type DRUG

Tenoxicam 20 Mg Powder is mixed with dissolving solvent then administered intraarticularly

Methylprednisolone

Group 3, patients received intraarticular methylprednisolone once(40mg).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Methylprednisolone

Intervention Type DRUG

Methylprednisolone 40 Mg (suspension) administered intraarticularly

Saline

Group 4, patients received an intraarticular sterile saline injection(4ml).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

2ml sterile saline administered intraarticularly

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tenoxicam 20 Mg Powder for Solution for Injection Vial

Tenoxicam 20 Mg Powder is mixed with dissolving solvent then administered intraarticularly

Intervention Type DRUG

Methylprednisolone

Methylprednisolone 40 Mg (suspension) administered intraarticularly

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

2ml sterile saline administered intraarticularly

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years old
* Diagnosed as Osteoarthritis ( in weight-bearing standing Antero-Posterior and Lateral knee plain radiographs)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients refuse to enroll in the study voluntarily
* Patients refuse to give informed consent
* Patients who have received physiotherapy and/or intraarticular injection in the last 6 months.
* Patients who have used supporting brace treatment in the last 6 months
* Patients did not attend routine follow-up visits.
* Patients experienced any allergic reaction to the administered drug
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yiğit Umur Cırdı

Medical Doctor, Orthopedics and Traumatolgy Specialist, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Acıbadem Kozyatağı Hospital

Istanbul, Kozyatağı, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kartal Lutfi Kırdar State Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Nevşehir State Hospital

Nevşehir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jevsevar DS, Shores PB, Mullen K, Schulte DM, Brown GA, Cummins DS. Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Nonsurgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 May 1;26(9):325-336. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00318.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29688920 (View on PubMed)

Jayaram P, Kennedy DJ, Yeh P, Dragoo J. Chondrotoxic Effects of Local Anesthetics on Human Knee Articular Cartilage: A Systematic Review. PM R. 2019 Apr;11(4):379-400. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12007. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30676699 (View on PubMed)

Busse P, Vater C, Stiehler M, Nowotny J, Kasten P, Bretschneider H, Goodman SB, Gelinsky M, Zwingenberger S. Cytotoxicity of drugs injected into joints in orthopaedics. Bone Joint Res. 2019 Mar 2;8(2):41-48. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0099.R1. eCollection 2019 Feb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30915209 (View on PubMed)

Bellamy JL, Goff BJ, Sayeed SA. Economic Impact of Ketorolac vs Corticosteroid Intra-Articular Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27402605 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2100027722

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.