Randomized Feasibility Trial for Mesh in Pre-Pectoral Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT05190978

Last Updated: 2025-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-20

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgical mesh products, particularly acellular dermal matrices (ADM), are now used by the majority of plastic surgeons to assist with the nearly 100,000 prosthetic breast reconstruction procedures in the United States, despite never being approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. As surgeons transition to placing breast implants above the chest muscle (pre-pectoral), there has been an increasing reliance on these often expensive mesh products without robust evidence to understand their risks and benefits. Our pilot study is a randomized multi-center trial to evaluate surgical mesh assistance in pre-pectoral tissue expander to breast implant reconstruction to address vital questions for women's public health.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One in eight women will develop breast cancer in her lifetime, causing both physical and psychological trauma due to invasive treatments and the distress associated with removal of a breast. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy has become a critical procedure for many women to restore psychological wellbeing, with implant-based reconstruction the most common approach. Nearly 100,000 patients undergo reconstruction with implants every year in the United States.

Surgical mesh devices, particularly acellular dermal matrices, are now used off-label by most reconstructive surgeons performing prosthetic breast reconstruction. In the past decade, surgeons have advocated a transition from submuscular reconstruction (placement of the implant under the pectoralis muscle) to pre-pectoral (placement above the pectoralis) and often consider mesh to be necessary for this procedure. Surgical mesh has not been approved by the FDA for breast reconstruction for either anatomic location. These mesh devices are considered Class III medical devices and FDA recently prioritized the evaluation of these products during a panel meeting in 2019.

No Level I randomized trial has been successfully performed to determine the actual risks and benefits of mesh devices in breast reconstruction. This study proposes a pilot study as the first ever randomized, multi-center trial for mesh assistance in two-stage prosthetic pre-pectoral breast reconstruction, across the major manufacturers. The goals are to demonstrate feasibility of such a study and to generate high level data toward the evaluation of safety and effectiveness of these products for the benefit of women's public health

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Breast Implant; Complications, Infection or Inflammation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Patients will blinded to whether they receive ADM products during their reconstruction.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acellular Dermal Matrix

Patients will receive ADM during their initial tissue expander placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acellular Dermal Matrix

Intervention Type DEVICE

Acellular dermal matrix will surgically implanted around the tissue expanders in patients in the ADM cohort.

Control

Patients will not receive ADM during their initial tissue expander placement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reconstruction without ADM

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Acellular dermal matrix will not be surgically implanted around the tissue expanders in patients in the control cohort.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acellular Dermal Matrix

Acellular dermal matrix will surgically implanted around the tissue expanders in patients in the ADM cohort.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reconstruction without ADM

Acellular dermal matrix will not be surgically implanted around the tissue expanders in patients in the control cohort.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patients age 22 to 75 undergoing unilateral or bilateral immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction with tissue expanders
* Prophylactic and oncologic mastectomies are both acceptable
* Nipple sparing and skin sparing mastectomy techniques are both acceptable

Exclusion Criteria

* Intraoperative assessment demonstrates unfavorable conditions (ie poor mastectomy skin flap thickness or viability) for immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction in any breast
* Bilateral reconstruction patients undergoing contralateral submuscular reconstruction
* Direct-to-implant reconstruction
* Pregnancy
* Delayed reconstruction
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael R. Delong

Assistant Professor-in-Residence

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Delong, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Los Angeles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Michael Delong, MD

Role: CONTACT

(310) 825-5510

Jaco Festekjian, MD

Role: CONTACT

(310) 825-5510

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael Delong, MD

Role: primary

310 825 5510

Jaco Festekjian, MD

Role: backup

310 825 5510

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

190311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.