Feasibility of Elder Mistreatment VOICES-CI Screening Tool

NCT ID: NCT05216081

Last Updated: 2023-09-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of the VOICES Elder Abuse Intervention among older adults with cognitive impairment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The VOICES Elder Abuse Intervention was developed and refined to promote self-identification and self-disclosure to increase reporting of elder abuse and elder mistreatment at the point-of-care in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. A study (N= 1000) examining the use of VOICES in a busy ED with cognitively intact older adults was completed.

The purpose of this study is to to assess the feasibility (N= 80) of the VOICES screening tool among older adults with cognitive impairment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Elder Abuse Elder Mistreatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Elder adults in emergency department setting with cognitive impairment

Elder mistreatment in an Emergency Department setting with cognitive impairment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) screening tool.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES)

Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) screening tool.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
3. Age 60 or above
4. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score between 14-25
5. Not in police custody
6. Non-full trauma track upon arrival
7. Able to consent and communicate in English
8. Agrees and able to use the iPad

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects who live in nursing homes or other long-term care settings
2. At the discretion of the clinician, patient will be excluded if they cannot safely undergo the studies required for participation
3. Subject refusal to participate
4. Subjects with clear signs of elder mistreatment
5. Severe hearing and vision impairment
6. Presenting with acute intoxication
7. Presenting with active psychotic symptoms
8. Presenting with COVID-19 diagnosis and/or severe COVID-19 symptoms
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fuad Abujarad, PhD,MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Raphael Emergency Department

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01AG060084-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2000023799_a

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rural Dementia Caregiver Project
NCT04428112 COMPLETED NA