Pharmacists' Knowledge and Attitudes About ADRs Reporting and Pharmacovigilance Practice in Egyptian Hospitals

NCT ID: NCT05224804

Last Updated: 2022-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-05-01

Study Completion Date

2021-09-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study has assessed the knowledge, attitude and practice of ADRs reporting among pharmacists, and the perceived factors that may influence reporting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The practice and science of pharmacovigilance is described as the gathering, identification, monitoring, assessment, and prevention of adverse medication effects using pharmaceutical products. The term "pharmacovigilance" comes from the Greek words pharmakon (drug) and vigilare (vigilance) (monitor or keep an eye on). Pharmacovigilance (PV) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the science and practices relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or other drug-related problems". PV assesses the risk-benefit profile of medicines in order to improve patient safety. As a result, adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is the bedrock of any PV system, and early detection and reporting of ADRs to regional or national drug-regulatory bodies is important.

ADRs are defined by the World Health Organization as an unpleasant and unexpected response to a medicine that occurs at levels usually employed in man for the prevention, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the alteration of physiological function". Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are major public health issues that have been linked to longer hospital stays and higher therapeutic costs. According to recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational research, the rate of hospital admissions linked to ADRs is between 3-5 percent.

A number of factors have been linked to HCPs, particularly pharmacists, reporting ADRs. Several studies have indicated reasons for not reporting observed ADRs, and pharmacists have been polled to determine the most important facilitators and barriers to spontaneous reporting. The seven deadly sins were coined by Inman and later defined by Lopez-Gonzalez et al., into professional and personal traits, as well as knowledge and attitudes toward reporting. Pharmacists from throughout the world have highlighted a number of barriers to reporting ADRs, including a lack of time, the inability to correlate an adverse event (AE) to a specific medicine, and the absence of readily available reporting forms . It has also emphasized the necessity of educational measures to encourage ADR reporting, such as awareness lectures and workshops.

Egypt joined the WHO International Program for Drug Monitoring in 2001, but no concrete actions were done until 2009, when the Egyptian Pharmacovigilance Center was established (EPVC). Receiving ADR reports, detecting safety signals, sending frequent newsletters with pharmacovigilance (PV)-related updates, and conducting awareness training are only a few of EPVC's responsibilities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adverse Drug Reaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

knwoledge

Knowledge and Attitudes about ADRs Reporting

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Pharmacist graduates

Exclusion Criteria

undergrauate pharmacist

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fayoum University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marwa Kamal

lecturer of clinical pharmacy, phD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Marwa Kamal Ahmed Tolba

Al Fayyum, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Beninger P. Pharmacovigilance: An Overview. Clin Ther. 2018 Dec;40(12):1991-2004. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30126707 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pharmacovigilance

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Pharmacist Impact Study
NCT07269002 COMPLETED NA