Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
254 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Preventing Alzheimer's With Cognitive Training
NCT03848312
Home-Based Assessment for Alzheimer Disease Prevention
NCT00546767
"Safety in Dementia": An Online Caregiver Intervention
NCT05173922
Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00571025
Volunteers Adding Life in Dementia: VALID
NCT01715181
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective 1: To determine the effect of the Home Safety Toolkit intervention on caregiver self-efficacy, caregiver adherence to home safety recommendations, and caregiver strain.
Objective 2: To determine the effect of the Home Safety Toolkit intervention on the frequency of risky behaviors and accidents among care recipients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type living in the community.
Research Design: This study was a single-blinded clinical trial with random assignment of subjects to either the intervention group that receives the Home Safety Toolkit Intervention or the control group which receives customary care.
Methodology: The sample consisted of primary family caregivers of a person with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) receiving care at the Bedford VAMC Dementia Outpatient Clinic, the VA Boston HCS, and the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Center. Subjects were dyads of primary caregivers and persons with a progressive DAT who live in the community, are willing to have home visits for home safety education, and who read and speak English. Inclusion criteria for care recipients were: diagnosis of DAT, score of 24 or less on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), is expected to continue living in the community for the next 6 months, and has the ability to ambulate without help from the caregiver. Inclusion criteria for the primary informal caregiver were: lives in the home with the care-recipient, provides a minimum of 4 hours of care-giving or supervision per day, and has no known cognitive impairment as judged by the primary care provider who refers the subject dyad for study recruitment. Exclusion criteria were: care-recipient MMSE score of 25 or greater; a previous home safety visit; and admission to a long-term care facility. Persons with DAT who are living alone will be excluded because their safety issues are more complex and there is no primary informal caregiver who can make consistent observations about risky behaviors and accidents. Time 1 and Time 2 data collection was conducted at home visits and interim data collection was done biweekly by phone. A total of 108 subject dyads completed the study, randomly assigned to the control group (N-48 dyads) and intervention group (60 dydads). The length of participation for each caregiver-care recipient dyad was 3 months after which the control group was offered the Home Safety Toolkit. Data analysis used Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) to test hypotheses for significant group differences with the following outcome variables: adherence to recommendations; post-intervention caregiver self-efficacy and post-intervention caregiver strain; care-recipient risky behaviors and accidents. Covariates will include: baseline measures of caregiver self-efficacy and caregiver strain, caregiver years of formal education and use of social support resources.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Home Safety Toolkit
Intervention group receives home safety tool-kit with education and self-efficacy materials to promote competence to make home safety modifications.
Home Safety Toolkit
Health literacy-verified booklet and home safety items to promote competence to make home safety modifications.
Conventional Safety Checklist
Comparison group received a conventional home safety checklist
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Home Safety Toolkit
Health literacy-verified booklet and home safety items to promote competence to make home safety modifications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* A previous home safety visit.
* Admission to a long-term care facility. - Persons with DAT who are living alone will be excluded because their safety issues are more complex and there is no primary informal caregiver who can make consistent observations about risky behaviors and accidents.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Medical Center
OTHER
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kathy J Horvath, PhD RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA
Bedford, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Horvath KJ, Trudeau SA, Rudolph JL, Trudeau PA, Duffy ME, Berlowitz D. Clinical trial of a home safety toolkit for Alzheimer's disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;2013:913606. doi: 10.1155/2013/913606. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
Lambe S, Cantwell N, Islam F, Horvath K, Jefferson AL. Perceptions, knowledge, incentives, and barriers of brain donation among African American elders enrolled in an Alzheimer's research program. Gerontologist. 2011 Feb;51(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq063. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NRH 05-056
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.