Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-15
2024-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Cardiac biomarker levels in African American patients with new onset Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction will be significantly lower than a Caucasian cohort with new onset Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Heart Disease and the Black Health Disadvantage
NCT00005403
Cardiovascular Disease in Black Versus White Physicians
NCT00005234
Identifying Genes That May Increase the Risk for Heart Disease in African Americans
NCT00344136
Epidemiology of Coronary Heart Disease in Blacks
NCT00005410
Clinical Cardiovascular Outcomes of African-Americans
NCT00005429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
African American (AA) patients experience higher incidence of HF relative to the general population and are at an increased risk of mortality secondary to chronic HF compared to Caucasian patients. AA patients are three times more likely to develop HF because AA patients may suffer from a subgroup of left ventricular hypertrophy where biomarkers like N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) are not clinically elevated. The 2021 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) Treatment Guidelines endorse measurement of both BNP and NT-proBNP as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognostication of HF; however, current treatment guidelines have not established treatment thresholds for either BNP or NT-proBNP.7 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cutoff BNP value for the diagnosis of HF is 100 pg/mL. For NT-proBNP, the optimal cutoff values for confirmatory decision limits for HF are 450, 900, and 1,800 pg/mL for ages less than 50 years, between 50 to 75 years, and older than 75 years of age, respectively.3 In clinical practice, significant heterogeneity surrounds treatment cutoffs for NT-proBNP levels for treatment of HF, as seen in many recent prominent landmark HF pharmacotherapy trials.
Within the general population, serum NP levels, especially NT-proBNP, are significantly lower in the AA population compared to Caucasians as seen in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke, Dallas Heart, and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities studies. After accounting for traditional risk factors, racial differences in body composition, cardiac structure, and socioeconomic factors, AA patients were found to have significantly lower serum NT-proBNP levels and greater levels of markers of myocardial stress and inflammation, including high-sensitivity Troponin T (hsTnT), GDF-15, and ST2. This finding may also be due to genetic differences, as percent European ancestry (PEA) in AA patients was found to have a direct impact on NT-proBNP levels in the general AA population. Of the 1656 AA patients in whom PEA data were available, a 10% increase in PEA was associated with 7% higher adjusted NT-proBNP levels.
Knowing that the general AA population has lower serum NP's compared to Caucasian patients, limited research focuses on initial NT-proBNP levels in AA patients with new-onset HF. Given that many landmark HF trials primarily enroll Caucasian patients, several questions emerge: (i) should medicine individualize treatment thresholds for NT-proBNP and other cardiac biomarkers based on race given known racial discrepancies with serum NP's and increased mortality seen in these patients? (ii) Is the trend seen in AA patients regarding serum NPs and other cardiac biomarkers still true when these patients present with new-onset HF? Our goal is to review cardiac biomarkers present on admission between AA patients with new onset HF compared to a comparable cohort of Caucasian patients to establish whether there is a clinically significant difference between the two groups regarding cardiac biomarker levels and initial HF severity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
New onset HFrEF AA patients
New onset HFrEF AA patients
No intervention
No intervention
New onset HFrEF Caucasian patients
New onset HFrEF Caucasian patients
No intervention
No intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Self-identified as AA
* Self-identified as Caucasian
* NYHA class II-IV symptoms
* Left ventricle EF \<40%
* First admission for HFrEF
* No echocardiography during initial admission
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Crystal Brown, PharmD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
043.PHA.2021.A
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.