Impact of Therapeutic Intervention on Quality of Life in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
NCT ID: NCT05271773
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
234 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-11-18
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Longitudinal, prospective, multi-center cohort study to measure the impact that the therapeutic attitude (treatment intensification/de-intensification o escalation/de-escalation) has on the quality of life of patients with UC given a colonoscopy revealing mucosal healing (Mayo 0, Mayo 1); considering as treatment intensification/de-intensification a dose increase or decrease on the same line of treatment, and escalation/de-escalation if there is a change to a new line of treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Quality of Life in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease
NCT00061737
Comparing the Quality of Life of Terminal Ileitis Patients With Crohn's Disease Treated With Anti-TNF or Surgical Resection
NCT02872506
Quality of Life for Patients With Chronic Paediatric Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
NCT04881370
Monitoring of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: the Experience of the Reference Center of the Emilia-Romagna
NCT06721767
Fecal Calprotectin Levels, Quality of Life, and Workability in Patients Suffering From Ulcerative Colitis Under Adalimumab Therapy - AdaProQuo
NCT02092389
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
From previous studies the investigators know that patients with a Mayo 1 endoscopic score are at a much greater risk for developing a disease outbreak, thus requiring a treatment escalation more frequently than those Mayo 0 patients. Then, it is needed a study of real clinical practice to evaluate the efficacy of this therapeutic intervention (same treatment or escalation/de-escalation strategy) in patients' quality of life.
Objectives:
Primary:
\- After 6 and 12 months, to measure the impact that the therapeutic attitude (treatment intensification/de-intensification o escalation/de-escalation) has on the quality of life of patients with UC given a colonoscopy revealing mucosal healing (Mayo 0, Mayo 1); considering as treatment intensification/de-intensification a dose increase or decrease on the same line of treatment, and escalation/de-escalation if there is a change to a new line of treatment.
Secondary:
* To evaluate the impact of inflammatory markers at the end of 6 and 12 months (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin).
* Outbreak risk assessment depending on the intervention developed (same treatment, or escalation/de-escalation).
Study design: Longitudinal, prospective, multi-center cohort study. Target population. Patients with an established diagnosis of UC through regular criteria (clinical, analytical, endoscopic, radiological, and/or histological ones), in clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2) for at least three months, who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy after 12 months from the study outset, with a Mayo 0 or Mayo 1 endoscopic activity.
The coverage of the data collections shall extend to all centers via the REDCap platform. The basal characteristics studied are date of birth and gender, and data associated with characteristics of UC such as date of diagnosis, the extent of the area affected, and ongoing treatment when the assessment is performed (5-ASA, immunomodulatory, and/or biologics).
A short 9-item version of the IBD Questionnaire together with an IBD-Control one will be used to register changes across the treatment course at the moment of inclusion (basal), for a maximum period of 2 weeks after colonoscopy. CRP and fecal calprotectin values (both analyzed by each center considering quantitative data) shall be calculated in proportion to the period from 2 weeks prior and 2 weeks after colonoscopy (preventing from collecting feces samples during colonoscopy preparation).
Physicians will schedule follow-up appointments to obtain both an IBDQ-9 and an IBD-Control questionnaire and to monitor CRP and fecal calprotectin values as well as changes in treatment at that moment; to identify the appearance in that period of any clinical outbreak (defined as the presence of rectal bleeding together with any of these: need of any remission-induction therapy -including topical treatment-, any treatment escalation -increasing dose levels, topical medication included, or any change in treatment- and requiring hospitalization or colectomy).
Sample size planning: At the 95% confidence level and a power of 80%, with a one-sided hypothesis:
* To demonstrate a difference in recurrence with no treatment changes, by assuming a recurrence of 36.6% from the Mayo 1 group, and of 9.4% from Mayo 0 group (8), the investigators need 28 patients in each group.
* To demonstrate that due to increased treatment, Mayo 0 group does not get better and Mayo 1 group will show a 25% of improvement compared to the no changes-in-treatment plan, a sample of 57 patients per group is needed.
* To demonstrate that treatment reduction increases recurrence up to 10% in Mayo 0 group of patients and to 40% in Mayo 1 group compared to the no changes-in-treatment plan, a sample of 14 patients per group is needed.
Statistical methods. An electronic anonymized database will save the codified data obtained. Demographic and clinical variables will be characterized by descriptive statistics parameters. Quantitative variables will be measured by medians and interquartile ranges or means and standard deviation. Qualitative variables will take into account absolute and relative frequencies (%), and 95% confidence interval. Statistical tests will be performed using STATA 15 and IBM SPSS Statistics 25 statistical software packages.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mayo 0
Patients with an established diagnosis of UC through regular criteria (clinical, analytical, endoscopic, radiological and/or histological ones), in clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2) for at least three months, who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy after 12 months from the study outset, with a Mayo 0 endoscopic activity.
No interventions assigned to this group
Mayo 1
Patients with an established diagnosis of UC through regular criteria (clinical, analytical, endoscopic, radiological and/or histological ones), in clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤2) for at least three months, who had undergone surveillance colonoscopy after 12 months from the study outset, with a Mayo 1 endoscopic activity.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18.
* Signed and dated informed consent form.
* Have undergone a Mayo 0 or 1 endoscopic score colonoscopy while in clinical remission.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous bowel resection.
* Ostomy patient.
* Active infection.
* Pregnancy.
* Lack of patient's informed consent.
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grupo Espanol de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GETECCU GETECCU
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí
Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain
Hospital de Santa Bárbara de Puertollano
Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Cáceres
Cáceres, Extremadura, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Princesa
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario. Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAVI_CU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.