ADAPT Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention (TAVI & Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO PCI)
NCT ID: NCT05259241
Last Updated: 2022-07-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-20
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status in patients, defined with the anti-Xa measurement.
Study design: A Single-center, prospective, observational study Study population: patients undergoing TAVI (Cohort A) or CTO PCI (Cohort B) in the Erasmus University Medical Center
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study endpoints are the correlation between the ACT and APTT point-of-care- tests and the coagulation status, defined as the laboratory anti-Xa measurement.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Lesion Platelet Adhesion as Selective Target of Endovenous Revacept
NCT03312855
Study Evaluating How Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Are Managed During 2 Years After Discharge
NCT01171404
Direct Complete Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Multivessel Disease
NCT03621501
Long Term Clinical Efficacy of Thrombectomy Devices in Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT00766740
Coagulation Profile in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT05336669
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Monitoring the use of unfractionated heparin during TAVI and PCI can be performed with several measurements, like the ACT and aPTT. To measure ACT, an activator is mixed with whole blood to provide a timing of haemostasis. aPTT is a plasma test in which a surface activator is used to measure the time it takes to form a fibrin clot. In nearly every center ACT is the preferred method because of its ease of use and the assumed reliability. ACT-guided heparin regime during TAVI seems effective in minimizing major bleeding events.
There are limited studies focussing on the difference between ACT- and aPTT measurements. The studies which investigated this difference are merely done in patients with continuous heparin infusions, for example in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO). These studies suggest that there is a better correlation between aPTT and dosage heparin than between ACT and heparin. Also, the correlation between ACT and aPTT seems poor.
The accuracy and correlation of ACT with a point-of-care aPTT test for monitoring the anticoagulation effect of unfractionated heparin has so far not been done in the setting of percutaneous interventions. TAVI requires large bore arterial access and is associated with a relevant frequency of access site related bleeding and vascular complications. CTO procedures often require dual arterial access and the use of different strategies with multiple wires which increases the prevalence of vascular complications, including pericardial effusion.
Precise knowledge of actual anticoagulation status during an invasive procedure and at the time of access site closure may affect the incidence of TAVI and CTO PCI related bleeding complications.
Therefore, the aim of the present study is to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status in patients during TAVI and CTO PCI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single arm study
Cohort A: patients undergoing TAVR to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status
Cohort B: patients undergoing PCI to evaluate which point-of-care test (ACT or aPTT) gives the best correlation with the coagulation status
activated partial thrombin time
This study aims to find which the point-of-care test (ACT or APTT) has the best correlation with the coagulation status during transcatheter cardiac interventions (either TAVR or PCI)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
activated partial thrombin time
This study aims to find which the point-of-care test (ACT or APTT) has the best correlation with the coagulation status during transcatheter cardiac interventions (either TAVR or PCI)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients undergoing a CTO PCI procedure
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Roche Diagnostics GmbH
INDUSTRY
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolas van Mieghem
Clinical director of Interventional cardiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus University Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEC-2020-0375
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.