A Randomised Comparison of Left and Right Sided Approaches to Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-01

Study Completion Date

2022-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare right sided atrioventricular node ablation to left sided atrioventricular node ablation

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Node and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT01057485

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

UNKNOWN NA

Rate or Rhythm Control in CRT: the RHYTHMIC Study

NCT04664686

Atrial Fibrillation Heart Failure

RECRUITING NA

Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Versus Thoracoscopic Ablation Using Patient Activated Implantable Loop Recorders: The ACTUAL Study

NCT01503268

Atrial Fibrillation

WITHDRAWN PHASE4

Study of Ablation Versus antiaRrhythmic Drugs in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT00863213

Atrial Fibrillation

COMPLETED PHASE4

Cartomerge Versus NavX Fusion in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

NCT01432743

Atrial Fibrillation

COMPLETED PHASE2

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Right-sided atrioventricular node ablation has been the initial conventional approach however up to 18.5% of patients require switching to a left sided approach or have a challenging procedure. Previous studies have found that left sided ablation is more efficacious than right-sided ablation requiring less than 5 applications of radiofrequency energy to induce atrioventricular block.

This study will compare right sided atrioventricular node ablation to left sided atrioventricular node ablation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Right sided atrioventricular node ablation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

atrioventricular node ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

atrioventricular node ablation

Left sided atrioventricular node ablation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

atrioventricular node ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

atrioventricular node ablation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

atrioventricular node ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 18 years
* Referred for atrioventricular node ablation for any such indication

Exclusion Criteria

* Stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 6 months
* Myocardial infarction within 6 months
* Medical conditions limiting expected survival to \<1 year
* Moderate to severe aortic stenosis
* History of aortic or mitral valve replacement
* Pregnancy or breast feeding women

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No