Trial Outcomes & Findings for Brain and Meditation (BAM) Study (NCT NCT05215314)
NCT ID: NCT05215314
Last Updated: 2025-02-06
Results Overview
PSS is a 10-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 = never to 4 = very often, for a total possible range of scores from 0-40 where higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
Baseline, following week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-up
2025-02-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
mHealth Meditation: Participants will receive access to the 4-week Healthy Minds Program (HMP) Foundations module. The HMP app is a meditation-based smartphone app designed to promote and protect psychological well-being through sustainable skills training. The program is grounded in constituents of psychological well-being identified in empirical literature. HMP provides core content, with instruction administered through a curriculum of guided practices. HMP is based on research on eudaimonic well-being (e.g., environmental mastery, purpose) and brain-based skills that underlie these qualities (e.g., regulation of attention, mental flexibility). The full HMP has guided audio practices that address 4 constituents of well-being: awareness, connection, insight, and purpose. At post-treatment, participants will be given access to additional HMP content to support their continued practice.
|
Waitlist Control
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
100
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
95
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
mHealth Meditation: Participants will receive access to the 4-week Healthy Minds Program (HMP) Foundations module. The HMP app is a meditation-based smartphone app designed to promote and protect psychological well-being through sustainable skills training. The program is grounded in constituents of psychological well-being identified in empirical literature. HMP provides core content, with instruction administered through a curriculum of guided practices. HMP is based on research on eudaimonic well-being (e.g., environmental mastery, purpose) and brain-based skills that underlie these qualities (e.g., regulation of attention, mental flexibility). The full HMP has guided audio practices that address 4 constituents of well-being: awareness, connection, insight, and purpose. At post-treatment, participants will be given access to additional HMP content to support their continued practice.
|
Waitlist Control
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Brain and Meditation (BAM) Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=100 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
Total
n=150 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=5 Participants
|
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=7 Participants
|
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
100 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=7 Participants
|
150 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
PSS is a 10-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 = never to 4 = very often, for a total possible range of scores from 0-40 where higher scores indicate higher perceived stress.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
baseline
|
15.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.49
|
17.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
week 1
|
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
17.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.48
|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
week 2
|
13.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.03
|
15.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.94
|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
week 3
|
12.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
15.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.52
|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
week 4
|
13.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6
|
16.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.91
|
|
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
3 month follow up
|
13.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.96
|
17.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
Participants will complete a behavioral pattern separation task . During this task, participants will encode pictures of common objects while performing a basic categorization task. Participants will then label pictures as "Old" (targets, identical objects to those in the encoding phase), "New" (foils, or completely novel objects), or "Similar" (lure items, distinct exemplars of objects seen during encoding). The measure of interest on this task is the "Lure Discrimination Index", which is calculated as the proportion of lures correctly identified as "similar" minus the proportion of foils that are incorrectly identified as "similar". The theoretical range for the pattern separation index is \[-1,1\], with higher scores indicating better performance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=94 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=47 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Behavioral Pattern Separation Task
baseline
|
.507 Lure Discrimination Index
Standard Deviation .201
|
.456 Lure Discrimination Index
Standard Deviation .197
|
|
Change in Behavioral Pattern Separation Task
week 4
|
.502 Lure Discrimination Index
Standard Deviation .212
|
.489 Lure Discrimination Index
Standard Deviation .179
|
|
Change in Behavioral Pattern Separation Task
3 month follow up
|
.542 Lure Discrimination Index
Standard Deviation .169
|
.483 Lure Discrimination Index
Standard Deviation .205
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
The PROMIS Depression Score is a measure of feelings of depression in the past 7 days. This is a computer-adaptive survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with higher scores indicating increased depression. For analysis, total scores will be converted to t scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10. Higher t scores indicate higher levels of depression. A t score \>= 59.9 is indicative of moderate depression, a t score \>= 65.8 is indicative of moderately severe depression, and a t score \>= 71.5 is indicative of severe depression (based on corresponding cutoffs on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in PROMIS Depression Score
baseline
|
52.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.16
|
54.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.28
|
|
Change in PROMIS Depression Score
week 1
|
51.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.17
|
54.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
|
Change in PROMIS Depression Score
week 2
|
51.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.08
|
42.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.28
|
|
Change in PROMIS Depression Score
week 3
|
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
55.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.35
|
|
Change in PROMIS Depression Score
week 4
|
50.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.97
|
52.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.25
|
|
Change in PROMIS Depression Score
3 month follow up
|
