Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2962 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-07
2024-04-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait Phase III Trial in Zambia
NCT04800055
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Artemisinin Combination Therapy in Kenya
NCT01899820
Reducing the Burden of Malaria by Targeting Hotspots of Malaria Transmission
NCT01575613
Evaluation of Long-Lasting Microbial Larvicides in Reducing Malaria Transmission and Clinical Malaria Incidence
NCT02392832
Strengthening the Evidence for Policy on the RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine
NCT05041556
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is a need for interventions that supplement and complement LLINs and IRS by killing mosquitoes outside houses using other biologic mechanisms (e.g., targeting sugar feeding behaviour). Furthermore, insecticides are required with novel modes of action that may restore sensitivity to pyrethroids by killing both pyrethroid-resistant and sensitive mosquitoes. Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB) (the name was recently changed from Attractive Toxic Sugar Bait to highlight that it targets malaria vectors) is a promising new intervention that potentially fills the need for outdoor interventions with novel killing effects.
ATSB 'bait stations' are A4-sized panels containing thickened fruit syrup laced with a neonicotinoid insecticide (dinotefuran) to attract and kill the foraging vectors. Entomological field trials in Mali showed that ATSBs successfully reduce mosquito densities and longevity and thus have the potential to reduce malaria transmission. Large scale efficacy studies are now needed to establish the efficacy of ATSB for controlling malaria transmission.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB)
Clusters within the ATSB arm will have 2 ATSBs hung on all eligible structures in the cluster where consent from the corresponding compound has been given.
Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB)
An ATSB is a A4-sized panel containing thickened fruit syrup laced with a neonicotinoid insecticide, dinotefuran. The syrup-insecticide mixture is covered with a protective membrane that allows mosquitoes to feed through the membrane while preventing non-target organisms from feeding. This device is designed to attract and kill mosquitoes.
Control
Clusters within the control arm will not receive ATSBs.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait (ATSB)
An ATSB is a A4-sized panel containing thickened fruit syrup laced with a neonicotinoid insecticide, dinotefuran. The syrup-insecticide mixture is covered with a protective membrane that allows mosquitoes to feed through the membrane while preventing non-target organisms from feeding. This device is designed to attract and kill mosquitoes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A minimum of 200 households
* A resident of a household within the core area of a study cluster, defined as living in the household in the recent four months and planning to live in the same household for the next 6.5 months
* Aged ≥ 1 year and \< 15 years at the time of enrollment
* Written informed consent and/or assent
--Households located within one of the 40 clusters (core or buffer area) randomly allocated to the trial intervention arm with a least one permanent resident
* Household located within the core area of the cluster
* Head of household or his/her representative is at least 18 years of age
* Written informed consent for the collection of entomological data by the head of household or representative
* Men aged 18 to 49 years
* Willingness and ability to work late at night for up to 7 hours at a time
* Willingness to take and tolerate a treatment regimen of the appropriate Kenya Ministry of Health (MoH) recommended antimalarial and chemoprophylaxis with 250 mg of mefloquine weekly to prevent malaria starting two weeks before the start of and until four weeks after completing HLCs
* Written informed consent
* A resident of a household within an intervention area defined as an ATSB area during the main trial or an ASB area during any preliminary studies
* Resides in a household at the time of ASB/ATSB deployment, where the ASB/ATSB was installed for at least one month.
* 18 years of age or older if participating in focus group discussions; 15 years of age or older if participating in in-depth interviews
* Serving as an ATSB monitoring assistant with experience installing ATSBs and monitoring the deployment Eighteen years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal to participate by village elders
* A confirmed or suspected pregnancy. Pregnant women are excluded because they are eligible for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp).
* Taking daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (because this has antimalarial effects)
* Known sickle cell disease (because they received antimalarial prophylaxis)
* Contraindication to artemether-lumefantrine, the medication used for parasite clearance
* Refusal of consent by the head-of-household to deploy ATSB on the outer walls (intervention villages only)
* Vacated compounds
* Refusal/inability to work late at night for up to 7 hours at a time
* Unwillingness to take or intolerance/allergy to appropriate MoH treatment regimen or chemoprophylaxis
--Unable to provide consent
* Less than one month experience (i.e. is new to the job)
* Unable to provide consent
1 Year
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kenya Medical Research Institute
OTHER
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
PATH
OTHER
Kenya Ministry of Health
OTHER_GOV
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aaron Samuels, MD, MHS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Eric Ochomo
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kenya Medical Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Naya Health Centre
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Benga Dispensary
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Boro Dispensary
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Manyuanda Health Centre
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Nyadhi Dispensary
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Ong'ielo Model Health Centre
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Rabar Dispensary
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Rageng'ni Dispensary
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Rambugu Dispensary
Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Huho B, Briet O, Seyoum A, Sikaala C, Bayoh N, Gimnig J, Okumu F, Diallo D, Abdulla S, Smith T, Killeen G. Consistently high estimates for the proportion of human exposure to malaria vector populations occurring indoors in rural Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):235-47. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys214. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
Amek N, Bayoh N, Hamel M, Lindblade KA, Gimnig JE, Odhiambo F, Laserson KF, Slutsker L, Smith T, Vounatsou P. Spatial and temporal dynamics of malaria transmission in rural Western Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2012 Apr 28;5:86. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-86.
