ADAPT Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention (TAVI & Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO PCI)

NCT ID: NCT05259241

Last Updated: 2022-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-20

Study Completion Date

2023-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: The choice of antithrombotic regimen during TAVI and CTO PCI includes the use of unfractionated heparin. The accuracy of ACT in this setting is disputed. ACT has never been compared to a point-of-care aPTT test for monitoring anticoagulation during percutaneous cardiac interventions.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status in patients, defined with the anti-Xa measurement.

Study design: A Single-center, prospective, observational study Study population: patients undergoing TAVI (Cohort A) or CTO PCI (Cohort B) in the Erasmus University Medical Center

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoints are the correlation between the ACT and APTT point-of-care- tests and the coagulation status, defined as the laboratory anti-Xa measurement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The choice of antithrombotic regimen during TAVI and CTO PCI includes the use of unfractionated heparin. Heparin is the preferred anticoagulant drug in these percutaneous cardiac interventions aiming for an Activated Clotting Time (ACT) \> 200sec or 250seconds depending on the procedure. Heparin has a short half-life time and can be neutralized by protamine.

Monitoring the use of unfractionated heparin during TAVI and PCI can be performed with several measurements, like the ACT and aPTT. To measure ACT, an activator is mixed with whole blood to provide a timing of haemostasis. aPTT is a plasma test in which a surface activator is used to measure the time it takes to form a fibrin clot. In nearly every center ACT is the preferred method because of its ease of use and the assumed reliability. ACT-guided heparin regime during TAVI seems effective in minimizing major bleeding events.

There are limited studies focussing on the difference between ACT- and aPTT measurements. The studies which investigated this difference are merely done in patients with continuous heparin infusions, for example in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO). These studies suggest that there is a better correlation between aPTT and dosage heparin than between ACT and heparin. Also, the correlation between ACT and aPTT seems poor.

The accuracy and correlation of ACT with a point-of-care aPTT test for monitoring the anticoagulation effect of unfractionated heparin has so far not been done in the setting of percutaneous interventions. TAVI requires large bore arterial access and is associated with a relevant frequency of access site related bleeding and vascular complications. CTO procedures often require dual arterial access and the use of different strategies with multiple wires which increases the prevalence of vascular complications, including pericardial effusion.

Precise knowledge of actual anticoagulation status during an invasive procedure and at the time of access site closure may affect the incidence of TAVI and CTO PCI related bleeding complications.

Therefore, the aim of the present study is to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status in patients during TAVI and CTO PCI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Single-center, prospective, observational study
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single arm study

Cohort A: patients undergoing TAVR to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status

Cohort B: patients undergoing PCI to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status

Group Type OTHER

activated partial thrombin time

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

This study aims to find which the point-of-care test (ACT or APTT) has the best correlation with the coagulation status during transcatheter cardiac interventions (either TAVR or PCI)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

activated partial thrombin time

This study aims to find which the point-of-care test (ACT or APTT) has the best correlation with the coagulation status during transcatheter cardiac interventions (either TAVR or PCI)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

activated clotting time

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients undergoing a TAVI-procedure
* All patients undergoing a CTO PCI procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Roche Diagnostics GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolas van Mieghem

Clinical director of Interventional cardiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasmus University Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nicolas Van Mieghem, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31 10 703 52 60

Thijmen Hokken, MD

Role: CONTACT

+31107038896

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC-2020-0375

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rivaroxaban for Slow Coronary Flow After PCI in STEMI
NCT07195812 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4
Resistance STEMI Study
NCT03439150 TERMINATED NA
Occluded Artery Trial (OAT)
NCT00004562 COMPLETED PHASE3