Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT05212129
Last Updated: 2025-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-05
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome - Transcutaneous Auricular Neuromodulation
NCT06105541
ABVN Phase 2-Studying the Effect of Stimulation on the Auricular Branch of the Vagal Nerve -B
NCT06827548
Effects of taVNS on Postoperative Pain in Complex Spinal Surgery
NCT07330973
Transdermal Vagal Stimulation for POTS
NCT02281097
Effect of Stimulation on the Vagus Nerve
NCT04206540
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Clinical reports document a high co-morbidity between autonomic disorders and hEDS. This prospective study will focus on three major clinical questions: 1) Are there reliable neurophysiological markers associated with hEDS that can provide insights into the 'neural mechanisms' resulting in multisystem co-morbidities? 2) Will innovative intervention techniques designed to enhance autonomic regulation via two non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation techniques (e.g., auricular and acoustic VNS) provide substantial symptom reduction and improve the hEDS patients' quality of life? 3) Can a novel gastric MRI technique capture gastric motor function abnormalities in adolescents with hEDS?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Arm A (hEDS)
(n=60) patients who meet criteria for hEDS or Hypermobile Spectrum Disorder (HSD) will receive aVNS (acoustic vagal nerve stimulation) therapy via filtered vocal music sound therapy using the Safe and Sound protocol (randomized 1:1 to active vs sham music; double blind study design)
Acoustic vagal nerve stimulation (aVNS) treatment
All subjects receiving acoustic therapy via active VNS (aVNS; n=30) or sham VNS (sVNS; n=30) will enter a four-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trial during which they will listen to either computer altered/filtered vocal music (active treatment) that has been designed to stimulate vagal calming vs. regular non-filtered music (sham treatment). The stimuli will mirror the acoustic intervention known as the Safe and Sound Protocol. This protocol has been found to reduce auditory hypersensitivities and calming the autonomic nervous system by increasing vagal regulation of the heart via brainstem ventral vagal complex. The acoustic intervention may be played by an electronic device (i.e. smartphone, tablet, laptop, mp3) and delivered virtually with the help of trained coaches.
Treatment Arm B (ANS Dysfunction)
(n=30) patients with concerns for ANS dysfunction (with or without hEDS) will receive auricular percutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (pVNS) therapy. Additional sub-study option: 15-20 subjects will undergo gastric MRI and (those who consent to it) will also participate in a biobank blood sample collection study.
Percutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (pVNS) device
Subjects in Treatment Arm B will enter a six-week, prospective open label treatment trial with the FDA-approved and commercially available device IB-Stim. This is an ambulatory, neurostimulation device which consists of a battery powered, externally affixed generator with 4 wire leads attached to electrode/needle arrays affixed to the outer ear. The device delivers low voltage (3.2V) stimulation in alternating frequencies for a total of 5 days (around the clock).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (pVNS) device
Subjects in Treatment Arm B will enter a six-week, prospective open label treatment trial with the FDA-approved and commercially available device IB-Stim. This is an ambulatory, neurostimulation device which consists of a battery powered, externally affixed generator with 4 wire leads attached to electrode/needle arrays affixed to the outer ear. The device delivers low voltage (3.2V) stimulation in alternating frequencies for a total of 5 days (around the clock).
Acoustic vagal nerve stimulation (aVNS) treatment
All subjects receiving acoustic therapy via active VNS (aVNS; n=30) or sham VNS (sVNS; n=30) will enter a four-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trial during which they will listen to either computer altered/filtered vocal music (active treatment) that has been designed to stimulate vagal calming vs. regular non-filtered music (sham treatment). The stimuli will mirror the acoustic intervention known as the Safe and Sound Protocol. This protocol has been found to reduce auditory hypersensitivities and calming the autonomic nervous system by increasing vagal regulation of the heart via brainstem ventral vagal complex. The acoustic intervention may be played by an electronic device (i.e. smartphone, tablet, laptop, mp3) and delivered virtually with the help of trained coaches.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children with functional upper GI complaints and clinical suspicion for hEDS or HSD as well as a Beighton score of at least 4/9
* Children with functional upper GI complaints and clinical suspicion for ANS dysfunction
* De-identified data from our prior studies (IRB #689519 and IRB #1064187) of patients with functional GI disorders who do NOT meet criteria for hEDS will be used as a comparison group
* Children who are English-speaking and lack other explanation for symptoms
* Children willing to participate and consent to this study (for children, have a parent willing to participate)
Exclusion Criteria
* Adult subjects, children or their parents who have significant developmental delay (will be excluded due to difficulties in accurately completing the questionnaires and assessing symptoms)
* Patients with findings of organic disease such as peptic ulcer disease, H.pylori gastritis, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, allergic disorders, metabolic disorder or any other chronic condition or medication that may cause chronic GI symptoms will be excluded from the study.
* Patients who are treated with a new drug affecting the central nervous system in the two weeks prior to enrollment will also be excluded.
* Pregnancy (evaluating MD screens patients as they normally would during a clinic visit (by questioning) and would only perform urine pregnancy test if clinically indicated (absence of menstrual period or other symptoms concerning for pregnancy)
* Chronic alcohol/illicit drug use and/or smoking.
* Severe dermatological condition or active infection of external or middle ear
* Implanted electrical device
* Hearing impaired
* Sight impaired without correction
* Seizure disorder
* Patients with pacemakers, metal clips used in previous surgery or other device which are not compatible with MRI scanning
* Claustrophobia or inability to lie still in the scanner
* Orthodontic braces or permanent retainers
* Patients who are unable to tolerate noise produced by the MRI
* Egg allergy or anticipated inability to complete a standardized egg meal
* Bleeding disorder for the specific biopsies
* Recent antibiotic usage for fecal sample
* Significant anemia or clinical status which will not allow safe blood draw required for blood collection
* Refusal of blood collection or to provide DNA sample
* Inability or unwillingness on the individual (or parent/legal guardian) to provide clinical or family history.
10 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College, London
OTHER
Indiana University
OTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Katja Karrento
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katja Kovacic, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Castori M, Tinkle B, Levy H, Grahame R, Malfait F, Hakim A. A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):148-157. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31539. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Kovacic K, Chelimsky TC, Sood MR, Simpson P, Nugent M, Chelimsky G. Joint hypermobility: a common association with complex functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Pediatr. 2014 Nov;165(5):973-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
Gazit Y, Nahir AM, Grahame R, Jacob G. Dysautonomia in the joint hypermobility syndrome. Am J Med. 2003 Jul;115(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00235-3.
Kovacic K, Hainsworth K, Sood M, Chelimsky G, Unteutsch R, Nugent M, Simpson P, Miranda A. Neurostimulation for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in adolescents: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):727-737. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30253-4. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
Porges SW, Davila MI, Lewis GF, Kolacz J, Okonmah-Obazee S, Hane AA, Kwon KY, Ludwig RJ, Myers MM, Welch MG. Autonomic regulation of preterm infants is enhanced by Family Nurture Intervention. Dev Psychobiol. 2019 Sep;61(6):942-952. doi: 10.1002/dev.21841. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1541191
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.