Moiroux N, Damien GB, Egrot M, Djenontin A, Chandre F, Corbel V, Killeen GF, Pennetier C. Human exposure to early morning Anopheles funestus biting behavior and personal protection provided by long-lasting insecticidal nets. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104967. eCollection 2014.
Sougoufara S, Diedhiou SM, Doucoure S, Diagne N, Sembene PM, Harry M, Trape JF, Sokhna C, Ndiath MO. Biting by Anopheles funestus in broad daylight after use of long-lasting insecticidal nets: a new challenge to malaria elimination. Malar J. 2014 Mar 28;13:125. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-125.
Killeen GF. Characterizing, controlling and eliminating residual malaria transmission. Malar J. 2014 Aug 23;13:330. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-330.
Killeen GF, Marshall JM, Kiware SS, South AB, Tusting LS, Chaki PP, Govella NJ. Measuring, manipulating and exploiting behaviours of adult mosquitoes to optimise malaria vector control impact. BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 26;2(2):e000212. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000212. eCollection 2017.
Zhu L, Muller GC, Marshall JM, Arheart KL, Qualls WA, Hlaing WM, Schlein Y, Traore SF, Doumbia S, Beier JC. Is outdoor vector control needed for malaria elimination? An individual-based modelling study. Malar J. 2017 Jul 3;16(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1920-y.
Traore MM, Junnila A, Traore SF, Doumbia S, Revay EE, Kravchenko VD, Schlein Y, Arheart KL, Gergely P, Xue RD, Hausmann A, Beck R, Prozorov A, Diarra RA, Kone AS, Majambere S, Bradley J, Vontas J, Beier JC, Muller GC. Large-scale field trial of attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) for the control of malaria vector mosquitoes in Mali, West Africa. Malar J. 2020 Feb 14;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3132-0.
Beier JC, Muller GC, Gu W, Arheart KL, Schlein Y. Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favoured sugar-source blossoms. Malar J. 2012 Feb 1;11:31. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-31.
Fiorenzano JM, Koehler PG, Xue RD. Attractive Toxic Sugar Bait (ATSB) For Control of Mosquitoes and Its Impact on Non-Target Organisms: A Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 10;14(4):398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040398.
Marshall JM, White MT, Ghani AC, Schlein Y, Muller GC, Beier JC. Quantifying the mosquito's sweet tooth: modelling the effectiveness of attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) for malaria vector control. Malar J. 2013 Aug 23;12:291. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-291.
Pocock SJ. When (not) to stop a clinical trial for benefit. JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2228-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2228. No abstract available.
Protopopoff N, Mosha JF, Lukole E, Charlwood JD, Wright A, Mwalimu CD, Manjurano A, Mosha FW, Kisinza W, Kleinschmidt I, Rowland M. Effectiveness of a long-lasting piperonyl butoxide-treated insecticidal net and indoor residual spray interventions, separately and together, against malaria transmitted by pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes: a cluster, randomised controlled, two-by-two factorial design trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 21;391(10130):1577-1588. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30427-6. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
Gimnig JE, Walker ED, Otieno P, Kosgei J, Olang G, Ombok M, Williamson J, Marwanga D, Abong'o D, Desai M, Kariuki S, Hamel MJ, Lobo NF, Vulule J, Bayoh MN. Incidence of malaria among mosquito collectors conducting human landing catches in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Feb;88(2):301-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0209. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
Ogwang C, Samuels AM, McDermott DP, Kamau A, Lesosky M, Obiet K, Janssen JM, Odongo W, Gimnig JE, Gutman JR, Schultz JS, Towett O, Seda B, Chepkirui M, Muchoki M, Omondi S, Kosgei J, Polo B, Aduwo F, Otieno K, Donnelly MJ, Kariuki S, Ochomo E, Kuile FT, Staedke SG. Attractive targeted sugar baits for malaria control in western Kenya (ATSB-Kenya) - Effect of ATSBs on epidemiologic and entomologic indicators: A Phase III, open-label, cluster-randomised, controlled trial. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 26;5(6):e0004230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004230. eCollection 2025.
Kamau A, Obiet K, Ogwang C, McDermott DP, Lesosky M, Janssen J, Odongo W, Gutman JR, Schultz JS, Nicholas W, Seda B, Chepkirui M, Aduwo F, Towett O, Otieno K, Donnelly MJ, Ochomo E, Kariuki S, Samuels AM, O Ter Kuile F, Staedke SG. Attractive targeted sugar baits for malaria control in western Kenya (ATSB-Kenya): enrolment characteristics of cohort children and households. Malar J. 2024 Dec 30;23(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05234-0.
Attractive Targeted Sugar Bait Phase III Trial Group. Attractive targeted sugar bait phase III trials in Kenya, Mali, and Zambia. Trials. 2022 Aug 9;23(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06555-8.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21-027
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.