51.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
54.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
The PROMIS Anxiety Score is a measure of feelings of anxiety in the past 7 days. This is a computer-adaptive survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with higher scores indicating increased anxiety. For analysis, total scores will be converted to t scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10. Higher t scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. A t score \>= 62.3 is indicative of moderate anxiety and a t score \>= 67.7 is indicative of severe anxiety (based on corresponding cutoffs on the General Anxiety Disorder-7).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in PROMIS Anxiety Score
week 1
|
55.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.56
|
57.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.31
|
|
Change in PROMIS Anxiety Score
week 2
|
54.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.05
|
55.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
|
Change in PROMIS Anxiety Score
baseline
|
55.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.36
|
58.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.46
|
|
Change in PROMIS Anxiety Score
week 3
|
54.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.95
|
57.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.90
|
|
Change in PROMIS Anxiety Score
week 4
|
53.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.30
|
56.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.72
|
|
Change in PROMIS Anxiety Score
3 month follow up
|
54.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
57.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.94
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
The PCL-5 is a 20-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total possible range of score from 0-80 where higher scores indicate more symptoms of PTSD within the last 30 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) Score
Baseline
|
15.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
|
17.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
|
Change in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) Score
week 4
|
13.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
17.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
|
Change in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5) Score
3-month follow-up
|
13.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.6
|
20.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score is a measure of sleep in the past 7 days. This is a computer-adaptive survey scored on a 5 point likert scale with higher scores indicating increased sleep disturbance. For analysis, total scores will be converted to t scores with a mean of 50 and SD of 10. Higher t scores indicate higher levels of sleep disturbances. A t score \>= 45.1 is indicative of significant sleep disturbances (based on a corresponding cutoff of \>= 5 on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
week 3
|
49.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.33
|
53.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.92
|
|
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
week 4
|
50.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.10
|
53.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.95
|
|
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
Baseline
|
52.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
54.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.28
|
|
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
week 1
|
51.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.05
|
54.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
|
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
week 2
|
50.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
52.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.66
|
|
Change in PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Score
3-month follow-up
|
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.60
|
55.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.84
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
The FFMQ-A8 is an 8-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 'never, or very rarely true' to 'very often or always true', for a total possible range of scores from 8-40 where higher scores indicate greater mindfulness awareness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Five-facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Awareness Subscale (FFMQ-A8) Score
Baseline
|
27.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.88
|
27.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.36
|
|
Change in Five-facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Awareness Subscale (FFMQ-A8) Score
week 4
|
28.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
28.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
|
Change in Five-facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Awareness Subscale (FFMQ-A8) Score
3-month follow-up
|
29.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.41
|
28.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, following week 4 of intervention period, and 3 month follow-upPopulation: The number analyzed changes over time because not all participants provided complete data for this measure at each timepoint.
NIH toolbox Loneliness is a 5-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale. The average score is taken across items for a total possible range of scores from 1-5, where higher scores indicate increased loneliness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
n=99 Participants
Fully remote, 4-week meditation intervention
|
Waitlist Control
n=50 Participants
Control participants will not complete the Healthy Minds Program during the study, but can use it after they have completed the study
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Score
Baseline
|
2.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
2.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Score
week 4
|
2.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Score
3-month follow-up
|
2.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
2.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and following week 4 of intervention periodHMI is a 17-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 (never, none, not at all) to 4 (always, every time, to the highest degree) that assesses awareness, connection, insight, and purpose. Higher scores indicate higher sense of awareness, connection, insight, and purpose. Mean score for each subscale will be reported.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Exploratory analyses will examine linear and nonlinear trajectories of change from baseline through 3-month follow-upRoaming entropy will be calculated according to the formula in Heller et al. (2020). Using continuous GPS location tracking, the measure takes into account distance traveled and distinct locations visited, with a single resulting value reflecting the diversity of movement through one's lived environment (Measured continuously throughout study participation)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Healthy Minds Program (HMP)
Waitlist Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place